Prosocial Peer Affiliation as a Buffer of the Bidirectional Relationship Between Bullying Victimization and Perpetration in Early Adolescents

Abstract

This study focused on examining the role of prosocial peer affiliation as a potential buffer of the bidirectional relationship between bullying victimization and perpetration, using nationally representative data of U.S. early adolescents (N = 7973) from the fourth- and fifth-grade rounds of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–2011 (ECLS-K:2011). Employing the cross-lagged panel model and latent moderated structural equations approach, results indicated that prosocial peer affiliation significantly buffered the relationship between bullying victimization and later perpetration. However, prosocial peer affiliation significantly enhanced, rather than buffered, the association between bullying perpetration and subsequent victimization. Findings suggest that antibullying interventions may focus on helping children who are bullied to be affiliated with prosocial peers to prevent subsequent bullying behavior.

Keywords

bullying victimization bullying perpetration prosocial peer affiliation buffer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berger

Batanova

Cance

J. D.

(2015). Aggressive and prosocial? Examining latent profiles of behavior, social status, machiavellianism, and empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2230–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0298-9

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.

Campbell

D. T.

Stanley

J. C.

(1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. Houghton Mifflin.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2014). Bullying surveillance among school‐aged children: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/bullying-definitions-final-a.pdf

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Cheung

G. W.

Cooper-Thomas

H. D.

Lau

R. S.

Wang

L. C.

(2021). Testing moderation in business and psychological studies with latent moderated structural equations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(6), 1009–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0

Cohen

West

Aiken

(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cole

D. A.

Maxwell

S. E.

(2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.558

Cook

C. R.

Williams

K. R.

Guerra

N. G.

Kim

T. E.

Sadek

(2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020149

10.

Espelage

D. L.

Holt

M. K.

(2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2-3), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v02n02_08

11.

Ettekal

Chaudhary

Luo

Brooker

R. J.

(2022). Chronic, increasing, and decreasing peer victimization trajectories and the development of externalizing and internalizing problems in middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 1(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579422000426

12.

Guerra

N. G.

Williams

K. R.

Sadek

(2011). Understanding bullying and victimization during childhood and adolescence: A mixed methods study. Child Development, 82(1), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01556.x

13.

Hamaker

E. L.

Kuiper

R. M.

Grasman

R. P. P. P.

(2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889

14.

Haynie

D. L.

Osgood

D. W.

(2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0018

15.

Hong

J. S.

Choi

Espelage

D. L.

C.-F.

Boraggina-Ballard

Fisher

B. W.

(2021). Are children of welfare recipients at a heightened risk of bullying and peer victimization? Child and Youth Care Forum, 50(1), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-020-09587-w

16.

Hong

J. S.

Espelage

D. L.

(2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003

17.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

18.

Hymel

Swearer

S. M.

(2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038928

19.

Kandel

D. B.

(1978). Homophily, selection and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1086/226792

20.

Kärnä

Voeten

Little

T. D.

Alanen

Poskiparta

Salmivalli

(2013). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 1–3 and 7–9. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030417

21.

Kelly

E. V.

Newton

N. C.

Stapinski

L. A.

Slade

Barrett

E. L.

Conrod

P. J.

Teesson

(2015). Suicidality, internalizing problems and externalizing problems among adolescent bullies, victims and bully-victims. Preventive Medicine, 73(1), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.020

22.

Kiesner

Poulin

Nicotra

(2003). Peer relations across contexts: Individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. Child Development, 74(1), 1328–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00610

23.

Klein

Moosbrugger

(2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338

24.

Lebrun-Harris

L. A.

Sherman

L. J.

Limber

S. P.

Miller

B. D.

Edgerton

E. A.

(2019). Bullying victimization and perpetration among US children and adolescents: 2016 national survey of children’s health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2543–2557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1170-9

25.

Lee

C. T.

Padilla-Walker

L. M.

Memmott-Elison

M. K.

(2017). The role of parents and peers on adolescents’ prosocial behavior and substance use. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(7), 1053–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516665928

26.

Lereya

S. T.

Copeland

W. E.

Zammit

Wolke

(2015). Bully/victims: A longitudinal, population-based cohort study of their mental health. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(12), 1461–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0705-5

27.

Little

T. D.

Preacher

K. J.

Selig

J. P.

Card

N. A.

(2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077757

28.

Long

J. D.

Pellegrini

A. D.

(2003). Studying change in dominance and bullying with linear mixed models. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2003.12086208

29.

Low

Polanin

J. R.

Espelage

D. L.

(2013). The role of social networks in physical and relational aggression among young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1078–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9933-5

30.

Marsh

H. W.

Scalas

L. F.

Nagengast

(2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019225

31.

Maslowsky

Jager

Hemken

(2015). Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414552301

32.

Meldrum

R. C.

Hay

(2012). Do peers matter in the development of self-control? Evidence from a longitudinal study of youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(6), 691–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9692-0

33.

Morgan

P. L.

Woods

A. D.

Wang

Farkas

Hillemeier

M. M.

Mitchell

(2022). Which children are frequently victimized in US elementary schools? Population-Based estimates. School Mental Health, 14(1), 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-022-09520-7

34.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. Available at: https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_8.pdf

35.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine . (2016). Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. National Academies Press.

36.

Nie

Yang

Stomski

Zhao

Teng

Guo

(2022). Longitudinal link between bullying victimization and bullying perpetration: A multilevel moderation analysis of perceived school climate. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13-14), NP12238–NP12259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521997940

37.

Olweus

(1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.

38.

Olweus

Limber

S. P.

(2010). The Olweus bullying prevention program: Implementation and evaluation over two decades. In Jimerson

S. R.

Swearer

S. M.

Espelage

D. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 377–401). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

39.

Olweus

Limber

S. P.

Breivik

(2019). Addressing specific forms of bullying: A large-scale evaluation of the Olweus bullying prevention program. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00009-7

40.

Pellegrini

A. D.

(1998). Bullies and victims in school: A review and call for research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)80034-3

41.

Popp

A. M.

(2012). The effects of exposure, proximity, and capable guardians on the risk of bullying victimization. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10(4), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204011434833

42.

Pourhoseingholi

M. A.

Baghestani

A. R.

Vahedi

(2012). How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench, 5(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v5i2.246

43.

Putnick

D. L.

Bornstein

M. H.

(2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

44.

Salmivalli

(2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007

45.

Salmivalli

Peets

(2008). Bullies, victims, and bully-victim relationships. In Rubin

Bukowski

Laursen

(Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 322–340). Guilford Press.

46.

Satorra

Bentler

P. M.

(2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y

47.

Tourangeau

Nord

Lê

Sorongon

A. G.

Hagedorn

M. C.

Daly

Najarian

(2015). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–11 (ECLS-K:2011): User’s manual for the ECLS-K:2011 kindergarten data file and electronic codebook, public version (NCES 2015-074). National Center for Education Statistics. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015074.pdf

48.

Tourangeau

Nord

Lê

Wallner-Allen

Vaden-Kiernan

Blaker

Najarian

(2018). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–11 (ECLS-K:2011): User’s manual for the ECLS-K:2011 kindergarten–fourth grade data file and electronic codebook, public version (NCES 2018-032). National Center for Education Statistics. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018032.pdf

49.

Tourangeau

Nord

Lê

Wallner-Allen

Vaden-Kiernan

Blaker

Najarian

(2019). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–11 (ECLS-K:2011): User’s manual for the ECLS-K:2011 kindergarten–fifth grade data file and electronic codebook, public version (NCES 2019-051). National Center for Educational Statistics. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019051.pdf

50.

Ttofi

M. M.

Farrington

D. P.

Lösel

(2012). School bullying as a predictor of violence later in life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.05.002

51.

Ttofi

M. M.

Farrington

D. P.

Lösel

Crago

R. V.

Theodorakis

(2016). School bullying and drug use later in life: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000120

52.

Van Ryzin

M. J.

Roseth

C. J.

(2018). Cooperative learning in middle school: A means to improve peer relations and reduce victimization, bullying, and related outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1192–1201. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000265

53.

Veenstra

Lindenberg

Oldehinkel

A. J.

De Winter

A. F.

Verhulst

F. C.

Ormel

(2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.672

54.

Walters

G. D.

(2020). Unraveling the bidirectional relationship between bullying victimization and perpetration: A test of mechanisms from opportunity and general strain theories. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204020922874

55.

Walters

G. D.

(2021). School-age bullying victimization and perpetration: A meta-analysis of prospective studies and research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(5), 1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020906513

56.

Wang

Chen

Zhang

Oudekerk

B. A.

(2020). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2019. National Center for Education Statistics.

57.

Yang

Salmivalli

(2013). Different forms of bullying and victimization: Bully-victims versus bullies and victims. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(6), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.793596

58.

Yun

H. Y.

(2020). New approaches to defender and outsider roles in school bullying. Child Development, 91(4), e814–e832. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13312

59.

Zych

Farrington

D. P.

Ttofi

M. M.

(2019). Protective factors against bullying and cyberbullying: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.06.008