This article describes a variety of conceptual and methodological limitations of existing research on the efficacy of early intervention programs. Problems related to the specification of both independent and dependent variables are noted, and recent studies using meta-analytic techniques to generate testable hypotheses are reviewed. Recommendations for greater precision in measurement and for improved research design are presented. Finally, some reasons for the persistence of common problems in program evaluation are offered in conjunction with suggestions for future research efforts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bromwich, R. (1981). Working with parents and infants—An interactional approach. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
2.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). Is early intervention effective. (Publication No. OHD 74–24). Washington, DC: DHEW, Office of Child Development.
3.
Brooks-Gunn, J., & Lewis, M. (1981). Assessing young handicapped children: Issues and solutions. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 2, 84–95.
4.
Casto, G., & Mastropieri, M. (1986). The efficacy of early intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 5, 417–424.
5.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
6.
Dunst, C. (1985). Rethinking early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 165–201.
7.
Dunst, C., & Rheingrover, R. (1981). An analysis of the efficacy of infant intervention programs with organically handicapped children. Evaluation and Program Planning, 4, 287–323.
8.
Garwood, S.G. (1982). (Mis)use of developmental scales in program evaluation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1, 61–69.
9.
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis of social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
House, E.R., Glass, G.V., McLean, L.D., & Walker, D.F. (1978). No simple answer: Critique of the Follow Through evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 128–160.
11.
Johnson, N.M. (1982). Assessment paradigms and atypical infants: An interventionist's perspective. In D. Bricker (Ed.), Application of research findings to intervention with at-risk and handicapped infants. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
12.
Lazar, I., & Darlington, R. (Eds). (1982). Lasting effects of early education: A report from the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47(2–3, Serial No. 195).
13.
Light, R.J., & Pillemer, D.B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Meisels, S. (1985). The efficacy of early intervention: Why are we still asking this question?. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5, 1–11.
15.
Ramey, C., & Bryant, D. (1983). Enhancing the development of socially disadvantaged children with programs of varying intensities. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.
16.
Sameroff, A., & Chandler, M. (1975). Reproductive risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In F.D. Horowitz (Ed.), Review of child development research, volume four. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Shonkoff, J. (1983). The limitations of normative assessments of high-risk infants. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3, 29–43.
18.
Shonkoff, J., & Hauser-Cram, P. (1967). Early intervention for disabled infants and their families–A quantitative analysis. Pediatrics, 80.
19.
Simeonsson, R., Cooper, D., & Scheiner, A. (1982). A review and analysis of the effectiveness of early intervention programs. Pediatrics, 69, 635–641.
20.
Tallmadge, G. (1977). Ideabook: The Joint Dissemination Review Panel. Washington, DC: USDOE.
21.
Turnbull, H.R. (1976). Report of the parents' committee: Families in crisis, families at risk. In T.D. Tjossem (Ed.), Intervention strategies for high risk infants and young children. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
22.
White, K., & Casto, G. (1985). An integrative review of early intervention efficacy studies with at-risk children: Implications for the handicapped. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 7–31.
23.
White, K., Mastropieri, M., & Casto, G. (1984). An analysis of special education early childhood projects approved by the Joint Dissemination Review Panel. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 9, 11–26.
24.
Zelazo, P. (1979). Reactivity to perceptual-cognitive events: Application for infant assessment. In R.B. Kearsley & I.E. Sigel (Eds.), Infants at risk: Assessment of cognitive functioning. (pp. 49–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
