Withdrawal and multitreatment single subject research designs were used to evaluate the effectiveness of stay-play-talk (SPT) interventions on social behaviors of preschool-aged peers to children with disabilities. Each group included at least one socially competent peer and one child with Down syndrome who used an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device as a primary mode of communication. Peers were trained to use SPT strategies during free play sessions, and a modified reinforcement system and modified peer arrangement were introduced for one group. For one group, results indicate a functional relation between the original SPT intervention and increased stay and play behaviors. For the other group, results indicate a functional relation between SPT with modified arrangement and increased stay and play behaviors. Future research is needed to determine effectiveness of SPT interventions for children with disabilities who have more sophisticated functional play skills, as well as utility of creating peer dyads compared with peer triads.
BarberA. B.SaffoR. W.GilpinA. T.CraftL. D.GoldsteinH. (2016). Peers as clinicians: Examining the impact of stay play talk on social communication in young preschoolers with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 59, 1–15.
2.
BockS. J.StonerJ. B.BeckA. R.HanleyL.ProchnowJ. (2005). Increasing functional communication in non-speaking preschool children: Comparison of PECS and VOCA. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 264–278.
3.
ClarkeM.KirtonA. (2003). Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 135–151.
4.
CosbeyJ. E.JohnstonS. (2006). Using a single-switch voice output communication aid to increase social access for children with severe disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 144–156.
5.
EnglishK.GoldsteinH.KaczmarekL.ShaferK. (1997). Promoting interactions among preschoolers with and without disabilities: Effects of a buddy skills-training program. Exceptional Children, 63, 229–243.
6.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
GoldsteinH.EnglishK.ShaferK.KaczmarekL. (1997). Interaction among preschoolers with and without disabilities: Effects of across-the-day peer intervention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 33–48.
8.
GoldsteinH.KaczmarekL.PenningtonR.ShaferK. (1992). Peer-mediated intervention: Attending to, commenting on, and acknowledging the behavior of preschoolers with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 289–305.
9.
GuralnickM. J.ConnorR. T.HammondM.GottmanJ.KinnishK. (1996). Immediate effects of mainstreamed settings on the social interactions and social integration of preschool children. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 359–377.
10.
GuralnickM. J.HammondM. A.ConnorR. T.NevilleB. (2006). Stability, change, and correlates of the peer relationships of young children with mild developmental delays. Child Development, 77, 312–324.
11.
HonigA. S.McCarronP. A. (1988). Prosocial behaviors of handicapped and typical peers in an integrated preschool. Early Child Development and Care, 33, 113–125.
12.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
13.
HughettK.KohlerF. W.RaschkeD. (2013). The effects of a buddy skills package on preschool children’s social interactions and play. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32, 246–254.
14.
JosephJ. D.StrainP.OlszewskiA.GoldsteinH. (2016). A consumer reports-like review of the empirical literature specific to preschool children’s peer-related social skills. In ReichowB.BoydB.BartonE.OdomS. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 179–197). London, England: Springer.
15.
KohlerF. W.GretemanC.RaschkeD.HighnamC. (2007). Using a buddy skills package to increase the social interactions between a preschooler with autism and her peers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 155–163.
16.
OdomS. L.BuysseV.SoukakouE. (2011). Inclusion for young children with disabilities: A quarter century of research perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 344–356.
17.
PartenM. B. (1932). Social participation among pre-school children. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27, 243–269.
18.
RobertsonJ.GreenK.AlperS.SchlossP. J.KohlerF. (2003). Using a peer-mediated intervention to facilitate children’s participation in inclusive childcare activities. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 182–197.
19.
StrainP. S.BoveyE. H. (2011). Randomized, controlled trial of the leap model of early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 133–154.
TherrienM. C.LightJ.PopeL. (2016). Systematic review of the effects of interventions to promote peer interactions for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 81–93.
22.
Thiemann-BourqueK.BradyN.McGuffS.StumpK.NaylorA. (2016). Picture exchange communication system and pals: A peer-mediated augmentative and alternative communication intervention for minimally verbal preschoolers with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 1133–1145.
23.
TrembathD.BalandinS.TogherL.StancliffeR. J. (2009). Peer-mediated teaching and augmentative and alternative communication for preschool-aged children with autism. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34, 173–186.
24.
WoleryM.HemmeterM. L. (2011). Classroom instruction: Background, assumptions, and challenges. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 371–380.
