The indirect effects of moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring on traditional victimization and bullying via cyberbullying involvement were examined in a diverse sample of 800 youth in Grades 3 to 8. After controlling for grade and gender, moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring had an indirect effect on traditional victimization and bullying through cyberbullying involvement. Moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring had a direct effect on traditional bullying. Results suggest that moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring affect cyberbullying involvement and additionally impact experiences beyond the cyber context.
AlmeidaA.CorreiaI.MarinhoS.GarciaD. (2012). Virtual but not less real: A study of cyberbullying and its relations to moral disengagement and empathy. In LiQ.CrossD.SmithP. K. (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 223-244). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
2.
BalakrishnanV. (2015). Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia: The roles of gender, age and Internet frequency. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 149-157. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.021
3.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
4.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
5.
BanduraA. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101-119. doi:10.1080/0305724022014322
6.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorellaC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-374. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
7.
BaumanS. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 803-833. doi:10.1177/0272431609350927
8.
BaumanS. (2013). Cyberbullying: What does research tell us?Theory Into Practice, 52, 249-256. doi:10.1080/00405841.2013.829727
9.
BaumanS.PeroH. (2011). Bullying and cyberbullying among deaf students and their hearing peers: An exploratory study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 236-253. doi:10.1093/deafed/enq043
10.
BaumanS.TatumT. (2009). Web sites for young children: Gateway to online social networking?Professional School Counseling, 13, 1-10. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2010-13.1
11.
BaumanS.ToomeyR. B.WalkerJ. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 341-350. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001
12.
BonannoR. A.HymelS. (2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 685-697. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9937-1
13.
BusseyK.FitzpatrickS.RamanA. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14, 30-46. doi:10.1080/15388220.2014.954045
14.
CardN. A.IsaacsJ.HodgesE. V. E. (2007). Correlates of school victimization: Implications for prevention and intervention. In ZinsJ. E.EliasM. J.MaherC. A. (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 339-366). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
15.
CardN. A.StuckyB. D.SawalaniG. M.LittleT. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185-1229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x
16.
CasperD. M.MeterD. J.CardN. A. (2015). Addressing measurement issues related to bullying involvement. School Psychology Review, 44, 353-371.
17.
CassidyW.JacksonM.BrownK. N. (2009). Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students’ experiences with cyber-bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 383-402. doi:10.1177/0143034309106948
18.
DempseyA. G.SulkowskiM. L.DempseyJ.StorchE. A. (2011). Has cyber technology produced a new group of peer aggressors?CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 297-302. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0108
19.
Erdu-BakerÖ. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender, and frequent and risky usage of Internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12, 109-125. doi:10.1177/1461444809341260
20.
FantiK. A.DemetriouA. G.HawaV. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 168-181. doi:10.1080/17405629
21.
GiniG.PozzoliT.HymelS. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 56-68. doi:10.1002/ab.21502
22.
GladdenR. M.Vivolo-KantorA. M.HamburgerM. E.LumpkinC. D. (2014). Bullying surveillance among youth: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Education.
23.
GradingerP.StrohmeierD.SchillerE. M.StefanekE.SpielC. (2012). Cyber-victimization and popularity in early adolescence: Stability and predictive associations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 228-243. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.643171
24.
HawkerD. S. J.BoultonM. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441-455. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00629
25.
HaynieD. L.NanselT.EitelP.CrumpA. D.SaylorK.YuK.Simons-MortonB. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29-49. doi:10.1177/0272431601021001002
26.
JimersonS. R.SwearerS. M.EspelageD. L. (2010). International scholarship advances science and practice addressing bullying in schools. In JimersonS. R.SwearerS. M.EspelageD. L. (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 1-6). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
JuvonenJ.GrossE. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496-505. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x
28.
KärnäA.VoetenM.LittleT. D.PoskipartaE.KaljonenA.SalmivalliC. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82, 311-330. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x
29.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, S13-S20. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018
30.
KowalskiR. M.MorganC. A.LimberS. P. (2012). Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. School Psychology International, 33, 505-519. doi:10.1177/0143034312445244
31.
LawD. M.ShapkaJ. D.HymelS.OlsonB. F.WaterhouseT. (2012). The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and Internet bullying and victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 226-232. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.004
32.
LenhartA.PurcellK.SmithA.ZickuhrK. (2010). Social media & mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Millennials, Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED525056.pdf
33.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151-173. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
35.
LittleT. D.JorgensenT. D.LangK. M.MooreE. W. G. (2014). On the joys of missing data. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 151-162. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jst048
36.
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
MenesiniE.SpielC. (2012). Introduction: Cyberbullying: Development, consequences, risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 163-167. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.652833
38.
MeschG. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 387-393. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0068
39.
MishnaF.SainiM.SolomonS. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth’s perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1222-1228. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.004
40.
MonksC. P.RobinsonS.WorlidgeP. (2012). The emergence of cyberbullying: A survey of primary school pupils’ perceptions and experiences. School Psychology International, 33, 477-491. doi:10.1177/0143034312445242
41.
ObermannM. (2011). Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 133-144. doi:10.1002/ab.20378
42.
OlweusD. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In RubinK.PeplerD. (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
OlweusD. (2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon?European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 520-538. doi:10.1080/17405629.2012.682358
44.
PalladinoB. E.NocentiA.MenesiniE. (2016). Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the NoTrap! program in two independent trials. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 194-206. doi:10.1002/ab.21636
45.
PearceN.CrossD.MonksH.WatersS.FalconerS. (2011). Current evidence of best practice in whole-school bullying intervention and its potential to inform cyberbullying interventions. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 21, 1-21. doi:10.1375/ajgc.21.1.1
46.
PerrenS.Gutzwiller-HelfenfingerE. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 195-209. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.643168
47.
PolaninJ. R.EspelageD. L.PigottT. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47-65.
48.
PornariC. D.WoodJ. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81-94. doi:10.1002/ab.20336
49.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
ŞAHİNM. (2012). The relationship between the cyberbullying/cybervictmization and loneliness among adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 834-837. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.010
52.
SalmivalliC.KärnäA.PoskipartaE. (2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 405-411. doi:10.1177/0165025411407457
53.
SchlomerG. L.BaumanS.CardN. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 1-10. doi:10.1037/a0018082
54.
SmithP. K.MoritaY.Junger-TasJ.OlweusD.CatalanoR.SleeP. (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
TokunagaR. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277-287. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014
VandeboschH.Van CleemputK. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11, 1349-1371. doi:10.1177/1461444809341263
59.
VernbergE. M.JacobsA. K.HershbergerS. L. (1999). Peer victimization and attitudes about violence during early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 386-395. doi:10.1207/S15374424jccp280311
60.
YbarraM. L.BoydD.KorchmarosJ. D.OppenheimJ. (2012). Definition and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 53-58. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.031
61.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J.WolakJ.FinkelhorD. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: Findings from the second youth Internet safety survey. Pediatrics, 118, e1169-e1177. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0815
62.
ZhouZ.TangH.TianY.WeiH.ZhangF.MorrisonC. M. (2013). Cyberbullying and its risk factors among Chinese high school students. School Psychology International, 34, 630-647. doi:10.1177/0143034313479692
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
