Objective. To assess preferences between child behavioral problems and estimate their value on a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) scale. Methods. Respondents, age 18 or older, drawn from a nationally representative panel between August 2012 and February 2013 completed a series of paired comparisons, each involving a choice between 2 different behavioral problems described using the Behavioral Problems Index (BPI), a 28-item instrument with 6 domains (Anxious/Depressed, Headstrong, Hyperactive, Immature Dependency, Anti-social, and Peer Conflict/Social Withdrawal). Each behavioral problem lasted 1 or 2 years for an unnamed child, age 7 or 10 years, with no suggested relationship to the respondent. Generalized linear model analyses estimated the value of each problem on a QALY scale, considering its duration and the child’s age. Results. Among 5207 eligible respondents, 4155 (80%) completed all questions. Across the 6 domains, problems relating to antisocial behavior were the least preferred, particularly the items related to cheating, lying, bullying, and cruelty to others. Conclusions. The findings are the first to produce a preference-based summary measure of child behavioral problems on a QALY scale. The results may inform both clinical practice and resource allocation decisions by enhancing our understanding of difficult tradeoffs in how adults view child behavioral problems. Understanding US values also promotes national health surveillance by complementing conventional measures of surveillance, survival, and diagnoses.
CarrollAEDownsSM. Improving decision analyses: parent preferences (utility values) for pediatric health outcomes. J Pediat. 2009;155(1):21–5.
2.
FriedmanJYReedSDWeinfurtKPKahlerKHWalterEBSchulmanKA. Parents’ reported preference scores for childhood atopic dermatitis disease states. BMC Pediatr. 2004;4(1):21.
3.
HauberABItzlerRJohnsonFR. Healthy-days time equivalents for outcomes of acute rotavirus infections. Vaccine. 2011;29(45):8086–93.
4.
SecnikKMatzaLSCottrellSEdgellETildenDMannixS. Health state utilities for childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder based on parent preferences in the United Kingdom. Med Decis Making. 2005;25(1):56–70.
5.
UngarWJ. Economic Evaluation in Child Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
6.
RatcliffeJCouznerLFlynnT. Valuing child health utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(1):15–27.
7.
ChiouCFWeaverMRBellMALeeTAKriegerJW. Development of the multi-attribute Pediatric Asthma Health Outcome Measure (PAHOM). Intl J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(1):23–30.
8.
GeraldJKMcClureLAHarringtonKFMooreTHernandez-MartinezACGeraldLB. Measurement characteristics of the Pediatric Asthma Health Outcome Measure. J Asthma. 2012;49(3):260–6.
9.
PetrouSKupekE. Estimating preference-based Health Utilities Index Mark 3 utility scores for childhood conditions in England and Scotland. Med Decis Making. 2009;29(3):291–303.
10.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Pub. L. 111-148, 124 stat. 119 (as amended by the Health and Education Reconciliation Act, pub. L. 111-152, 124 stat. 1029, subtitle d: patient centered outcomes research). 2010.
11.
SelbyJVBealACFrankL. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1583–4.
12.
PetersonJLZillN. Marital disruption, parent–child relationships, and behavior problems in children. J Marr Fam. 1986;48(2):295–307.
13.
AchenbachTMEdelbrockCS. Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged 4 through 16. Mono Soc Res Child Develop. 1981;46(1):1–82.
Ravens-SiebererUWilleNBadiaX. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):887–97.
16.
WilleNBadiaXBonselG. Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):875–86.
17.
ChristakisDAZimmermanFJ. Violent television viewing during preschool is associated with antisocial behavior during school age. Pediatrics. 2007;120(5):993–9.
18.
RaverCCJonesSMLi-GriningCPMetzgerMChampionKMSardineL. Improving preschool classroom processes: preliminary findings from a randomized trial implemented in head start settings. Early Child Res Quart. 2008;23(1):10–26.
19.
BussingRHalfonNBenjaminBWellsKB. Prevalence of behavior problems in US children with asthma. Arch Pediat Adoles Med. 1995;149(5):565–72.
20.
ByrdRSWeitzmanMAuingerP. Increased behavior problems associated with delayed school entry and delayed school progress. Pediatrics. 1997;100(4):654–61.
21.
ByrdRSWeitzmanMLanphearNEAuingerP. Bed-wetting in us children: epidemiology and related behavior problems. Pediatrics. 1996;98(3):414–9.
22.
GortmakerSLWalkerDKWeitzmanMSobolAM. Chronic conditions, socioeconomic risks, and behavioral-problems in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1990;85(3):267–76.
23.
ChristakisDAZimmermanFJDiGiuseppeDLMcCartyCA. Early television exposure and subsequent attentional problems in children. Pediatrics. 2004;113(4):708–13.
24.
CrockettLJEggebeenDJHawkinsAJ. Fathers presence and young childrens behavioral and cognitive adjustment. J Fam Issues. 1993;14(3):355–77.
25.
KingV. Variation in the consequences of nonresident father involvement for childrens well-being. J Marriage Fam. 1994;56(4):963–72.
26.
KingV. Nonresident father involvement and child well-being: can dads make a difference?J Fam Issues. 1994;15(1):78–96.
27.
LumengJCGannonKCabralHJFrankDAZuckermanB. Association between clinically meaningful behavior problems and overweight in children. Pediatrics. 2003;112(5):1138–45.
28.
WeitzmanMGortmakerSSobolA. Maternal smoking and behavior problems of children. Pediatrics. 1992;90(3):342–9.
29.
CraigBReeveB. Patient-reported outcomes and preference research: Igniting the candle at both ends and the middle. ISPOR Conn. 2012Sep–Oct:18(5):24.
FeenyD. Standardization and regulatory guidelines may inhibit science and reduce the usefulness of analyses based on the application of preference-based measures for policy decisions. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(3):316–9.
33.
CraigBMBusschbachJJ. The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation. Popul Health Metr. 2009;7:3.
34.
CraigBMBusschbachJJSalomonJ. International valuation set for EQ-5D health states. Value Health. 2008;11(3):A177–A.
35.
CraigBMBusschbachJJSalomonJA. Modeling ranking, time trade-off, and visual analog scale values for EQ-5D health states: a review and comparison of methods. Med Care. 2009;47(6):634–41.
36.
McFaddenD. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: ZarembkaP, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1974.
37.
UrbanFM. Urban’s solution (minimum normit x2). In: BockRDJonesLV, eds. The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and Choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day; 1968.
38.
HarrisJ. The Value of Life. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1985.
39.
WilliamsA. Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the “fair innings” argument. Health Econ. 1997;6(2):117–32.
40.
ProsserLAHammittJKKerenR. Measuring health preferences for use in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses of interventions in children: theoretical and methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(9):713–26.
41.
CraigBMReeveBBBrownPM. US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29. Value Health. 2014;17(8):846–53.
42.
CraigBMPickardASStolkEBrazierJE. US valuation of the SF-6D. Med Decis Making. 2013:33(6):793–803.
43.
Ramos-GoniJErreaMRivero-AriasOCabasesJMPintoJL. EQ-5D-5L valuation project for the Spanish population: a descriptive overview and preliminary results. Value Health. 2012;15(7):A279–A.
44.
Eidt-KochDMittendorfTGreinerW. Cross-sectional validity of the EQ-5D-Y as a generic health outcome instrument in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis in Germany. BMC Pediatr. 2009;9:55.
45.
JelsmaJ. A comparison of the performance of the EQ-5D and the EQ-5D-Y health-related quality of life instruments in South African children. Int J Rehabil Res. 2010;33(2):172–7.
46.
CraigBRungeSRand-HendriksenKRamos-GoñiJOppeM. Learning and satisficing: an analysis of sequence effects in health valuation. Value Health.In press.
47.
ArnesenTTrommaldM. Are QALYs based on time trade-off comparable? A systematic review of TTO methodologies. Health Econ. 2005;14(1):39–53.
48.
NeumannPJWeinsteinMC. Legislating against use of cost-effectiveness information. New Engl J Med. 2010;363(16):1495–7.
49.
GoldMRStevensonDFrybackDG. HALYs and QALYs and DALYs, oh my: similarities and differences in summary measures of population health. Ann Rev Pub Health. 2002;23:115–34.
50.
RushbyJFHansonK. Calculating and presenting disability adjusted life years (DALYs) in cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2001;16(3):326–31.
51.
SassiF. Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21(5):402–8.
52.
UngarWJProsserLABurnettHF. Values and evidence colliding: health technology assessment in child health. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;13(4):417–9.
53.
BaschEAronsonNBergA. Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1636–40.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
