In response to legislative mandates, the focus in early childhood special education has shifted from the child to the child in the context of the family. This shift has major implications for assessment as well as for intervention. In this article we describe an ecocultural approach for assessing families of young children with developmental problems. It is an approach that has grown out of empirical work and that we believe has clinical utility in designing interventions for young children and their families.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, D. B., & Simeonsson, R. J. (1988). Assessing needs of families with handicapped infants. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 117–129.
2.
Beckman, P. J., & Bristol, M. M. (1991). Issues in developing the IFSP: A framework for establishing family outcomes. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, 19–31.
3.
Beresford, B. A. (1994). Resources and strategies: How parents cope with the care of a disabled child. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 171–209.
4.
Bernheimer, L. P., Gallimore, R., & Kaufman, S. Z. (1993). Clinical child assessment in a family context: A four-group typology of family experiences with young children with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 253–269.
5.
Bernheimer, L. P., Gallimore, R., & Weisner, T. S. (1990). Ecocultural theory as a context for the Individual Family Service Plan. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 219–233.
6.
Bernheimer, L. P., & Keogh, B. K. (1982). Research on early abilities of children with handicaps. (Final report, longitudinal sample). Los Angeles: University of California.
7.
Bernheimer, L. P., & Keogh, B. K. (1988). The stability of cognitive performance of developmentally delayed children. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92, 539–542.
8.
Bernheimer, L. P., Keogh, B. K., & Coots, J. J. (1994). From research to practice: Support for developmental delay as a preschool category of exceptionality. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 97–106.
9.
Bristol, M. M. (1984). Family resources and successful adaptation to autistic children. In E. Schopler & G. Mesibov (Eds.), The effects of autism on the family (pp. 251–278). New York: Plenum.
10.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Journal of the American Psychological Association, 32, 513–529.
11.
Bruner, J. (1989, April). Culture and human development. Invited address to the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Kansas City, KS.
12.
Burden, M., & Thomas, D. (1986). A further perspective on parental reaction to handicap. The Exceptional Child, 33, 140–145.
13.
Crnic, K. A., Friedrich, W. N., & Greenberg, M. T. (1983). Adaptation of families with mentally retarded children: A model of stress, coping, and family ecology. American Journal on Mental Deficiency, 88, 125–138.
14.
D'Amato, E., & Yoshida, R. (1991). Parental needs: An educational life cycle perspective. Journal of Early Intervention, 11, 246–254.
15.
Dunst, C. J. (1985). Rethinking early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 165–201.
16.
Dunst, C. J. (1988). President's message. DEC Communicator, 15, 1.
17.
Dunst, C., Trivette, C, & Deal, A. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice.Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
18.
Dyson, L. (1993). Response to the presence of a child with disabilities: Parental stress and family functioning over time. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 207–218.
19.
Edgar, E. (1988). Policy factors influencing research in early childhood special education. In S. L. Odom & M. B. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps: An empirical base (pp. 51–62). Baltimore: Brookes.
20.
Fewell, R. F. (1986). The measurement of family functioning. In L. Bickman & D. L. Weatherford (Eds.), Evaluating early intervention programs for severely handicapped children and their families (pp. 263–310). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21.
Gabel, H., McDowell, J., & Cerreto, M. C. (1983). Family adaptation to the handicapped infant. In S. G. Garwood & R. R. Fewell (Eds.), Educating handicapped infants (pp. 455–493). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
22.
Gallimore, R., Goldenberg, C., & Weisner, T. S. (1994). The social construction and subjective reality of activity settings: Implications for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 537–559.
23.
Gallimore, R., Weisner, T. S., Bernheimer, L. P., Guthrie, D., & Nihira, K. (1993). Family responses to young children with developmental delays: Accommodation activity in ecological and cultural context. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 185–206.
24.
Gallimore, R., Weisner, T. S., Kaufman, S. Z., & Bernheimer, L. P. (1989). The social construction of ecocultural niches: Family accommodation of developmentally delayed children. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 216–230.
25.
Gallimore, R., Weisner, T. S., Nihira, K., Keogh, B. K., Bernheimer, L. P., & Mink, I. T. (1983). Ecocultural opportunity and family accommodation to developmentally delayed children. (Research proposal submitted to the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development). University of California, Los Angeles, Sociobehavioral Group, Mental Retardation Research Center.
26.
Glidden, L. M. (1993). What we do not know about families with children who have developmental disabilities: Questionnaires on resources and stress as a case study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 481–495.
27.
Goldenberg, C., Reese, L., & Gallimore, R. (1992). Context effects on the use of home literacy materials in Spanish-speaking children's homes. American Journal of Education, 100, 497–536.
28.
Guralnick, M. J. (1989). Recent developments in early intervention efficacy research: Implications for family involvement in P.L. 99–457. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 9(3), 1–17.
29.
Hanson, M. J., Lynch, E. W., & Wayman, K. I. (1990). Honoring the cultural diversity of families when gathering data. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(1), 112–131.
30.
Innocenti, M. S., Huh, K., & Boyce, G. C. (1992). Families of children with disabilities: Normative data and other considerations on parenting stress. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 403–427.
31.
Johnson, B. H., McGonigel, M. J., & Kaufmann, R. K. (1989). Guidelines and recommended practices for the individualized family service plan.Washington, DC: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System and Association for the Care of Children's Health.
32.
Knoll, J. (1992). Being a family: The experience of raising a child with a disability or chronic illness. In V. J. Bradley, J. Knoll, & J. M. Agosta (Eds.), Emerging issues in family support. (Monograph No. 18, pp. 9–56). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
33.
Krauss, M. W., & Jacobs, F. (1990). Family assessment: Purposes and techniques. In S. J. Meisels & J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 303–325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Longo, D. C., & Bond, L. L. (1984). Families of the handicapped child: Research and practice. Family Relations, 33, 57–65.
35.
Mahoney, G., O'Sullivan, P., & Robinson, C. (1992). The family environments of children with disabilities: Diverse but not so different. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 386–402.
36.
McBride, S. L., Brotherson, M. J., Joanning, H., Whiddon, D., & Demmitt, A. (1993). Implementation of family-centered services: Perceptions of families and professionals. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 414–430.
37.
McCubbin, H., & Patterson, J. (1983). Family stress adaptation to crises: A double ABCX model of family behavior. In H. McCubbin, M. Sussman, & J. Patterson (Eds.), Social stresses and the family: Advances and developments in family stress theory research (pp. 7–38). New York: Haworth Press.
38.
McGonigel, M. J., & Garland, C. W. (1988). The individualized family service plan and the early intervention team: Team and family issues and recommended practices. Infants and Young Children, 1, 10–21.
39.
McWilliam, R. A., Lang, L., Vandiviere, P., Angell, R., Collins, L., & Underdown, G. (1995). Satisfaction and struggles: Family perceptions of early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 43–60.
40.
Meyer, E. C., & Bailey, D. B. (1993). Family-centered care in early intervention: Community and hospital settings. In J. L. Paul & R. J. Simeonsson (Eds.), Children with special needs: Family, culture, and society (2nd ed., pp. 181–209). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
41.
Nihira, K. (in press). Japanese-American families of children with developmental delay: Child rearing practices and family relationships. In I. T. Mink, M. L. Siantz, & P. W. Berman (Eds.), American Journal on Mental Retardation Monograph Series.
42.
Roberts, R. N., & Magrab, P. R. (1991). Psychologists' role in a family-centered approach to practice, training, and research with young children. American Psychologist, 46, 144–148.
43.
Seligman, M., & Darling, R. (1989). Ordinary families, special children.New York: Guilford.
44.
Shonkoff, J. P., Hauser-Cram, P., Krauss, M. W., & Upshur, C. C. (1992). Development of infants with disabilities and their families. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Suelze, M., & Keenan, V. (1981). Changes in family support networks over the life cycle of mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 267–274.
46.
Summers, J. A., Dell'Oliver, C., Turnbull, A. P., Benson, H. A., Santelli, E., Campbell, M., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1990). Examining the Individualized Family Service Plan process: What are family and practitioner preferences?Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(1), 78–99.
47.
Trivette, C. M., Deal, A., & Dunst, C. J. (1986). Family needs, sources of support, and professional roles: Critical elements of family systems assessment and intervention. Diagnostique, 11, 246–267.
48.
Turnbull, A. P., Summers, J. A., & Brotherson, M. J. (1986). Family life cycle: Theoretical and empirical implications and future directions for families with mentally retarded members. In J. J. Gallagher & P. V. Vietze (Eds.), Families of handicapped persons (pp. 45–66). Baltimore: Brookes.
49.
Weisner, T. S. (1984). Ecocultural niches of middle childhood: A cross-cultural perspective. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Development during middle childhood: The years from six to twelve (pp. 335–369). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
50.
West, E. (1993). Stegner, story-telling, and western identity. Paper presented at the Symposium in Tribute to Wallace Stegner, Missoula Montana, September 17, 1993.
51.
Wikkler, L. (1986). Family stress theory and research on families of children with mental retardation. In J. J. Gallagher & P. M. Vietze (Eds.), Families of handicapped persons: Research, programs, and policy issues (pp. 167–196). Baltimore: Brookes.
52.
Winton, P. J. (1988). The family-focused interview: An assessment measure and goal setting mechanism. In D. B. Bailey & R. J. Simeonsson (Eds.), Family assessment in early intervention (pp. 185–206). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
