This study presents findings from a series of focus groups conducted to explore parent and professional experiences and perspectives regarding inclusion and early intervention. The 45 focus group participants consisted of 13 parents of young children (birth through 5 years) with disabilities and 32 professionals representing service providers and administrators from an array of human services programs and agencies such as child care, early intervention, social services, public health, mental health, and public schools. The focus groups were organized to address (a) participants' awareness of early intervention services, (b) their perceptions of barriers and supports to inclusion, (c) their notions of service coordination, (d) their experiences with a statewide initiative to improve early childhood services for all children, and (e) their views of what an ideal system of early intervention would look like. Results revealed four overarching themes, most notable of which distinguish between parents' and professionals' abilities to describe the current early intervention system and to envision an ideal system of services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Able-Boone, H., Goodwin, L. D., Sandall, S. R., Gordon, N., & Martin, D. G. (1992). Consumer based early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 201–209
2.
Able-Boone, H., Sandall, S., Loughry, A., & Frederick, L. (1990). An informed, family-centered approach to Public Law 99--457: Parental views. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 100–111
3.
Bailey, D. B., Buysse, V., Edmondson, R., & Smith, T. (1992). Creating family-centered services in early intervention: Perceptions of professionals in four states. Exceptional Children, 58, 298–309
4.
Bailey, D. B., & Simeonsson, R. J. (1988). Assessing needs of families with handicapped infants. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 117–127
5.
Bailey, D. B., & Winton, P. J. (1987). Stability and change in parents' expectations about mainstreaming. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7, 73–88
6.
Brotherson, M. J. (1994). Interactive focus group interviewing: A qualitative research method in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 101–118
7.
Brotherson, M. J., & Goldstein, B. L. (1992). Time as a resource and constraint for parents of young children with disabilities: Implications for early intervention services. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 508–527
8.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
9.
Garshelis, J. A., & McConnell, S. R. (1993). Comparison of family needs assessed by mothers, individual professionals, and interdisciplinary teams. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 36–49
10.
Goetze, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press.
11.
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75–91
12.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Guralnick, M. (1994). Mothers' perceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of early childhood mainstreaming. Journal of Early Intervention, 18, 168–183
14.
Hamblin-Wilson, C., & Thurman, K. (1990). The transition from early intervention to kindergarten: Parental satisfaction and involvement. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 55–61
15.
Mahoney, G., O'Sullivan, P., Dennebaum, J. (1990). A national study of mothers' perceptions of family-focused early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 133–146
16.
McNaughton, D. (1994). Measuring parent satisfaction with early childhood intervention programs: Current practice, problems, and future perspectives. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 26–48
17.
McWilliam, R. A., Lang, L., Vandiviere, P., Angell, R., Collins, L., & Underdown, G. (1995). Satisfaction and struggles: Family perceptions of early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 43–60
18.
Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Murphy, D. L., Lee, I. M., Turnbull, A. P., & Turbiville, V. (1995). The family-centered program rating scale: An instrument for program evaluation and change. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 24–42
20.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
21.
Peck, C. A., Hayden, L., Wandschneider, M., Peterson, K., & Richarz, S. (1989). Development of integrated preschools: A qualitative inquiry into sources of resistance among parents, administrators, and teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 353–364
22.
Sallis, E. (1993). Total quality management in education. Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
23.
Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204
24.
Sontag, J. C., & Schacht, R. (1994). An ethnic comparison of parent participation and information needs in early intervention. Exceptional Children, 60, 422–433
25.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1984). Methodological considerations in qualitative research. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 296–303
26.
Stewart, D., & Shamdasani, P. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Summers, J. A., Dell'Oliver, C., Turnbull, A. P., Benson, H. A., Santelli, E., Campbell, M., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1990). Examining the individualized family service plan process: What are family and practitioner preferences?Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 78–99
28.
Warfield, M. R., & Hauser-Cram, P. (1996). Child care needs, arrangements, and satisfaction of mothers of children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 34, 294–302
29.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214
