The study examined individual factors and social factors that influence adolescent students’ achievement in mathematics. The predictive model suggested direct positive effects of student intelligence, self-rated openness and parental education on achievement in mathematics, whereas direct effects of extraversion on measures of achievement were negative. Indirect positive effects of intelligence, self-rated conscientiousness, student-perceived mathematics teacher’s press for understanding and mastery goal, and a negative effect of student-rated parental academic pressure on course achievement were mediated through the students’ self-efficacy in mathematics. The findings highlight the important role that individual differences in ability and personality, as well as student perceptions of parent and teacher academically related variables, play in the students’ performance in mathematics.
AckermanP. L.HaggestadE. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219-245.
2.
AlarcónM.KnopikV. S.DeFriesJ. C. (2000). Covariation of mathematics achievement and general cognitive ability in twins. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 63-77.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
BarbaranelliC.CapraraV. G.RabascaA.PastorelliC. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 645-664.
6.
BratkoD.Chamorro-PremuzicT.SaksZ. (2006). Personality and school performance: Incremental validity of self- and peer-rating over intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 131-142.
7.
BrekelmansM.WubbelsT.LevyJ. (1993). Student performance, attitudes, instructional strategies and teacher-communication style. In WubbelsT.LevyJ. (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relations in education (pp. 56-63). London, UK: Palmer.
8.
CampbellJ. R. (1994). Developing cross-cultural/cross-national instruments: Cross-national methods and procedures. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 775-784.
9.
CampbellJ. R.MandelF. (1990). Connecting math achievement to parental influences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 64-74.
10.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2005). Personality and intellectual competence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2006). Intellectual competence and the intelligent personality: A third way in differential psychology. Review of General Psychology, 10, 251-267.
12.
ChiuM. M.KlassenR. M. (2010). Relations of mathematics self-concept and its calibration with mathematics achievement: Cultural differences among fifteen-year-olds in 34 countries. Learning and Instruction, 20, 2-17.
13.
ChiuM. M.XihuaZ. (2008). Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction, 18, 321-336.
14.
DearyI. J.StrandS.SmithP.FernandesC. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35, 13-21.
15.
FanX.ChenM. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1-22.
16.
FastL. A.LewisJ. L.BryantM. J.BocianK. A.CardulloR. A.RettigM.HammondK. A. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance?Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 729-740.
17.
FurnhamA.Chamorro-PremuzicT.McDougallF. (2003). Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 47-64.
18.
GoodnowC. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.
19.
Gonzalez-DeHassA.WillemsP. P.Doan HolbeinM. F. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 99-123.
20.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (1991). The inner resources for school performance: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 508-517.
21.
GrolnickW. S.SlowiaczekJ. L. (1994). Parental involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237-252.
22.
HalversonC. F.HavillV. L.DealJ.BakerS. R.VictorB. J.PavlopoulosV.. . . WenL. (2003). Personality structure as derived from parental ratings of free descriptions of children: The Inventory of Child Individual Differences. Journal of Personality, 71, 995-1026.
23.
HuntsingerC. S.JoseP. E.LiawF.-R.ChingW.-D. (1997). Cultural differences in early mathematics learning: A comparison of Euro-American, Chinese-American, and Taiwan-Chinese Families. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 371-388.
24.
Japelj PavešićB. (2004). Znanje, ocene in učenje v osemletki in devetletki [Knowledge, grades and studying in the 9-year and 8-year elementary schools]. Šolsko polje, 15(5/6), 107-130.
25.
JensenA. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
KaplanA.MidgleyC. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of classroom goal structure and early adolescents’ affect in school: The mediating role of coping strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 187-212.
27.
KnyazevG. G.ZupančičM.SlobodskayaH. R. (2008). Child personality in Slovenia and Russia: Structure and mean level of traits in parent and self-ratings. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 39, 317-334.
28.
KokkoK.BergmanL. R.PulkkinenL. (2003). Child personality characteristics and selection into long-term unemployment in Finnish and Swedish longitudinal samples. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 134-144.
29.
KoutsoulisM. K.CampbellJ. R. (2001). Family processes affect students’ motivation, and science and math achievement in Cypriot high schools. Structural Equation Modelling, 1, 108-127.
30.
LaidraK.PullmannH.AllikJ. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 441-451.
31.
LittleT. D.MiyashitaT.KarasawaM.MashimaM.OettingenG.AzumaH.BaltesP. B. (2003). The links among action-control beliefs, intellective skill, and school performance in Japanese, US, and German school children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 41-48.
32.
LynnR. (2010). High IQ is sufficient to explain the high achievements in math and science of the East Asian peoples. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 567-568.
33.
MackintoshN. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
MarchantG. J.PaulsonS. E.RothlisbergB. A. (2001). Relations of middle school students’ perceptions of family and school contexts with academic achievement. Psychology in the School, 6, 505-519.
35.
MarshH. W.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.KöllerO.BaumertJ. (2006). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74, 403-456.
36.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
37.
MervieldeI.De FruytF. (2002). Assessing children’s traits with the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children. In De RaadB.PeruginiM. (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 129-146). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Hoger.
38.
MervieldeI.BuystV.De FruytF. (1995). The validity of the Big-Five as a model for teachers’ ratings of individual differences among children aged 4-12 years. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 525-534.
39.
MiddletonM. J.MidgleyC. (2002). Beyond motivation: Middle school students’ perceptions of press for understanding in math. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 373-391.
40.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE. M.AndermanL. H.FreemanK. E.. . . UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
41.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
42.
O’ConnorM.PaunonenS. V. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971-990.
43.
PajaresF.KranzlerJ. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426-443.
44.
PajaresF.MillerM. D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics outcomes: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 42, 190-198.
45.
PatrickH.RyanA. M.KaplanA. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 83-98.
46.
PomerantzE. M.MoormanE. A.LitwackS. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373-410.
47.
PuklekM. (2001). Razvoj psihološkega osamosvajanja mladostnikov v različnih socialnih kontekstih [The development of adolescent psychological individuation in different social contexts] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
48.
Puklek LevpuščekM.ZupančičM. (2009). Math achievement in early adolescence: The role of parental involvement, teachers’ behavior, and students’ motivational beliefs about math. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 541-570.
49.
RavenJ.RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H. (1999). Priročnik za Ravenove progresivne matrice in besedne lestvice [Raven’s Progressive matrices and verbal scales. Manual]. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Psychological Test Publishing, Assessment, and Consultancy.
50.
RindermanH.NeubauerA. C. (2004). Processing speed, intelligence, creativity, and school performance: Testing of causal hypothesis using structural equation models. Intelligence, 32, 573-589.
51.
RohdeT. E.ThompsonL. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35, 83-92.
52.
SchunkD. H.PajaresF. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 16-32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53.
SlobodskayaH. R. (2007). The associations among the big five, behavioural inhibition and behavioural approach systems and child and adolescent adjustment in Russia. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 913-924.
54.
SinghK.GranvilleM.DikaS. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323-332.
55.
SirinS. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453.
56.
Smrtnik VitulićH.ZupančičM. (2010). Robust and mid-level personality traits as predictors of adolescents’ academic achievement in secondary school. Suvremena psihologija, 13, 203-219.
57.
Smrtnik VitulićH.ZupančičM. (2011). Personality traits as a predictor of academic achievement in adolescents. Educational Studies, 37, 127-140.
58.
SteinbergL.LambornS. D.DornbuschS. M.DarlingN. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266-1281.
59.
SteinmayrR.BippT.SpinathB. (2011). Goal orientations predict academic performance beyond intelligence and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 196-200.
60.
TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.RobertsB. W.SchnyderI.NiggliA. (2009). Different forces, same consequence: Conscientiousness and competence beliefs are independent predictors of academic effort and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1115-1128.
61.
UrdanT.MidgleyC. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and patterns of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524-551.
62.
UrdanT.SchoenfelderE. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331-349.
63.
UsherE. L.PajaresF. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 89-101.
64.
ValentineJ. C.DuBoisD. L.CooperH. (2004). The relation between self beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111-133.
65.
VitaroF.TrembleyR. E.BrendgenM.LaroseS. (2005). Kindergarten disruptive behaviors, protective factors, and educational achievement in early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 617-629.
66.
WatkinsM. W.LeiP. W.CanivezG. L. (2007). Psychometric intelligence and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Intelligence, 35, 59-68.
67.
WentzelK. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411-419.
68.
WhiteK. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461-481.
ZupančičM.KavčičT. (2009). Vprašalnik medosebnih razlik pri otrocih in mladostnikih VMR-OM: Priročnik [Inventory of child and adolescent individual differences ICID: Manual]. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Psychological Test Publishing, Assessment, and Consultancy.
71.
ZupančičM.KavčičT. (2011). Predicting early academic achievement: The role of higher- versus lower-order personality traits. Psihologija, 44, 295-306.
72.
ZupančičM.VidmarM. (2010). Osebnostne poteze v otroštvu; vzdolžna in sočasna napoved spoznavnih značilnosti pri prvošolcih [Personality traits in childhood: Longitudinal and contemporaneous prediction of cognitive characteristics in firstgraders]. School Field, 21, 29-50.
