Hearing Their Voices: Parents’ Perceptions of Preschool Special Education Evaluations With Dual-Language Learners

Abstract

Advancing equity in early childhood education is crucial as our broader society faces issues of inequities across systems, including education. Professionals must honor children’s home language and cultural contexts, coming from a perspective of value and respect rather than from a traditionally dominant Eurocentric perspective. Through this study, we share the perspectives of 22 U.S. parents of dual-language learners (DLLs) as they experienced an evaluation for preschool special education. Through a mixed-methods approach using survey and interview data, three primary themes emerged: (a) relationships and interactions, (b) home language and cultural context, and (c) the evaluation process. Significant differences in satisfaction emerged between those who had participated in Part C Early Intervention services versus those who had not.

Keywords

cultural issues assessment family/parent involvement cultural diversity personnel preparation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott-Smith

Morawska-Patera

Łuniewska

Spruce

Haman

(2018). Using parenting questionnaires to investigate heritage language proficiency of bilingual children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 34(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659018780958

Acar

Blasco

P. M.

(2018). Guidelines for collaborating with interpreters in early intervention/early childhood special education. Young Exceptional Children, 21(3), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250616674516

Bagnato

S. J.

Goins

D. D.

Pretti-Frontczak

Neisworth

J. T.

(2014). Authentic “assessment” as best practice for early childhood intervention: National consumer social validity research. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121414523652

Banerjee

Guiberson

(2012). Evaluating young children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds for special education services. Young Exceptional Children, 15(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250611445368

Barerra

Kramer

(2012). Relationships and paradigm shifts: Exploring dispositions to engender loving, joyful and compassionate partnerships with families. In Santos

R. M.

Cheatham

G. A.

Durán

L. K.

(Eds.), Supporting young children who are dual language learners with or at-risk for disabilities, Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series 14 (pp. 61–74). Division for Early Childhood.

Bruns

D. A.

LaRocco

D. J.

(2019). Supporting parents’ confidence to pull up a chair at the early intervention/early childhood special education table. Young Exceptional Children, 22(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250617725514

Cascio

A. M.

Lee

Vaudin

Freedman

D. A.

(2019). A team-based approach to open coding: Considerations for creating intercoder consensus. Field Methods, 31(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19838237

Cheatman

G. A.

Durán

L. K.

Hong

J. Y.

(2012). Voices from the field: Families of dual language learners. In Santos

R. M.

Cheatham

G. A.

Durán

L. K.

(Eds.), Supporting young children who are dual language learners with or at-risk for disabilities, Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series 14 (pp. 51–60). Division for Early Childhood.

Cheatham

G. A.

Lim-Mullins

(2018). Immigrant, bilingual parents of students with disabilities: Positive perceptions and supportive dialogue. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.11771053451218762490

10.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.

11.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

Gutmann

Hanson

(2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Tashakkori

Teddlie

(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). SAGE.

12.

Cycyk

L. M.

Durán

(2020). Supporting young children with disabilities and their families from undocumented immigrant backgrounds: Recommendations for program leaders and practitioners. Young Exceptional Children, 23(4), 212–224.

13.

De Gioia

(2013). Cultural negotiation: Moving beyond a cycle of misunderstanding in early childhood settings. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 11(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X12466202

14.

de Sam Lazaro

S. L.

(2017). The importance of authentic assessment in eligibility determination for infants and toddlers. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116689061

15.

Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC Recommended Practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. https://www.dec-sped.org/dec-recommended-practices

16.

Dunst

Dempsey

I. J.

(2007). Family-professional partnerships and parenting competence, confidence, and enjoyment. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 53(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120701488772

17.

Espinosa

L. M.

García

(2012). Developmental assessment of young dual language learners with a focus on Kindergarten entry assessment: Implications for state policies (Working Paper #1). Center for Early Care and Education Research-Dual Language Learners, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

18.

Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015–2016).

19.

Farnsworth

(2018). Differentiating second language acquisition from specific learning disability: An observational tool assessing dual language learners’ pragmatic competence. Young Exceptional Children, 21(2), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250615621356

20.

Gay

(2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

21.

Glesne

(2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

22.

González

Moll

Amanti

(2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practice in households, communities, and classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum.

23.

Guba

E. G.

Lincoln

(2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions & emerging confluences. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191–215). SAGE.

24.

Halgunseth

(2009). Family engagement, diverse families, and early childhood education programs: An integrated review of the literature. Young Children, 64(5), 56–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42730486

25.

Hatmaker

Pinzon-Perez

Khang

Cha

(2010). Commentary: The Hmong and their perceptions about physical disabilities: An overview and review of selected literature. Hmong Studies Journal, 11, 1–16.

26.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (2004).

27.

Katan

(2014). Translating cultures: An introduction for translators, interpreters, and mediators. Taylor & Francis.

28.

Lincoln

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

29.

Lynch

W. W.

Hansen

M. J.

(Eds.). (2011). Developing cross-cultural competence: Working with young children and their families (4th ed.). Paul H. Brookes.

30.

Shen

Krenn

H. Y.

Yuan

(2017). A meta-analysis of the relationship between learning outcomes and parental involvement during early childhood education and early elementary education. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 771–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9351-1

31.

McLean

Banerjee

Squires

Hebbler

(2020). Assessment: Introduction and overview. In McLean

Banerjee

Squires

Hebbler

(Eds.), Assessment: Recommended practices for young children and families (DEC Recommended Practices Monograph Series No. 7) (pp. iv–xi). Division for Early Childhood.

32.

McWilliams

R. A.

(2010). Working with families of young children with special needs. Guilford Press.

33.

Morgan

P. L.

Farkas

Cook

Strasseld

N. M.

Hillemeier

M. M.

Pun

W. H.

Wang

Schussler

D. L.

(2018). Are Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or language-minority children overrepresented in special education? Exceptional Children, 84(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917748303

34.

National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2019). Advancing equity in early childhood education. https://www.naeyc.org/resources/position-statements/equity

35.

Peña

E. D.

Halle

T. G.

(2011). Assessing preschool dual language learners: Traveling a multiforked road. Child Development Perspectives, 5(1), 28–32.

36.

Ramírez

Cycyk

L. M.

Scarpino

S. E.

Lòpez

L. M.

Hammer

C. S.

(2020). Teacher beliefs and misconceptions regarding dual language learners in Head Start: An opportunity for enhancing professional development. NHSA Dialog, 23(1), 48–52.

37.

Ratemo

S. K.

(2016). Immigrant parent perceptions of disability and special education services. http://repository.stcloudstate.edu/sped_etds/8

38.

Reschly

A. L.

Christenson

S. L.

(2012). Moving from “context matters” to engaged partnerships with families. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 22(1), 62–78. http://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2011.649650

39.

Saldana

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative research. SAGE.

40.

Smith

T. E.

Sheridan

S. M.

(2018). The effects of teacher training on teachers’ family- engagement practices, attitudes, and knowledge: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 29(2), 128–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2018.1460725

41.

Strauss

Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE.

42.

Trivette

C. M.

Banerjee

(2015). Using the recommended practices to build parent competence and confidence. In Division for Early Childhood (Ed.), Monograph series 1. DEC recommended practices: Enhancing services for young children with disabilities and their families (pp. 65–76). Division for Early Childhood.

43.

Umansky

I. M.

Thompson

K. D.

Diaz

(2017). Using an ever-English learner framework to examine disproportionality in special education. Exceptional Children, 84(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917707470

44.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services & U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Policy statement on supporting the development of children who are dual language learners in early childhood programs. https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/dll-policy-statement-final.pdf

45.

Vining

Long

Inglebret

Brendal

(2017). Speech-language assessment considerations for American Indian and Alaska Native children who are dual language learners. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 14(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp2.SIG14.29

46.

Wackerle-Hollman

Durán

(2020). Screening and progress monitoring language and early literacy skills in Spanish-speaking dual language learners with disabilities. In McLean

Banerjee

Squires

Hebbler

(Eds.), Assessment: Recommended practices for young children and families (DEC Recommended Practices Monograph Series No. 7) (pp. 1–14). Division for Early Childhood.

47.

(2020). Engaging families of young children with disabilities through family-school-community partnerships. Early Child Development and Care, 190, 1959–1968. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1552950

48.

Yosso

T. J.

(2005). Who culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 8(1), 69–91. http://doi.org/10/1080/1361332052000341006

49.

Zeitlin

V. M.

Curcic

(2014). Parental voices on Individualized Education Plans: “Oh, IEP meeting tomorrow? Rum tonight!” Disability & Society, 29(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.776493