The current study investigated the associations of students’ social status (likeability, popularity, & unlikability) and teacher student relationships with their academic engagement and achievement. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted using self-report and peer nomination data from 996 students (398 fifth graders in elementary school & 383 seventh graders in middle school). Likeability was positively associated with GPA and achievement scores, unlikability was negatively associated with students’ behavioral engagement, GPA, and reading achievement, and the relation of popularity with students’ engagement depended on their teacher-student relationships. Disliked seventh graders reported lower engagement and GPA than disliked fifth graders, with these effects mediated by their teacher-student relationships. The results demonstrate the importance of considering peer and teacher relationships jointly to understand early adolescent academic adjustment.
AllenJ. P.LoebE. L. (2015). The autonomy‐connection challenge in adolescent–peer relationships. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12111
2.
ArchambaultI.Lampron-de SouzaS.Lamanque-BélangerC.PascalS.PaganiL. S.DupéréV. (2023). Low peer acceptance and classroom engagement: The protective role of elementary school teacher-student relationships for immigrant-background students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 44(7), Article 02724316231212559. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316231212559
3.
BellmoreA. (2011). Peer rejection and unpopularity: Associations with GPAs across the transition to middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023312
4.
BrassN. R.RyanA. M. (2021). Changes in behavioral correlates of social status during early adolescence: Does school context matter? 13.
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1994). Ecological models of human development. International encyclopedia of education, 3(2), 37–43.
6.
BrownB. B.LarsonJ. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (p. adlpsy002004). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004
7.
BuhsE. (2009). Victimization and exclusion: Links to peer rejection, classroom engagement, and achievement. In JimersonS. R.SwearerS. M.EspelageD. L. (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools (0 ed., pp. 173–182). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864968-16
8.
BukowskiW. M. (2011). Popularity as a social concept: Meanings and significance. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 3–25). The Guilford Press.
9.
CillessenA. H. N.BergY. H. M. (2012). Popularity and school adjustment. In Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–164). IAP Information Age Publishing.
10.
CillessenA. H. N.MarksP. E. L. (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. In MarksP. E. L.CillessenA. H. N. (Eds.), New directions in peer nomination methodology (157, pp. 21–44). New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20206
11.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
12.
CoplanR. J.SchneiderB. H.OoiL. L.HipsonW. E. (2018). Peer based interventions for behaviorally inhibited, socially withdrawn, and socially anxious children. In BukowskiW.LaursenB.RubinK. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 657–675). Guildford Press.
13.
DawesM.XieH. (2017). The trajectory of popularity goal during the transition to middle school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(6), 852–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615626301
14.
De LaetS.DoumenS.VervoortE.ColpinH.Van LeeuwenK.GoossensL.VerschuerenK. (2014). Transactional links between teacher-child relationship quality and perceived versus sociometric popularity: A three-wave longitudinal study. Child Development, 85(4), 1647–1662. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12216
15.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC.WigfieldA.BuchananC. M.ReumanD.FlanaganC.IverD. M. (1993). Development during adolescence. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
16.
EcclesJ. S.RoeserR. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Individual bases of adolescent development (pp. 404–434). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001013
17.
EngelsM. C.ColpinH.Van LeeuwenK.BijttebierP.Den NoortgateW. V.ClaesS.GoossensL.VerschuerenK. (2017). School engagement trajectories in adolescence: The role of peer likeability and popularity. Journal of School Psychology, 64, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.006
18.
EngelsM. C.ColpinH.Van LeeuwenK.BijttebierP.Van Den NoortgateW.ClaesS.GoossensL.VerschuerenK. (2016). Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher–student relationships in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0414-5
19.
EngelsM. C.ColpinH.WoutersS.Van LeeuwenK.BijttebierP.Van Den NoortgateW.GoossensL.VerschuerenK. (2019). Adolescents’ peer status profiles and differences in school engagement and loneliness trajectories: A person-centered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 75, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101759
20.
FeldlauferH.MidgleyC.EcclesJ. (1988). Student, Teacher, and Observer Perceptions of the Classroom Environment Before and After the Transition to Junior High School. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431688082003
21.
FurrerC.SkinnerE. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
22.
GarnerR.BootcheckJ.LorrM.RauchK. (2006). The adolescent society revisited: Cultures, crowds, climates, and status structures in seven secondary schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(6), 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9060-7
23.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x
24.
LeaseA. M.MusgroveK. T.AxelrodJ. L. (2002). Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Social Development, 11(4), 508–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00213
25.
ParkhurstJ. T.HopmeyerA. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018002001
26.
PrewettS. L.BerginD. A.HuangF. L. (2019). Student and teacher perceptions on student-teacher relationship quality: A middle school perspective. School Psychology International, 40(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318807743
27.
RandallJ.EngelhardG. (2009). Differences between teachers’ grading practices in elementary and middle schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.3.175-186
28.
RoordaD. L.KoomenH. M. Y.SpiltJ. L.OortF. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
29.
RyanA. M.ShinH. (2018). Peers, academics, and teachers. In BukowskiW. M.LaursenB.RubinK. H. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 637–656). The Guilford Press.
30.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist.
31.
SandstromM. J.CillessenA. H. N. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406072789
32.
SchwartzD.GormanA. H. (2011). The high price of high status. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 245–270). The Guilford Press.
33.
SkinnerE. A.BelmontM. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.85.4.571
34.
SkinnerE. A.KindermannT. A.FurrerC. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
35.
SkinnerE. A.RickertN. P.VolletJ. W.KindermannT. A. (2022). The complex social ecology of academic development: A bioecological framework and illustration examining the collective effects of parents, teachers, and peers on student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2038603
36.
SkinnerE. A.WellbornJ. G.ConnellJ. P. (1990). What it takes to Do well in school and whether i’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22
37.
WeiL.JinS.ChristS.FrenchD. C. (2023). Longitudinal associations between popularity, peer acceptance, and academic performance in adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 47(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254231198040
38.
WentzelK. R. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531–547). The Guilford Press.
39.
WilsonT.KarimpourR.RodkinP. C. (2011). African American and European American students’ peer groups during early adolescence: Structure, status, and academic achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610387143
40.
ZhangX.PomerantzE. M.QinL.LogisH.RyanA. M.WangM. (2019). Early adolescent social status and academic engagement: Selection and influence processes in the United States and China. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1300–1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000333
