This paper addresses several major ethical issues faced by home visitors in their helping relationships with clients: maintaining a client focus, client independence, honesty, confidentiality, limits of intervention, and termination. Examples of home visiting dilemmas from two early intervention programs are used in the discussion of these concerns. A framework for evaluating ethical dilemmas is summarized, and a professional code of ethics is recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (1981). Ethical principles of psychologists. American Psychologist, 36, 633--638.
Dorn, F.J., (1986). The social influence model: An overview. In F.J. Dorn (Ed.), The social influence process in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 3--15). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
4.
Gray, S.W., & Wandersman, L.P., (1980). The methodology of home-based intervention studies: Problems and promising strategies. Child Development, 51, 993--1009.
5.
Hollis, F., & Wood, M.E., (1981). Casework: A psychosocial therapy (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
6.
Infant Health and Development Program. (1990). Enhancing the outcomes of low birth weight, premature infants: A multisite randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 3035--3042.
7.
Levenstein, P.D. (1981). Ethical considerations in home-based programs. In M. Bryce & J.C. Lloyd (Eds.), Treating families in the home: An alternative to placement (pp. 222--236). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
8.
National Association of Social Workers. (1980). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social WorkersSilver Spring, MD: Author.
9.
Pederson, P.P., (1981). The cultural inclusiveness of counseling. In P.P. Pedersen, J.G. Draguns, W.J. Lonner, & J.E. Trimble (Eds.), Counseling across cultures (pp. 22--58). Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.
10.
Ramey, C.T., Bryant, D.Sparling, J.J. & Wasik, B.H., (1984). A biosocial systems perspective on environmental interventions for low birthweight infants. Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 27, 672--692.
11.
Ramey, C.T., Bryant, D.M.Sparling, J.J. & Wasik, B.H., (1985). Project CARE: A comparison of two early intervention strategies to prevent retarded development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5,(2), 12--25.
12.
Ramey, C.T., Bryant, D.M. Wasik, B.H. Sparling, J.J. Fendt, K.H. & LaVange, L.M., (1990). The Infant Health and Development Program for low birthweight, premature infants: Program elements, family participation, and child intelligence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13.
Reamer, F.G., (1990). Ethical dilemmas in social serviceNew York: Columbia University Press.
14.
Skinner, B.F., (1978). The ethics of helping people. In L. Wispe (Ed.), Altruism, sympathy, and helping. New York: Academic Press.
15.
Wasik, B.H., Bryant, D. & Lyons, C. (1990). Home visiting: Procedures for helping familiesNewbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Wasik, B.H., Ramey, C.T. Bryant, D.M. & Sparling, J.J., (in press). A longitudinal study of two early intervention strategies: Project CARE. Child Development.
17.
Wasik, B.H., & Roberts, R.N., (1989). Home visiting with low income families. Family Resource Coalition Report, 9, 8--9.
