In this article, the authors heed the call to explore the attributes of an outstanding professor “by conducting in-depth interviews with students.” The study reveals five predominant themes (rapport, delivery, fairness, knowledge and credibility, organization, and preparation) of teaching excellence, as perceived by students, through subject-directed discussion. The recurring emphases on subcategories such as empathy, communication and personal style, approachability, and accessibility underscore the need for marketing educators to maintain personal interactions with students. The insights provided are purposeful because the predominant themes, and certainly the level of emphasis of each, may be used to improve the education process.
Allen, Jeff, and Duane Davis. 1991. Searching for excellence in marketing education: The relationship between service quality and three outcome variables. Journal of Marketing Education13 (Spring): 47-55.
2.
Clarke, Irvine, Theresa B. Flaherty, and Sandra Mottner. 2001. Student perceptions of educational tools. Journal of Marketing Education23 (3): 169-177.
3.
Conant, Jeffrey S., Denise T. Smart, and Craig A. Kelley. 1988. Master teaching: Pursuing excellence in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education10 (Fall): 3-13.
4.
Dana, Susan W., F. William Brown, and Nancy G. Dodd. 2001. Student perception of teaching effectiveness: A preliminary study of the effects of professors’ transformational and contingent reward leadership behaviors. Journal of the Academy of Business Education2 (Fall): 53-70.
5.
Davis, Richard, Shekhar Misra, and Stuart Van Auken. 2000. Relating pedagogical preference of marketing seniors and alumni to attitude towards the major. Journal of Marketing Education22 (2): 147-154.
6.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonne S. Lincoln. 1998. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Desai, Suzanne, Earl Damewood, and Richard Jones. 2001. Be a good teacher and be seen as a good teacher. Journal of Marketing Education23 (2): 136-144.
8.
Eckrich, Donald W.1990. If ‘excellent teaching’ is the goal, student evaluations are backfiring. Marketing Educator (Fall): 1, 6.
9.
Friedmann, Herbert C.1991. Fifty-six laws of good teaching: A sampling. Teaching Professor (January): 3.
10.
Grunenwald, Joseph P., and Leonard Ackerman. 1986. A modified delphi approach for the development of student evaluations of faculty teaching. Journal of Marketing Education8 (Summer): 32-38.
11.
Guolla, Michael. 1999. Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: Applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice7 (Summer): 87-97.
12.
Haley, S. Randy. 1992. Advice for establishing an effective teaching attitude. Teaching Professor (February): 1-2.
13.
Hill, Mark E., and Joel Herche. 2001. Teaching and effectiveness: Another look. Marketing Education Review11 (Summer): 19-24.
14.
Hise, Richard T., Jeffrey S. Conant, and Robert Gwinner. 1989. Mass sections: Challenges, consequences, and strategic considerations. Journal of Marketing Education11 (Fall): 19-27.
15.
Kelley, Craig A., Jeffrey S. Conant, and Denise T. Smart. 1991. Master teaching revisited: Pursuing excellence from the students’ perspective. Journal of Marketing Education11 (Summer): 1-10.
16.
Kelley, Craig A., Jeffrey S. Conant, and Denise T. Smart. 1998. Marketing education in the 21st century: A delphi approach. In 1998 AMA summer educators proceedings, edited by Ronald C. Goodstein and Scott B. MacKenzie.Chicago: American Marketing Association.
17.
Lantos, Geoffrey P. 1988. Tricks of the trade: Strategies and tactics for achieving excellence in undergraduate marketing education. In 1988 AMA summer educators proceedings, edited by Gary Frazieret al., 137. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
18.
Lantos, Geoffrey P.1997. Motivating students: The attitude of the professor. Marketing Education Review7 (2): 27-38.
19.
Lincoln, Yvonne S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
McCombs, Barbara L., and Jo Sue Whistler. 1997. The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
McCracken, Grant. 1988. The long interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Smart, Denise T., Craig A. Kelley, and Jeffrey S. Conant. 1999. Marketing education in the year 2000: Changes observed and challenges anticipated. Journal of Marketing Education21 (3): 206-216.
23.
Smart, Denise T., Craig A. Kelley, and Jeffrey S. Conant. 2003. Mastering the art of teaching: Pursuing excellence in a new millennium. Journal of Marketing Education25 (1): 71-78.
24.
Spiggle, Susan. 1994. Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research21(December): 491-502.
25.
Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed., edited by Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin, 1-34. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Swanson, Scott R., and J. Charlene Davis. 2000. A view from the aisle: Classroom successes, failures, and recovery strategies. Marketing Education Review10 (Summer): 17-25.
27.
Swanson, Scott R., and Robert Frankel. 2002. A view from the podium: Classroom successes, failures, and recovery strategies. Marketing Education Review12 (Summer): 25-35.
28.
Weaver, Pamela. 1985. Will the best teaching practice please stand up?Journal of Marketing Education7 (Fall): 72-78.
