This study seeks to establish the relevance of middle school students’ naïve beliefs about knowledge and learning in science to their achievement motivation in this domain. A predominantly Hispanic and lower-income sample of 459 middle school students (sixth through eighth grades) completed measures of epistemic beliefs along with several measures of motivation. Results indicated that a belief that scientific knowledge develops and that justification is necessary to valid knowledge in science were positively related to mastery goals, task value, and self-efficacy. Epistemic beliefs were also found to predict science grades over and above the contributions of motivational factors. Surprisingly, an uncritical acceptance of authority figures and a belief in scientific knowledge as certain were more typical of students who adopted motivational states (e.g., mastery goals) previously found to be supportive of learning. The latter findings may be unique to early adolescence within the ethnic and socioeconomic status parameters of the present sample.
Ames, C. ( 1992). Classrooms: Goals, structure, and student motivation . Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
2.
Bandura, A. ( 1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
3.
Baxter Magolda, M.B. ( 1992). Students’ epistemologies and academic experiences: Implications for pedagogy. Review of Higher Education, 15, 265-287.
4.
Baxter Magolda, M.B. ( 1998). Learning and gender: Complexity and possibility. Higher Education, 35, 351-355.
5.
Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. ( 1986). Women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Boyes, M., & Chandler, M.J. (1992). Cognitive development, epistemic doubt, and identity formation in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21(3), 277-304.
7.
Braten, I., & Olaussen, B.S. (2005). Profiling individual differences in student motivation: A longitudinal cluster-analytic studying different academic contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 359-396.
8.
Braten, I., & Stromso, H.I. ( 2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 371-388.
9.
Buehl, M.M., & Alexander, P.A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles . American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 697-726.
10.
California Department of Education. (2003). Science content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through Grade 12. Sacramento, CA: CDE Press .
11.
Carpendale, J.I.M., & Chandler, M.J. (1996). On the distinction between false belief understanding and the acquisition of an interpretive theory of mind. Child Development, 66, 1686-1706.
12.
Chan, K.W., & Elliott, R.G. ( 2000). Exploratory study of epistemological beliefs of Hong Kong teacher education students: Resolving conceptual and empirical issues . Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 225-234.
13.
Chan, K.W., & Elliott, R.G. ( 2004). Epistemological beliefs across cultures: Critique and analysis of beliefs structure studies. Educational Psychology , 24(2), 123-142.
14.
Conley, A.M., Pintrich, P.R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. ( 2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186-204.
15.
DeBacker, T.K., & Crowson, H.M. ( 2006). Influences on cognitive engagement: Epistemological beliefs and need for closure. British Journal of Educational Psychology , 76, 535-551.
16.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. ( 1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
17.
Dunbar, K. ( 1993). Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 17, 397-434.
18.
Dupeyrat, C., & Marine, C. ( 2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 30, 43-59.
19.
Dweck, C.S., (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
20.
Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, E.L. ( 1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality . Psychological Review, 95, 256-272.
21.
Dweck, C.S., & Molden, D.C. ( 2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J. Elliot and C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122-140). New York: Guilford .
22.
Elliot, A.J., & Church, M.A. ( 1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
23.
Elliot, A.J., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-476.
24.
Garofalo, J. ( 1989). Beliefs and their influence on mathematical performance . Mathematics Teacher, 82, 502-505.
25.
Gottlieb, E. ( 2007). Learning how to believe: Epistemic development in cultural context. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 5-35.
26.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C.S. ( 2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541-553.
27.
Hallet, D., Chandler, M.J., & Krettenaur, T. (2002). Disentangling the course of epistemic development: Parsing knowledge by epistemic content. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 285-307.
28.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. ( 2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Hayamizu, T., & Weiner, B. ( 1991). A test of Dweck’s model of achievement goals as related to perceptions of ability. Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 226-234.
30.
Hofer, B.K. ( 1999). Instructional context in the college mathematics classroom: Epistemological beliefs and student motivation. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organizational Development, 16, 73-82.
31.
Hofer, B.K. ( 2002). Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: An introduction. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 3-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Hofer, B.K., & Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning . Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 88-140.
33.
Kant, I. ( 1990). Critique of pure reason (J. M. D. Meiklejohn, Trans.) . Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books . (Original work published 1781)
34.
Karabenick, S.A., & Moosa, S. ( 2005). Cultural and personal epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern students’ beliefs about scientific knowledge and knowing. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 275-293.
35.
Kardash, C., & Scholes, R.J. ( 1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260-271.
Kitchener, R.F. ( 2002). Folk epistemology: An introduction. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 89-105.
38.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. ( 2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
39.
Lodewyk, K.R. ( 2007). Relations among epistemological beliefs, academic achievement, and task performance in secondary school students. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 307-327.
40.
Luykx, A., Lee, O., Mahotiere, M., Lester, B., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. ( 2007). Cultural and home language influences on children’s responses to science assessments. Teachers College Record , 109(4), 897-926.
41.
Maggioni, L., Riconscente, M.M., & Alexander, P.A. (2006). Perceptions of knowledge and beliefs among undergraduate students in Italy and the United States. Learning and Instruction, 16, 467-491.
42.
Mansfield, A.F., & Clinchy, B.M. ( 2002). Toward the integration of objectivity and subjectivity: Epistemological development from 10 to 16. New Ideas in Psychology , 20, 225-262.
43.
Middleton, M.J., & Midgley, C. ( 1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710-718.
44.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M.L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L.H., et al. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113-131.
45.
Millar, A. ( 1991). Reasons and experience. New York: Clarendon.
46.
Muis, K.R. ( 2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research , 74(3), 317-377.
47.
Muis, K.R., Bendixen, L.D., & Haerle, F.C. ( 2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review , 18(1), 3-54.
48.
Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59-74.
49.
Nicholls, J.G. ( 1984). Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 1. Student motivation (pp. 39-73). New York: Academic Press.
50.
Oh, S., & Jonassen, D.H. (2007). Scaffolding and online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 95-110.
51.
Patrick, H., & Yoon, C. ( 2004). Early adolescents’ motivation during science investigation . Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 319-328.
52.
Pillow, B.H., & Henrichon, A.J. (1996). There’s more to the picture than meets the eye: Young children’s difficulty understanding biased interpretation, Child Development, 67, 803-819.
53.
Pintrich, P.R. ( 2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology , 92(3), 544-555.
54.
Pintrich, P.R., & DeGroot, E.V., (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
55.
Ravindran, B., Greene, B.A., & DeBacker, T.K. (2005). Predicting pre-service teachers’ cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs . The Journal of Educational Research, 98(4), 222-232.
56.
Reich, K.H., Oser, F.K., & Valentin, P. ( 1994). Knowing why I now know better: Children’s and youth’s explanations of their worldview changes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4(1), 151-173.
57.
Ricco, R.B., & Rodriguez, P. ( 2006). The relation of personal epistemology to parenting style and goal orientation in college mothers. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 159-178.
58.
Robins, R.W., & Pals, J.L. ( 2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1, 313-336.
59.
Rosebery, A.S., Warren, B., & Conant, F.R. ( 1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61-94.
60.
Roth, W.M., & Roychaoudburgh, A. (1994). Physics students’ epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 5-30.
61.
Rothbart, D. ( 1998). Extending Popper’s epistemology to the lab. Dialectica: International Journal of Philosophy of Knowledge, 52(3), 247-254.
62.
Sandoval, W.A. ( 2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education , 89(4), 634-656.
63.
Sandoval, W.A., & Morrison, K. ( 2003). High school students’ ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369-392.
64.
Schoenfeld, A.H. ( 1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Beliefs systems, social conditions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance . Cognitive Science, 7, 329-363.
65.
Schoenfeld, A.H. ( 1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
66.
Schommer, M. ( 1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension . Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
67.
Schommer, M. ( 1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology , 85, 1-6.
68.
Schommer, M. ( 1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In R. Garner & P. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and about text instruction (pp. 25-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
69.
Schommer, M. ( 1998). The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 551-562.
70.
Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G., & Bajaj, A. ( 1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology , 89, 37-40.
71.
Schommer, M., Course, A., & Rhodes, N. ( 1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 435-443.
72.
Schommer, M., & Walker, K. ( 1997). Epistemological beliefs and valuing school: Considerations for college admissions and retention. Research in Higher Education , 38, 173-186.
73.
Schommer-Aikins, M. ( 2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19-29.
74.
Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O.K., & Hutter, R. ( 2005). Epistemological beliefs, mathematical problem-solving beliefs, and academic performance of middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 105(3), 289-303.
75.
Schommer-Aikins, M., Mau, W.C., Brookhart, S., & Hutter, R. ( 2000). Understanding middle students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning using a multidimensional paradigm. Journal of Educational Research, 94(2), 120-127.
76.
Smith, C.L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M.G. (2000). Sixth grade students’ epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 349-422.
77.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., & Scott, L. ( 1994). Pupils’ images of scientific epistemology. International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 361-373.
78.
Stoeger, H. ( 2006). First steps toward an epistemic learner model. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 17-41.
Trautwein, U., & Ludtke, O. ( 2007). Epistemological beliefs, school achievement, and college major: A large-scale longitudinal study on the impact of certainty beliefs . Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 348-366.
81.
Vandewalle, D. ( 1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015.
82.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. ( 2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
83.
Wigfield, A., Hoa, L.W., & Klauda, S.L. ( 2008). The role of achievement values in the regulation of achievement behaviors. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 169-195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
84.
Yang, F. ( 2005). Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology. Educational Studies, 31(1), 65-84.
