This review was designed to characterize current intervention research for increasing imitation for young children with disabilities. We identified 34 unique sources including assessments of different types of massed trial and embedded trial interventions. Across intervention types, when evaluated via the Single Case Analysis and Review Framework (SCARF), positive outcomes were more likely to occur when dependent variables were primary (i.e., not secondary to another dependent variable) and context-bound (i.e., collected during intervention sessions). When only primary variables from high-quality studies were considered, embedded trials more often resulted in functional relationships. Recommendations for practice include using cues, prompts, and rewards for imitation; teaching imitation to toddlers; attending to imitation function; and teaching imitation in varied contexts.
BrickerD.DionneC.GrishamJ.JohnsonJ. J.MacyM.SlentzK. L.WaddellM. (2021). Assessment, evaluation, and programming system for infants and young children (3rd ed.) (AEPS®-3). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
2.
BrownA. K.BrownJ. L.PoulsonC. L. (2008). Discriminating which fork to use: Teaching selective imitation to people with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2(2), 199–208.
3.
ChazinK. T.LedfordJ. R.PakN. S. (2021). A Systematic Review of Augmented Input Interventions and Exploratory Analysis of Moderators. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1–14.
4.
DeshaisM. A.PhillipsC. L.WiskowK. M.VollmerT. R.DonaldsonJ. M. (2020). A comparison of imitation training using concurrent versus delayed prompting. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(3), 132–147.
5.
DixonM. R.BelisleJ.WhitingS. W.RowseyK. E. (2014). Normative sample of the PEAK relational training system: Direct training module and subsequent comparisons to individuals with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(11), 1597–1606.
6.
EckermanC. O.DavisC. C.DidowS. M. (1989). Toddlers’ emerging ways of achieving social coordinations with a peer. Child Development, 60(2), 440–453.
7.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Research approaches in applied settings. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology. Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–26). Routledge.
8.
GrusecJ. E.AbramovitchR. (1982). Imitation of peers and adults in a natural setting: A functional analysis. Child Development, 53(3), 636–642.
9.
HamptonL. H.KaiserA. P.NietfeldJ. P.KhachoyanA. (2020). Generalized effects of naturalistic social communication intervention for minimally verbal children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(1), 1–13.
10.
IngersollB. (2008). The social role of imitation in autism. Implications for the treatment of imitation deficits. Infants & Young Children, 21(2), 107–119.
11.
IngersollB.GergansS. (2007). The effect of a parent-implemented imitation intervention on spontaneous imitation skills in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 163–175.
12.
LedfordJ. R.ChazinK. T.GagnonK.LordA.TurnerV. R.ZimmermanK. N. (2020). A systematic review of instructional comparisons in single case research. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519855059
13.
LedfordJ. R.ChazinK. T.LaneJ. D.ZimmermanK. N.AyresK. A. (2020, August). Single case analysis and review framework (SCARF). https://ebip.vkcsites.org/scarfv2/
14.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology. Routledge.
15.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.BartonE. E. (2019). Instructional methods for early childhood classrooms. Routledge.
16.
LedfordJ. R.WoleryM. (2011). Teaching imitation to young children with disabilities: A review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30(4), 245–255.
17.
LimM. N. (2016). Peak relational training-direct training module: Vocal imitation acquisition between developmental sounds and random sounds [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global Database. (UMI No. 10163490).
18.
MasurE. F. (2006). Vocal and action imitation by infants and toddlers during dyadic interactions. In RogersS. J.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Imitation and the social mind (pp. 27–47). Guilford Press.
19.
MasurE. F.EichorstD. L. (2002). Infants' spontaneous imitation of novel versus familiar words: Relations to observational and maternal report measures of their lexicons. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48(4), 405–426.
20.
McDuffieA.TurnerL.StoneW.YoderP.WoleryM.UlmanT. (2007). Developmental correlates of different types of motor imitation in young children with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(3), 401–412.
21.
McDuffieA.YoderP.StoneW. (2005). Prelinguistic predictors of vocabulary in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1080–1097.
22.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS MED, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
23.
O’ConnorD.GreenS.HigginsJ. (2008). Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In HigginsJ. P. T.GreenS. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0 (pp. 83–94). The Cochrane Collaboration.
24.
O’NeillM. B.Suzanne ZeedykM. (2006). Spontaneous imitation in the social interactions of young people with developmental delay and their adult carers. Infant and Child Development, 15(3), 283–295.
25.
RogersS. J.DawsonG. (2010). Early Start Denver Model for young children with autism: Promoting language, learning, and engagement. Guilford.
26.
RogersS. J.HepburnS. L.StackhouseT.WehnerE. (2003). Imitation performance in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(5), 763–781.
27.
RogersS. J.WilliamsJ. H. (Eds.). (2006). Imitation and the social mind. Guilford Press.
28.
RosekransM. (1967). Imitation in children as a function of perceived similarity to a social model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(3), 307–315.
29.
ShadishW. R.ZelinskyN. A.VeveaJ. L.KratowchillT. R. (2016). A survey of publication practices of single-case design researchers when treatments have small or large effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(3), 656–673.
30.
SternD. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. Basic Books.
31.
StoneW. L.OusleyO. Y.LittlefordC. D. (1997). Motor imitation in young children with autism: What’s the object?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25(6), 475–485.
32.
StrainP. S.BoveyE. H. (2011). Randomized, controlled trial of the LEAP model of early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(3), 133–154.
33.
TincaniM.TraversJ. (2018). Publishing single-case research design studies that do not demonstrate experimental control. Remedial and Special Education, 39(2), 118–128.
34.
UzgirisI. C. (1981). Two functions of imitation during infancy. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4(1), 1–12.
35.
ValentinoA. L.LeBlancL. A.CondeK. A. (2018). Validation of a skills assessment to match interventions to teach motor imitation to children with autism. Learning and Motivation, 62, 67–76.
36.
VivantiG.HamiltonA. (2014). Imitation in autism spectrum disorders. In VolkmarF. R.PaulR.RogersS. J.PelphreyK. A. (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (4th ed., pp. 278–301). Wiley.
WhitenA.BrownJ. (1998). Imitation and the reading of other minds: Perspectives from human and non-human primates. In BratenS. (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 260–280). Cambridge University Press.
39.
YoderP. J.LloydB. P.SymonsF. J. (2018). Observational measurement of behavior. Paul H. Brookes.
40.
ZimmermanK. N.LedfordJ. R. (2017). Beyond ASD: Evidence for the effectiveness of social narratives. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(3), 199–217.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
