Infants and toddlers with complex medical needs are likely to receive early intervention (EI) services, which take place in children’s natural environments (NEs). Little is known about the NE of children with complex medical needs or how their EI services are implemented in consideration of their intersectional identities. In this case study, we explored the NE of one child with complex medical needs who was experiencing homelessness and how his EI services were embedded in his NE. We used multiple qualitative methods, including observations, interviews, document review, auto-photography, and photo-elicitation. Using thematic analysis, we developed five themes from the data: (a) description of the child’s NE, (b) the family’s planning and intentionality, (c) positivity and acceptance, (d) family expertise versus provider expertise, and (e) a continuum of practices. Implications relate to practices that align with a family’s unique circumstances and the need for research that addresses a family’s intersectional experiences navigating disability.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
2.
BayerN. D.WangH.YuJ. A.KuoD. Z.HaltermanJ. S.YueL. (2021). A national mental health profile of parents of children with medical complexity. Pediatrics, 148(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-023358
3.
BedellG.CosterW.LawM.LiljenquistK.KaoY.TeplickyR.AnabyD.KhetaniM. A. (2013). Community participation, supports and barriers of school-age children with and without disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(2), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.024
4.
BlanchardS. B.NewtonJ. R.DidericksenK. W.DanielsM.GlossonK. (2021). Confronting racism and bias within early intervention: The responsibility of systems and individuals to influence change and advance equity. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121421992470
5.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
BrownS. M.BenderK.OrsiR.McCraeJ. S.PhillipsJ. D.RienksS. (2019). Adverse childhood experiences and their relationship to complex health profiles among child welfare-involved children: A classification and regression tree analysis. Health Services Research, 54(4), 902–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13166
9.
CiupeA.SalisburyC. (2020). Examining caregivers’ independence in early intervention home visit sessions. Journal of Early Intervention, 42(4), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815120902727
DeckerK. D.MeldrumJ.VaterlausJ. M.FosterT. D. (2021). Parents’ Part C experiences in rural areas: Alignment with recommended practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 43(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815120953484
DunstC. J.HambyD.TrivetteC. M.RaabM.BruderM. B. (2000). Everyday family and community life and children’s naturally occurring learning opportunities. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(3), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151000230030501
14.
FlemingJ.SawyerL. B. E.CampbellP. H. (2011). Early intervention providers’ perceptions about providing participation-based services. Topics in Early Childhood, 30(4), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121410371986
15.
GrantR. (1991). The special needs of homeless children: Early intervention at a welfare hotel. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(4), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112149101000407
16.
HurleyJ. J.LoobyW.GoodrumA. R.CampbellE. M.BontiG. K.RaymonB. A.CondonR.SchwaeberS. E.MauceriM. E.BourneE. M.CallahanE. D.HardyD. L.MathewsP. (2018). Early intervention for families and children experiencing homelessness. Infants and Young Children, 31(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000107
17.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.SinclairJ.PoppenM.WoodsW. E.ShearerM. L. (2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development & Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415588047
20.
McWilliamR. A. (2010). Routines-based early intervention: Supporting young children and their families. Brookes.
21.
NwokahE.HsuH. C.GulkerH. (2013). The use of play materials in early intervention: The dilemma of poverty. American Journal of Play, 5(2), 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0013)
22.
QR Collective. (2023). Reflexive quality criteria: Questions and indicators for purpose-driven special education qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231168106
23.
ShawD. (2013). A new look at an old research method: Photo-elicitation. TESOL Journal, 4, 785–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.108
24.
SpenceC. M.Rooks-EllisD. L.RuizA. B.FishL. A.JonesB.O’GradyC. E.SulinskiE. (2022). The language we use: Providers’ perceptions about families. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50, 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01258-2
25.
SpenceC. M.Rooks-EllisD. L.RuizA. B.FishL. A.Jones-BanahanB.O’GradyC. E.SulinskiE. (2023). How early interventionists support families experiencing vulnerable circumstances: A closer look at family-centered practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 144, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106752
26.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE.
27.
StewartS. L.ApplequistK. (2019). Diverse families in early intervention: Professionals’ views of coaching. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 33(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1577777
28.
ThomasM. E. (2009). Auto-photography. In KitchinR.ThriftN. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 244–251). Elsevier.
29.
WilliamsC. S.OstroskyM. M. (2019). What about MY TOYS? Common questions about using a bagless approach in early intervention. Young Exceptional Children, 23(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250619829739
30.
WilliamsC. S.SawyerG. E.AlexanderJ. R.OstroskyM. M. (2023). Inclusion of infants and toddlers with significant support needs across natural environments: What can early interventionists do?Inclusive Practices, 2(2–3), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/27324745231171663
31.
WilliamsC. S.SawyerG. E.OstroskyM. M. (2024). A close look at intersectionality in an early intervention case study. [Manuscript submitted for publication].
32.
WindsorK. S.WoodsJ.KaiserA. P.SnyderP.SalisburyC. (2019). Caregiver-implemented intervention for communication and motor outcomes for infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121418815250
YinR. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
