Early adolescents are frequent users of online communication tools (OCTs). Yet, we have limited knowledge about how OCTs influence this population and their friendships. We sought opinions of 938 Austrian early adolescents on the role of OCTs for their friendships via a questionnaire and 207 focus groups. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the focus groups. We found that despite the emergence of some online-specific aggression, OCTs are perceived as beneficial for friendships. Early adolescents use online spaces naturally and differentiate little between online and offline communication. Only when it comes to high levels of intimacy, early adolescents also need an offline setting to fulfill their communication need. Online communication tools, especially newer forms such as online gaming, can surpass a mere communicative function and provide a space for building and maintaining friendships. In the future, OCTs should be considered as a tool to facilitate positive development in early adolescents.
AntheunisM. L.SchoutenA. P.KrahmerE. (2014). The role of social networking sites in early adolescents’ social lives. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36, 348-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614564060
4.
ArroyoA.SegrinC. (2011). The relationship between self- and other-perceptions of communication competence and friendship quality. Communication Studies, 62, 547-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.580037
BMBWF. (2018). Information betreffend Einführung der Verbindlichen Übung “Digitale Grundbildung” in der Sekundarstufe 1 im Schuljahr 2018/19 [Information regarding the introduction of the mandatory exercise “Digital Basic Education” in middle school in the school year 2018/19]. Retrieved from https://www.bmbwf.gv.at/Themen/schule/zrp/dibi/dgb.html
8.
BorowskiS. K.ZemanJ.BraunsteinK. (2018). Social anxiety and socioemotional functioning during early adolescence: The mediating role of best friend emotion socialization. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38, 238-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616665212
9.
BourgeoisA.BowerJ.CarrollA. (2014). Social networking and the social and emotional wellbeing of adolescents in Australia. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24, 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2014.14
BrownB. B.KluteC. (2003). Friendships, cliques, and crowds. In AdamsG. R.BerzonskyM. D. (Eds.), Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology. Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 330-348). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
12.
BurkW. J.SteglichC. E.SnijdersT. A. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 397-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077762
13.
ChanG. H. (2020). Intimacy, friendship, and forms of online communication among hidden youth in Hong Kong. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, Article 106407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106407
14.
CuadrosO.BergerC. (2016). The protective role of friendship quality on the wellbeing of adolescents victimized by peers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1877-1888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0504-4
15.
DavisK.CharmaramanL.WeinsteinE. (2019). Introduction to special issue: Adolescent and emerging adult development in an age of social media. Journal of Adolescent Research, 35, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558419886392
16.
DienlinT.MasurP. K.TrepteS. (2017). Reinforcement or displacement? The reciprocity of FtF, IM, and SNS communication and their effects on loneliness and life satisfaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12183
17.
DimmickJ.FeasterJ. C.RamirezA. (2011). The niches of interpersonal media: Relationships in time and space. New Media & Society, 13, 1265-1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811403445
18.
DimmickJ.KlineS.StaffordL. (2016). The gratification niches of personal e-mail and the telephone. Communication Research, 27, 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027002005
19.
EklundL.RomanS. (2017). Do adolescent gamers make friends offline? Identity and friendship formation in school. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 284-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.035
20.
EriksonE. H. (1963). Youth: Change and challenge. New York, NY: Basic books.
21.
Fargas-MaletM.McSherryD.LarkinE.RobinsonC. (2010). Research with children: Methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718x09345412
22.
FoxA. B.BukatkoD.HallahanM.CrawfordM. (2007). The medium makes a difference: Gender similarities and differences in instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07306982
23.
FrankenA.PrinsteinM. J.DijkstraJ. K.SteglichC. E.HarakehZ.VolleberghW. A. (2016). Early adolescent friendship selection based on externalizing behavior: The moderating role of pubertal development. The SNARE study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 1647-1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0134-z
24.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625-635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625
25.
GerwinR. L.KaliebeK.DaigleM. (2018). The interplay between digital media use and development. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 27, 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2017.11.002
26.
GriffithsM. D.DaviesM. N.ChappellD. (2003). Breaking the stereotype: The case of online gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103321167992
27.
HafenC. A.LaursenB.BurkW. J.KerrM.StattinH. (2011). Homophily in stable and unstable adolescent friendships: Similarity breeds constancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 607-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.027
28.
HornsteinG. A.TruesdellS. E. (1988). Development of intimate conversation in close relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1988.7.1.49
29.
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: Author.
30.
JohnsonA. J.WittenbergE.VillagranM. M.MazurM.VillagranP. (2003). Relational progression as a dialectic: Examining turning points in communication among friends. Communication Monographs, 70, 230-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000167415
31.
KnechtA. B.BurkW. J.WeesieJ.SteglichC. (2011). Friendship and alcohol use in early adolescence: A multilevel social network approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 475-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00685.x
32.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x
33.
La GrecaA. M.HarrisonH. M. (2005). Adolescent peer relations, friendships, and romantic relationships: Do they predict social anxiety and depression?Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_5
34.
La GrecaA. M.LopezN. (1998). Social anxiety among adolescents: Linkages with peer relations and friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022684520514
35.
LeeS. J. (2009). Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits more from internet use?Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 509-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01451.x
36.
LenhartA.PurcellK.SmithA.ZickuhrK. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED525056.pdf
37.
LiuD.YangC.-c. (2016). Media niche of electronic communication channels in friendship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 451-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12175
38.
LivingstoneS. (2016). Children’s use of the internet: Reflections on the emerging research agenda. New Media & Society, 5, 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002001
39.
LodderG. M.ScholteR. H.GoossensL.VerhagenM. (2017). Loneliness in early adolescence: Friendship quantity, friendship quality, and dyadic processes. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46, 709-720. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1070352
40.
LoebE. L.DavisA. A.CostelloM. A.AllenJ. P. (2019). Autonomy and relatedness in early adolescent friendships as predictors of short- and long-term academic success. Social Development, 29, 818-836. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12424
41.
LoebE. L.TanJ. S.HesselE. T.AllenJ. P. (2018). Getting what you expect: Negative social expectations in early adolescence predict hostile romantic partnerships and friendships into adulthood. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38, 475-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616675971
42.
MarinoC.GiniG.VienoA.SpadaM. M. (2018a). The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 226, 274-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.007
43.
MarinoC.GiniG.VienoA.SpadaM. M. (2018b). A comprehensive meta-analysis on problematic Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.009
MazurE.KozarianL. (2009). Self-presentation and interaction in blogs of adolescents and young emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558409350498
46.
MerryS. N.StasiakK.ShepherdM.FramptonC.FlemingT.LucassenM. F. (2012). The effectiveness of SPARX, a computerised self help intervention for adolescents seeking help for depression: Randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ, 344, Article e2598. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2598
47.
MillerK. S.FasulaA. M.LinC. Y.LevinM. L.WyckoffS. C.ForehandR. (2012). Ready, set, go: African American preadolescents’ sexual thoughts, intentions, and behaviors. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610393247
NesiJ.Choukas-BradleyS.PrinsteinM. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1—A theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21, 267-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500402447
52.
PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M.SchoutenA. P. (2006). Characteristics and motives of adolescents talking with strangers on the internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 526-530. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.526
53.
PreciadoP.SnijdersT. A.BurkW. J.StattinH.KerrM. (2012). Does proximity matter? Distance dependence of adolescent friendships. Social Networks, 34, 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.01.002
54.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2018). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 12). Doncaster, VIC, Australia: Author.
55.
QuinnS.OldmeadowJ. A. (2013). Is the igeneration a “we” generation? Social networking use among 9- to 13-year-olds and belonging. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12007
56.
ReichS. M.SubrahmanyamK.EspinozaG. (2012). Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents’ online and offline social networks. Developmental Psychology, 48, 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026980
57.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
58.
RideoutV. J.FoehrU. G.RobertsD. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527859.pdf
59.
ShapiroL. A. S.MargolinG. (2014). Growing up wired: Social networking sites and adolescent psychosocial development. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 17, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-013-0135-1
60.
SievingR. E.PerryC. L.WilliamsC. L. (2000). Do friendships change behaviors, or do behaviors change friendships? Examining paths of influence in young adolescents’ alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00056-7
61.
SongH.Zmyslinski-SeeligA.KimJ.DrentA.VictorA.OmoriK.AllenM. (2014). Does Facebook make you lonely? A meta analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 446-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.011
SubrahmanyamK.GreenfieldP. (2008). Online communication and adolescent relationships. The Future of Children, 18, 119-146. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0006
64.
TanJ. (2010). Grounded theory in practice: Issues and discussion for new qualitative researchers. Journal of Documentation, 66, 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011016380
65.
ThrouvalaM. A.GriffithsM. D.RennoldsonM.KussD. J. (2019). Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: A qualitative focus group study. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.012
66.
TsitsikaA. K.TzavelaE. C.JanikianM.OlafssonK.IordacheA.SchoenmakersT. M.…RichardsonC. (2014). Online social networking in adolescence: Patterns of use in six European countries and links with psychosocial functioning. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.010
67.
UhlsY. T.GreenfieldP. (2012). The value of fame: Preadolescent perceptions of popular media and their relationship to future aspirations. Developmental Psychology, 48, 315-326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026369
68.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007a). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement Hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1169-1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x
69.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007b). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
70.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020
71.
ValkenburgP. M.PiotrowskiJ. T. (2017). Plugged in: How media attract and affect youth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
72.
Van HarmelenA.-L.KievitR.IoannidisK.NeufeldS.JonesP.BullmoreE.… ConsortiumN. (2017). Adolescent friendships predict later resilient functioning across psychosocial domains in a healthy community cohort. Psychological Medicine, 47, 2312-2322. https://doi.org/:10.1017/S0033291717000836
73.
VannucciA.OhannessianC. M. (2019). Social media use subgroups differentially predict psychosocial well-being during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 1469-1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01060-9
74.
VeltriN.KrasnovaH.BaumannA.KalayamthanamN. (2014, August). Gender differences in online gaming: A literature review. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, USA. https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.68896
WentzelK. R.BarryC. M.CaldwellK. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.195
77.
WentzelK. R.CaldwellK. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Realtions to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198-1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01994.x
78.
WilliamsD.YeeN.CaplanS. E. (2008). Who plays, how much, and why? Debunking the stereotypical gamer profile. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 993-1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00428.x
79.
WilligC.RogersW. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London, England: SAGE.
80.
YangC.-c.BrownB. B.BraunM. T. (2013). From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of electronic intimacy in college students’ interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 16, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472486
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
