This longitudinal study examined a motivational–cognitive pathway linking adolescents’ social goal orientations, perceived defending norms, and bullying-related behaviors. We tested whether social goal orientations predicted adolescents’ perceptions of defending norms and subsequent involvement in bullying-related roles, and whether perceived defending norms mediated these associations. Participants were 956 South Korean students in Grades 4–6 (52.5% male). Social goal orientations (Wave 1, self-report), perceived defending norms (Wave 2, self-report), and bullying, defending, and assisting/reinforcing behaviors (Wave 2, peer nominations) were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Social development goals were positively associated with perceived defending norms and greater defending, whereas demonstration-approach goals were negatively associated with perceived defending norms and positively associated with bullying and assisting/reinforcing. Perceived defending norms mediated the association between social development goals and defending behavior. These findings clarify how adolescents’ social motivations shape interpretations of peer norms and promote defending behavior during early adolescence.
BassE. C.SaldarriagaL. M.VelasquezA. M.SantoJ. B.BukowskiW. M. (2022). Unpacking the misfit effect: Exploring the influence of gender and social norms on the association between aggression and peer victimization. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025421992867
2.
BrownB. B.LarsonJ. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 74–103). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004
3.
BusseyK.BanduraA. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676
4.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
5.
CaravitaS. C. S.CillessenA. H. N. (2012). Agentic or communal? Associations between interpersonal goals, popularity, and bullying in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00632.x
6.
CaravitaS. C. S.Di BlasioP.SalmivalliC. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x
7.
CaravitaS. C. S.SijtsemaJ. J.RambaranJ. A.GiniG. (2014). Peer influences on moral disengagement in late childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9953-1
8.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
CrickN. R.DodgeK. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
11.
DillonC. E.LochmanJ. E. (2022). Correcting for norm misperception of anti-bullying attitudes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419860598
12.
DodgeK. A.DishionT. J.LansfordJ. E. (Eds.), (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. The Guilford Press.
13.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
14.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
15.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 458–476). Sage.
16.
GarandeauC. F.VermandeM. M.ReijntjesA. H. A.AartsE. (2022). Classroom bullying norms and peer status: Effects on victim-oriented and bully-oriented defending. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419894722
17.
GestS. D.MadillR. A.ZadzoraK. M.MillerA.RodkinP. C. (2014). Teacher management of elementary classroom social dynamics: Associations with changes in student adjustment. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426613512677
18.
GrusecJ. E.GoodnowJ. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child's internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.4
19.
HayesA. F.ScharkowM. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter?Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
20.
HorstS. J.FinneyS. J.BarronK. E. (2007). Moving beyond academic achievement goal measures: A study of social achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 667–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.011
JarvinenD. W.NichollsJ. G. (1996). Adolescents’ social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.435
23.
KärnäA.VoetenM.LittleT. D.PoskipartaE.KaljonenA.SalmivalliC. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4–6. Child Development, 82(1), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x
24.
KimH.MarkusH. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
25.
Laninga-WijnenL.SteglichC.HarakehZ.VolleberghW.VeenstraR.DijkstraJ. K. (2020). The role of prosocial and aggressive popularity norm combinations in prosocial and aggressive friendship processes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(3), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01088-x
26.
Laninga-WijnenL.van den BergY. H. M.GarandeauC. F.MulderS.de CastroB. O. (2023). Does being defended relate to decreases in victimization and improved psychosocial adjustment among victims?Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000712
27.
LaursenB.VeenstraR. (2021). Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12606
28.
LemeriseE. A.ArsenioW. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00124
29.
LindenbergS. (2013). Social rationality, self-regulation, and well-being: The regulatory significance of needs, goals, and the self. In WittekR.SnijdersT. A. B.NeeV. (Eds.), Handbook of rational choice social research (pp. 72–112). Stanford University Press.
30.
MaT.-L.MeterD. J.ChenW.-T.LeeY. (2019). Defending behavior of peer victimization in school and cyber context during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of individual and peer-relational characteristics. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 891–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000205
31.
MoldenD. C.DweckC. S. (2006). Finding meaning in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192
32.
MouratidisA. A.SideridisG. D. (2009). On social achievement goals: Their relations with peer acceptance, classroom belongingness, and perceptions of loneliness. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(3), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.77.3.285-308
33.
NickersonA. B.BreeseA.AlbertiJ. M. (2023). Bullying as a form of abuse: Conceptualization and prevention. In MillerT. W. (Ed.), School violence and primary prevention (2nd ed., pp. 487–512). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13134-9_21
34.
OlthofT.GoossensF. A.VermandeM. M.AlevaE. A.van der MeulenM. (2011). Bullying as strategic behavior: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49(3), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.003
35.
PanB.ZhangL.JiL.GarandeauC. F.SalmivalliC.ZhangW. (2020). Classroom status hierarchy moderates the association between social dominance goals and bullying behavior in middle childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2285–2297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01285-z
36.
PouwelsJ. L.van NoordenT. H. J.CaravitaS. C. S. (2019). Defending victims of bullying in the classroom: The role of moral responsibility and social costs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103831
37.
PozzoliT.GiniG. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9
38.
PozzoliT.GiniG.VienoA. (2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: A multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83(6), 1917–1931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x
39.
ReijntjesA.VermandeM.GoossensF. A.OlthofT.van de SchootR.AlevaL.van der MeulenM. (2013). Developmental trajectories of bullying and social dominance in youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(4), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.12.004
40.
RodkinP. C.RyanA. M.JamisonR.WilsonT. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029389
41.
RoseA. J.RudolphK. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
42.
RudolphK. D.Troop-GordonW.LlewellynN. (2013). Interactive contributions of self-regulation deficits and social motivation to psychopathology: Unraveling divergent pathways to aggressive behavior and depressive symptoms. Development and Psychopathology, 25(2), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412001149
43.
RyanA. M.JamisonR. S.ShinH.ThompsonG. N. (2012). Social achievement goals and adjustment at school during early adolescence. In RyanA. M.LaddG. W. (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–185). IAP Information Age Publishing.
44.
RyanA. M.ShimS. S. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1246–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289345
45.
RyanA. M.ShimS. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents' social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 672–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.672
SalmivalliC.KärnäA.PoskipartaE. (2011a). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411407457
48.
SalmivalliC.VoetenM. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000488
49.
SalmivalliC.VoetenM.PoskipartaE. (2011b). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090
50.
SheridanS. M.BovairdJ. A.GloverT. A.GarbaczS. A.WitteA.KwonK. (2012). A randomized trial examining the effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and the mediating role of the parent–teacher relationship. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087374
51.
ShinH. (2021). Early adolescents’ social achievement goals and perceived relational support: Their additive and interactive effects on social behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 767599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767599
52.
ShinH. (2022). The role of perceived bullying norms in friendship dynamics: An examination of friendship selection and influence on bullying and victimization. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419868533
53.
ShinH.GyeongS. (2024). Perceived and actual norms, and norm misperceptions in explaining participant roles in bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53(11), 2683–2693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-02042-2
54.
ShinH.GyeongS. (2025). When motivation isn’t enough: Perceived teacher attitudes, efficacy, and efforts moderate student responses to bullying. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 609. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02959-8
55.
ShinH.RyanA. M. (2012). How do young adolescents cope with social problems? An examination of social goals, coping with friends, and social adjustment. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32(6), 851–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431611429944
56.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
57.
SmithP. K.López-CastroL.RobinsonS.GörzigA. (2019). Consistency of gender differences in bullying in cross-cultural surveys. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.04.006
58.
SomervilleL. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413476512
Van RyzinM. J.RosethC. J. (2018). Cooperative learning in middle school: A means to improve peer relations and reduce victimization, bullying, and related outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1192–1201. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000265
61.
VolkA. A.CamilleriJ. A.DaneA. V.MariniZ. A. (2012). Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary adaptation?Aggressive Behavior, 38(3), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21418
62.
WeinerB. (1986). Attribution, emotion, and action. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 281–312). Guilford Press.
63.
YamagishiT.HashimotoH.SchugJ. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19(6), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x
