Background. The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Unstable Angina Practice Guideline recommends outpatient management for patients at low risk and admission to a monitored bed for patients at intermediate-high risk of adverse short-term outcomes, but the clinical consequences of adhering to these recommendations are unclear. Methods. This analysis included 7466 adults who presented to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms of possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and who participated in 3 prospective clinical effectiveness trials during the period 1993 to 2001. The authors used logistic regression to assess the impact of concordance with guideline triage recommendations on subsequent diagnostic testing, follow-up care, and 30-day mortality and applied propensity score methods to adjust for selection bias. Results. Among low-risk patients (n = 1099), ED discharge was not associated with higher mortality and did not increase the need for emergency care or hospitalization during follow-up (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63—1.6 for ED revisits); however, 1.7% of discharged low-risk patients had confirmed ACS. Among intermediate- to high-risk patients (n = 6367), admission to a monitored bed was not associated with reduction in 30-day mortality but significantly reduced the need for follow-up ED care (adjusted OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69—0.96). Conclusions. This analysis supports the practice of discharging low-risk ED patients with symptoms of possible ACS but highlights the need to arrange timely follow-up (or to perform additional risk stratification in the ED prior to discharge). It also confirms the benefit of admitting ED patients with intermediate- to high-risk characteristics to a monitored bed.
Nourjah P.National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1997 Emergency Department Summary . Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, no. 304. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics ; 1999.
2.
Miller CD, Lindsell CJ, Khandelwal S., et al. Is the initial diagnostic impression of ``noncardiac chest pain'' adequate to exclude cardiac disease?Ann Emerg Med.2004;44:565—74.
3.
Evidence-Based Practice Program. Prediction of Risk for Patients with Unstable Angina. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, no. 31. AHRQ Publication No. 00-E030. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 2000.
4.
Limkakeng A Jr , Gibler WB, Pollack C., et al. Combination of Goldman risk and initial cardiac troponin I for emergency department chest pain patient risk stratification . Acad Emerg Med.2001;8:696—702.
5.
Duseja R., Feldman JAMissed acute cardiac ischemia in the ED: limitations of diagnostic testing . Am J Emerg Med.2004;22: 219—25.
6.
Lau J.Diagnosing acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review of the accuracy and clinical effect of current technologies. Ann Emerg Med.2001;37:453—60.
7.
Diercks D., Gibler B., Liu T., Sayre MR, Storrow ABIdentification of patients at risk by graded exercise testing in an emergency department chest pain center. Am J Cardiol.2000;86:289—92.
8.
Kontos MC, Kurdziel K., McQueen R., et al. Comparison of 2-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging for diagnosing myocardial infarction in emergency department patients. Am Heart J.2002;143:659—67.
9.
Udelson JE, Beshansky JR, Ballin DS, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA.2002;288:2693—700.
10.
Wilkinson K. , Severance H.Identification of chest pain patients appropriate for an emergency department observation unit. Emerg Med Clin North Am.2001;19:35—66.
11.
Braunwald E. , Brown J., Brown L., et al. Unstable Angina: Diagnosis and Management. Clinical Practice Guideline, no. 10. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services;1994.
12.
Katz D., Aufderheide T., Bogner M., Rahko P., Brown R., Selker H.Utility of the revised AHCPR unstable angina guideline in the triage of ED patients with possible ACS. Circulation. 2002 ;106 (suppl II):II—722.
13.
Farkouh M., Smars P., Reeder G., et al. A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. N Engl J Med.1998;339:1882—8.
14.
Green LA, Yates JFInfluence of pseudodiagnostic information on the evaluation of ischemic heart disease. Ann Emerg Med.1995;25:451—7.
15.
Graber ML, Franklin N., Gordon R.Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med.2005;165:1493—9.
16.
Canto JG, Shlipak MG, Rogers WJ, et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain. JAMA.2000;283:3223—9.
17.
Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R., et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med.2000;342:1163—70.
18.
Van der Does E., Lubsen J., Pool J.Acute coronary events in a general practice: objectives and design of the Imminent Myocardial Infarction Rotterdam Study . Heart Bull.1976;7:91—8.
19.
Katz D., Griffith J., Beshansky J., Selker H.The use of empiric clinical data in the evaluation of practice guidelines for unstable angina. JAMA.1996;276:1568—74.
20.
Gillum R., Fortmann S., Prineas R., Kottke TEInternational diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction and acute stroke. Am Heart J.1984;108:150—8.
21.
Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee.Myocardial infarction redefined: a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/ American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction . J Am Coll Cardiol.2000;36:959—69.
22.
Cannon C., Battler A., Brindis R., et al. ACC key elements and data definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee). J Am Coll Cardiol.2001;38:2114—30.
23.
Rubin D.Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores . Ann Intern Med.1997;127:757—63.
24.
D'Agostino R.Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med.1998;17:2265—81.
25.
Huber P.The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions . In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press;1967. p 221—33.
26.
Rogers W.Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech Bull.1993;13:19—23.
27.
Christensen J., Innes G., McKnight D., et al. Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort. CMAJ . 2004;170:1803—7.
28.
Karcz A., Korn R., Burke M., et al. Malpractice claims against emergency physicians in Massachusetts: 1975-1993. Am J Emerg Med.1996;14:341—5.
29.
Iliadis E., Klein L., Vandenberg B., et al. Clinical practice guidelines in unstable angina improve clinical outcomes by assuring early intensive medical treatment. J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1999;34: 1689—95.
30.
Giugliano RP , Lloyd-Jones DM, Camargo CA Jr, Makary MA, O'Donnell CJAssociation of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival. Arch Intern Med.2000;160:1775—80.
31.
Allen LA, O'Donnell CJ, Giugliano RP, Camargo CA Jr, Lloyd-Jones DMCare concordant with guidelines predicts decreased long-term mortality in patients with unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction . Am J Cardiol.2004;93: 1218—22.
32.
Weingarten S.Practice guidelines and prediction rules should be subject to careful clinical testing. JAMA.1997;277:1977—8.
33.
Braunwald E. , Antman E., Beasley J., et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—2002: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina) . Circulation.2002;106:1893—900.
34.
Goldman L., Kirtane AJTriage of patients with acute chest pain and possible cardiac ischemia: the elusive search for diagnostic perfection. Ann Intern Med.2003;139:987—95.
35.
Manini AF, Gisondi MA, van der Vlugt TM, Schrieber DHAdverse cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain six months after a negative inpatient evaluation for acute coronary syndrome . Acad Emerg Med.2002;9:896—902.
36.
Shoyeb A., Bokhari S., Sullivan J., et al. Value of definitive diagnostic testing in the evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Am J Cardiol.2003;91: 1410—4.
37.
de Filippi CR, Rosanio S., Tochhi M., et al. Randomized comparison of a strategy of predischarge coronary angiography versus exercise testing in low-risk patients in a chest pain unit: in-hospital and long-term outcomes . J Am Coll Cardiol.2001;37:2024—49. 38. Goodacre S., Nicholl J., Dixon S., et al. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care. BMJ.2004;328:254—9.
38.
Mushlin A., Kern L., Paris M., Lambert D., Williams G.The value of diagnostic information to patients with chest pain suggestive of coronary artery disease. Med Decis Making. 2005;25:149—57.
39.
Lee T., Goldman L.Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med.2000;342:1187—95.
40.
Selker HP, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, et al. Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med.1998;129:845—55.
41.
Katz D., Aufderheide T., Bogner M., Rahko P., Beshansky J., Selker H.Impact of unstable angina guidelines in the triage of emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:606—16.
42.
Hanley J., McNeil B.A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983 ;148:839—43.
43.
Selker H., Griffith J., D'Agostino R.A tool for judging coronary care unit admission appropriateness valid for both real-time and retrospective use: a time-insensitive predictive instrument (TIPI) for acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter study. Med Care.1991; 29:610—27.
44.
Rosenbaum P. , Rubin D.Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score . Am Stat. 1985;39:33—8.
45.
Normand S-LT , Landrum M., Guadagnoli E., et al. Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol.2001;54:387—98.
