Early Interventionists’ Caregiver Coaching: A Mixed Methods Approach Exploring Experiences and Practices

Abstract

Early intervention (EI) for infants and toddlers with disabilities relies on family-centered practices. Caregiver coaching, one family-centered practice used in EI, can lead to improved supports by caregivers and improved outcomes for children with disabilities. However, within the research literature, little is understood about the experiences, practices, and barriers EI providers face when coaching caregivers. To understand these issues, a mixed method design was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data using questionnaires, EI provider interviews, and coaching logs from EI providers. Results from all three data collection sources for 19 early interventionists provide insight into the perceptions, experiences, benefits, and barriers of caregiver coaching as shared by EI providers in one state. Implications for practice, future research directions, and limitations are discussed.

Keywords

caregiver–child interaction developmental delay involvement of families family-centered home visiting personnel preparation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akamoglu

Meadan

Pearson

J. N.

Cummings

(2018). Getting connected: Speech and language pathologists’ perceptions of building rapport via telepractice. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 30, 569–585.

Bryman

(2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6, 97–113.

Carta

J. J.

Lefever

J. B.

Bigelow

Borkowski

Warren

S. F.

(2013). Randomized trial of a cellular phone-enhanced home visitation parenting intervention. Pediatrics, 132(Suppl. 2), S167–S173.

Cook

B. G.

Cook

S. C.

(2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. Journal of Special Education, 47, 71–82.

Corr

Snodgrass

M. R.

Greene

Meadan

Santos

R. M.

(in press). Mixed methods in early childhood special education research: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Early Intervention.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices

Dobransky

N. D.

Frymier

A. B.

(2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 211–223.

Dunst

C. J.

Trivette

C. M.

Deal

A. G.

(2011). Effects of in-service training on early intervention practitioners’ use of family systems intervention practices in the USA. Professional Development in Education, 37, 181–196.

10.

Epley

P. H.

Summers

J. A.

Turnbull

A. P.

(2011). Family outcomes of early intervention: Families’ perceptions of need, services, and outcomes. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 201–219.

11.

Flaherty

(1999). Coaching: Evoking excellence in others. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

12.

Friedman

Woods

Salisbury

(2012). Caregiver coaching strategies for early intervention providers: Moving toward operational definitions. Infants & Young Children, 25, 62–82.

13.

Greene

J. C.

(2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.

14.

Greenwood

C. R.

Abbott

(2001). The research to practice in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 276–289.

15.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C § 1400 (2004).

16.

Ingersoll

Dvortcsak

(2006). Including parent training in the early childhood special education curriculum for children with ASD spectrum disorders. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 79–87.

17.

Johnson

R. B.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

(2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.

18.

Joyce

B. R.

Showers

(2002). Student achievement through staff development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

19.

Kemp

Turnbull

A. P.

(2014). Coaching with parents in early intervention: An interdisciplinary research synthesis. Infants & Young Children, 27, 305–324.

20.

Mahoney

MacDonald

(2005). Responsive teaching: Parent-mediated developmental intervention. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.

21.

Meadan

Angell

M. E.

Stoner

J. B.

Daczewitz

(2014). Parent-implemented social-pragmatic communication intervention: A pilot study. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29, 95–110.

22.

Meadan

Douglas

S. N.

Kammes

Schraml-Block

(2018). “I’m a different coach with every family”: Early interventionists’ beliefs and practices. Infants & Young Children, 31(3), 200–214.

23.

Meadan

Snodgrass

M. R.

Meyer

L. E.

Fisher

K. W.

Chung

M. Y.

Halle

J. W.

(2016). Internet-based parent-implemented intervention for young children with autism: A pilot study. Journal of Early Intervention, 38, 3–23.

24.

Meadan

Snodgrass

M. R.

Palomo

Amenta

C. G.

Halle

J. W.

(2016). A framework for defining contexts for training and coaching practices. Exceptionality, 25, 253–269.

25.

National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies. (2011). Early childhood education professional development: Training and technical assistance glossary. Author. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/GlossaryTraining_TA.pdf

26.

Peterson

C. A.

Luze

G. J.

Eshbaugh

E. M.

Jeon

H. J.

Kantz

K. R.

(2007). Enhancing parent-child interactions through home visiting: Promising practice or unfulfilled promise? Journal of Early Intervention, 29, 119–140.

27.

Rush

Shelden

Hanft

(2003). Coaching families and colleagues: A process for collaboration in natural settings. Infants & Young Children, 16, 33–47.

28.

Rush

D. D.

Shelden

M. L. L.

(2011). The Early Childhood Coaching Handbook. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

29.

Salisbury

Cambray-Engstrom

Woods

(2012). Providers’ reported and actual use of coaching strategies in natural environments. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32, 88–98.

30.

Salisbury

C. L.

Woods

Copeland

(2010). Provider perspectives on adopting and using collaborative consultation in natural environments. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30, 132–147.

31.

Salisbury

Woods

Snyder

Moddelmog

Mawdsley

Romano

Windsor

(2018). Caregiver and provider experiences with coaching and embedded intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 38, 17–29.

32.

Sawyer

B. E.

Campbell

P. H.

(2012). Early interventionists’ perspectives on teaching caregivers. Journal of Early Intervention, 34, 104–124.

33.

Trivette

C. M.

Dunst

C. J.

Hamby

D. W.

O’Herin

C. E.

(2009). Characteristics and consequences of adult learning methods and strategies. Winterberry research syntheses, 2(2), 1–33.

34.

Yell

(2016). The law and special education. Boston, MD: Pearson Education.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB