The current study examined the development of early adolescents’ social perspective taking (SPT) through collaborative small-group discussions. A total of 250 fifth-graders were assigned to three conditions, Collaborative Social Reasoning (CSR) discussions, Read-Aloud (RA) and Regular Instruction (RI). SPT was assessed before and after the intervention using an action-based argumentation essay task through a theory-driven coding scheme aiming at capturing individuals’ agentic role in SPT and SPT justification strategies. Poisson regressions with Generalized Estimating Equations based on the young adolescents’ essays revealed that CSR peer group members considered more justified perspectives of the issues and provided more justification based on story events and emotional concerns for the perspectives in comparison with fifth graders in the RA and RI groups. Individuals in the RA group generated more emotional justification for their perspectives than RI members. The findings provide insights into the social process of developing SPT under collaborative small-group discussions.
AkosP.RoseR. A.OrthnerD. (2015). Sociodemographic moderators of middle school transition effects on academic achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(2), 170–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614529367
2.
AlexanderR. J. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (3rd ed.). Dialogos.
3.
AllemandM.SteigerA. E.FendH. A. (2015). Empathy development in adolescence predicts social competencies in adulthood. Journal of Personality, 83(2), 229–241.
4.
AmesD. R.KammrathL. K. (2004). Mind-reading and metacognition: Narcissism, not actual competence, predicts self-estimated ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(3), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jonb.0000039649.20015.0e
5.
AustinJ. A. (1955). In UrmsonJ. O.SbisàM. (Eds.), How to do things with words: The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955, 1962. Harvard University Press.
6.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). In (M.C. HolquistEmerson, M. Holquist, & Trans.). Austin (Eds.), The dialogic imagination.TX: University of Texas Press.
7.
BatanovaM. D.LoukasA. (2011). Social anxiety and aggression in early adolescents: Examining the moderating roles of empathic concern and perspective taking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(11), 1534–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9634-x
8.
BerndtT. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current directions in psychological science, 11(1), 7–10.
9.
BoalerJ. (2008). Promoting “relational equity” and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532145
10.
BoyceW.TorsheimT.CurrieC.ZambonA. (2006). The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: Validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Social Indicators Research, 78(3), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-1607-6
11.
BuyeaR. (2010). Because of Mr. Terupt. Random House Children’s Books.
12.
CarlsonS. M.MosesL. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind. Child Development, 72(4), 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00333
13.
CheungH. S.ElliottJ. M. (2017). Child shyness and peer likeability: The moderating role of pragmatics and vocabulary. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12192
14.
ChinnC.AndersonR. C.WaggonerM. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 378–411. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.36.4.3
15.
ChinnC. A.ClarkD. B. (2013). Learning through collaborative argumentation. In The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 314–332). Routledge.
16.
ClarkA. M.AndersonR. C.KuoL. J.KimI. H.ArchodidouA.Nguyen-JahielK. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 181–198.
17.
CognettaR.SprinthallN. (1978). Students as teachers: Role taking as means of promoting psychological and ethical development during adolescence. Character Potential: A Record of Research, 8, 188–195.
18.
CurrieC.MolchoM.BoyceW.HolsteinB. E.TorsheimT.RichterM. (2008). Researching health inequalities in adolescents: The development of the Health Behaviour in school–aged children (HBSC) family affluence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 66(6), 1429–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.024
19.
DarnonC.MullerD.SchragerS.PannuzzoN.ButeraF. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.766
20.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
21.
DavisM. H.FranzoiS. L. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self–consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90006-c
22.
DegnerJ.WenturaD. (2010). Automatic prejudice in childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017993
DiazgranadosS.SelmanR. L.DionneM. (2016). Acts of social perspective taking: A functional construct and the validation of a performance measure for early adolescents. Social Development, 25(3), 572–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12157
25.
DodgeK. A.LansfordJ. E.BurksV. S.BatesJ. E.PettitG. S.FontaineR.PriceJ. M. (2003). Peer rejection and social information–processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74(2), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402004
26.
DongT.AndersonR. C.KimI. H.LiY. (2008). Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 400–424. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.43.4.5
27.
DowellF. O. (2000). Dovey Coe. Atheneum Books for Young Readers.
28.
DuganJ. P.BohleC. W.WoelkerL. R.CooneyM. A. (2014). The role of social perspective–taking in developing students’ leadership capacities. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsarp-2014-0001
29.
DunnJ. (2004). Children’s friendships: The beginnings of intimacy. Blackwell Publishing.
30.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta–analysis of school–based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
31.
FitzhughL. (1964). Harriet the Spy. Harper & Row.
32.
GalinskyA. D.MadduxW. W.GilinD.WhiteJ. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 19(4), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02096.x
33.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective–taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in–group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
34.
GehlbachH. (2004). A new perspective on perspective taking: A multidimensional approach to conceptualizing an aptitude. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:edpr.0000034021.12899.11
35.
GehlbachH. (2011). Making social studies social: Engaging students through different forms of social perspective taking. Theory Into Practice, 50(4), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1080.00405841.2011.607394
GehlbachH.BrinkworthM. E. (2012). The social perspective taking process: Strategies and sources of evidence in taking another’s perspective. Teachers College Record, 114(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211400107
GlassmanM.LinT. J.HaS. Y. (2022). Concepts, collaboration, and a company of actors: a Vygotskian model for concept development in the 21st century. Oxford Review of Education, 1–16.
40.
GleasonK.Jensen-CampbellL. A.IckesW. (2009). The role of empathic accuracy in adolescents’ peer relations and adjustment. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209336605
41.
GoodwinN. P.MrugS.BorchC.CillessenA. H. (2012). Peer selection and socialization in adolescent depression: The role of school transitions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9723-x
42.
GopnikA.WellmanH. M. (1994). The theory theory. In HirschfieldL.GelmanS. (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press.
43.
GreenL. M.MissottenL.ToneE. B.LuyckxK. (2018). Empathy, depressive symptoms, and self–esteem in adolescence: The moderating role of the mother–adolescent relationship. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(12), 3964–3974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1216-z
44.
HallH. K.MillearP. M.SummersM. J.IsbelB. (2021). Longitudinal research on perspective taking in adolescence: A systematic review. Adolescent Research Review, 6(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-021-00150-9
45.
HallJ. A.AndrzejewskiS. A.YopchickJ. E. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33(3), 149–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0070-5
46.
HarrisP. L. (1994). Thinking by children and scientists: False analogies and neglected similarities. In HirschfieldL. A.GelmanS. A. (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 294–315). Cambridge University Press.
47.
HayashiY. (2018). The power of a “Maverick” in collaborative problem solving: An experimental investigation of individual perspective‐taking within a group. Cognitive Science, 42(S1), 69–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12587
48.
HaydenB.PickarD. (1981). The impact of moral discussions on children’s level of moral reasoning. Journal of Moral Education, 10(2), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724810100207
49.
HoweA. (1990). A climate for small group talk. In BrubacherM.PayneR.RickensK. (Eds.), Perspectives on small group learning (pp. 101–118). Rubicon.
50.
HsiehM. Y.LinT. J.SalladeR.HaS. Y.KraatzE.ShinS. (2021). A collaborative small-group discussion approach to improving fifth graders’ use of academic, relational, social, and emotional vocabulary. International Journal of Educational Research, 106, 101744.
51.
HsinL.SnowC. (2017). Social perspective taking: A benefit of bilingualism in academic writing. Reading and Writing, 30(6), 1193–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9718-9
52.
JohnsonD. W. (1975). Cooperativeness and social perspective taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076285
53.
KeenS. (2007). Empathy and the novel. Oxford University Press.
54.
KillenM.MulveyK. L.HittiA. (2013). Social exclusion in childhood: A developmental intergroup perspective. Child Development, 84(3), 772–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12012
55.
KimH. Y.LaRussoM. D.HsinL. B.HarbaughA. G.SelmanR. L.SnowC. E. (2018). Social perspective-taking performance: Construct, measurement, and relations with academic performance and engagement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 57, 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.05.005
56.
KimI. H.AndersonR. C.MillerB.JeongJ.SwimT. (2011). Influence of cultural norms and collaborative discussions on children’s reflective essays. Discourse Processes, 48(7), 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2011.606098
57.
KimS.LinT.-J.GlassmanM.WenZ.NagpalM.HaS.KraatzE.CashT. (2023). Linking Knowledge Justification with Peers to the Learning of Social Perspective Taking [Unpublished manuscript]. Educational Studies, The Ohio State University.
LiangK.-Y.ZegerS. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
60.
LinT. J.AndersonR. C.JadallahM.Nguyen-JahielK.KimI. H.KuoL. J.LiY. (2015). Social influences on children’s development of relational thinking during small-group discussions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 83–97.
61.
LinT. J.HaS. Y.LiW. T.ChiuY. J.HongY. R.TsaiC. C. (2019). Effects of collaborative small-group discussions on early adolescents’ social reasoning. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2223–2249.
62.
LinT. J.KraatzE.HaS. Y.HsiehM. Y.GlassmanM.NagpalM.ShinS. (2022). Shaping classroom social experiences through collaborative small‐group discussions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 131–154.
63.
LobronA.SelmanR. (2007). The interdependence of social awareness and literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 60(6), 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.60.6.3
64.
MaineF.HofmannR. (2016). Talking for meaning: The dialogic engagement of teachers and children in a small group reading context. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJER.2015.10.007
65.
MastenC. L.EisenbergerN. I.PfeiferJ. H.DaprettoM. (2010). Witnessing peer rejection during early adolescence: Neural correlates of empathy for experiences of social exclusion. Social Neuroscience, 5(5–6), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.490673
66.
MeadG. H. (1938). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.
67.
MischoC. (2005). Promoting perspective coordination by dilemma discussion. The effectiveness of classroom group discussion on interpersonal negotiation strategies of 12–year–old students. Social Psychology of Education, 8(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-004-1884-y
68.
MorrisJ. A.MillerB. W.AndersonR. C.Nguyen-JahielK. T.LinT. J.ScottT.ZhangJ.SunJ.MaS. (2018). Instructional discourse and argumentative writing. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.001
69.
MurphyP. K.GreeneJ. A.AllenE.BaszczewskiS.SwearingenA.WeiL.ButlerA. M. (2018). Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through Quality Talk discussions. Science Education, 102(6), 1239–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21471
70.
NussbaumE. M.EdwardsO. V. (2011). Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students’ reasoning practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 443–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.564567
71.
OswaldP. (1996). The effects of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic concern and altruistic helping. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(5), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9714045
72.
ParkerA. K. (2009). Elementary organizational structures and young adolescents’ self-concept and classroom environment perceptions across the transition to middle school. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(3), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540909594664
73.
PiagetJ. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Harcourt, Brace.
74.
PiagetJ. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structure. University of Chicago press.
75.
PoloC.LundK.PlatinC.NiccolaiG. P. (2016). Group emotions: The social and cognitive functions of emotions in argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9232-8
76.
RealoA.AllikJ.NõlvakA.ValkR.RuusT.SchmidtM.EilolaT. (2003). Mind-reading ability: Beliefs and performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(5), 420–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00021-7
77.
ReynoldsA. J.LeeJ. S. (1991). Factor analyses of measures of home environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(1), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491511018
78.
ReznitskayaA.AndersonR. C.KuoL.-J. (2007). Teaching and learning argumentation. The Elementary School Journal, 107(5), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1086/518623
79.
ReznitskayaA.AndersonR. C.McNurlenB.Nguyen-JahielK.ArchodidouA.KimS. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Process, 32(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3202&3_04
80.
ReznitskayaA.WilkinsonI. A. (2019). Measuring production and comprehension of written arguments in upper-elementary grades. Studia Paedagogica, 24(4), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2019-4-3
81.
ReznitskayaK. L.-J. A.AndersonR. C.GlinaM. (2009). Measuring argumentative reasoning: What’s behind the numbers?Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.001
82.
RichardsonD.BrownL.LagoT. (2008). The Relationship between perspective‐taking and nonaggressive responding in the face of an attack. Journal of Personality, 66(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00011
83.
RipkenC.Jr.CowherdK. (2012). Supper-sized slugger. Disney Book Group.
84.
RyanA. M.ShimS. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents’ social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 672–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.672
85.
SacharL. (1987). There’s a boy in the girls’ bathroom. Yearling.
86.
SchultzL. H.SelmanR.LaRussoM. (2003). The assessment of psychosocial maturity yin children and adolescents. Implications for the evaluation of school-based character edu-cation programs. Journal of Research in Character Education, 1(2), 67–87.
87.
SelmanR. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. Academy Press.
88.
SelmanR. L.FeigenbergL. F. (2010). Between neurons and neighborhoods: Innovative methods to assess the development and depth of adolescent social awareness. In ZelazoP.CroneE.ChandlerM. (Eds.). Developmental social cognitive neuroscience (pp. 227–247). Routledge.
89.
SmagorinskyP. (2018). Emotion, reason, and argument: Teaching persuasive writing in tense Times. English Journal, 107(5), 98.
90.
SmithR. L.RoseA. J. (2011). The “cost of caring” in youths’ friendships: Considering associations among social perspective taking, co-rumination, and empathetic distress. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1792–1803. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025309
91.
TaylorM. D. (1998). The gold Cadillac. Puffin Books.
92.
VygotskyL. S. (2017). The problem of teaching and mental development at school age [Problema obuchenija i umstvennogo razvitija v shkol’nom vozraste]. Changing English, 24(4), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684x.2017.1395165
93.
WalkerC. L.ShoreB. M.TabatabaiD. (2013). Eye of the beholder: Investigating the interplay between inquiry role diversification and social perspective taking. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 2(2), 144–192.
94.
WaltonD. (1992). The place of emotion in argument. Pennsylvania State University Press.
95.
WaltonD. (1998). The new dialectic. University of Toronto Press.
96.
WellsG. (2000). Small group discussion in education. Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In LeeC. D.SmagorinskyP. (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51–85). Cambridge University Press.
97.
WillifordA. P.BrissonD.BenderK. A.JensonJ. M.Forrest-BankS. (2011). Patterns of aggressive behavior and peer victimization from childhood to early adolescence: A latent class analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(6), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9583-9
98.
WolffV. E. (2015). Bat 6. Scholastic.
99.
ZhangX.AndersonR. C.MorrisJ.MillerB.Nguyen-JahielK. T.LinT.-J.ZhangJ.JadallahM.ScottT.SunJ.LatawiecB.MaS.GrabowK.HsuJ. Y.-L. (2016). Improving children’s competence as decision Makers: Contrasting effects of collaborative interaction and direct instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 194–223. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215618663
