This study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of Prevent-Teach-Reinforce for Young Children (PTR-YC) using a single-case experimental design. PTR-YC is a manualized intervention designed to address challenging behaviors for children in preschool and childcare settings using the framework of positive behavior support. Participants included three preschool-aged children who were receiving special education services in public preschool classrooms. As hypothesized, the use of PTR-YC resulted in two primary effects, including a decrease in challenging behaviors and an increase in desirable behaviors across all three cases. Secondary data revealed favorable increases in prosocial (or positive) interactions between teacher and child for all three cases. PTR-YC interventions were also associated with high rates of perceived social validity. Implications for the use of PTR-YC in preschool settings are discussed along with considerations for the importance of coaching to increase fidelity and the effect on teacher–child interactions.
BagnatoS. J.GoinsD. D.Pretti-FrontczakK.NeisworthJ. T. (2014). Authentic assessment as “best practice” for early childhood intervention: National consumer social validity research. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34, 116–127.
2.
BaileyK. M.BlairK. C. (2015). Feasibility and potential efficacy of the family-centered Prevent-Teach-Reinforce model with families of children with developmental disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 47, 218–233. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.09.019
3.
BarnesS. A. (2015). An evaluation of the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce model within a multi-tiered intervention system (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of South Florida, Tampa.
4.
BrownF.AndersonJ.De PryR. (Eds.). (2015). Individual positive behavior supports: A standards-based guide to practices in school and community settings. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
5.
CampbellS. B. (1995). Behavior problems in preschool children: A review of recent research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 113–149.
6.
CarrJ. E. (2005). Recommendations for reporting multiple-baseline designs across participants. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 219–224. doi:10.1002/bin.191
7.
ConroyM. A.BrownW. H. (2004). Early identification, prevention, and early intervention with young children at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders: Issues, trends, and a call for action. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 224–236.
8.
ConroyM. A.DunlapG.ClarkeS.AlterP. (2005). A descriptive analysis of positive behavioral interven-tion research with young children with challenging behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25, 157–166.
9.
CoonJ. C.RappJ. T. (2018). Application of multiple baseline designs in behavior analytic research: Evidence for the influence of new guidelines. Behavioral Interventions, 33, 160–172.
10.
DeJagerB. W.FilterK. J. (2015). Effects of Prevent-Teach-Reinforce on academic engagement and disruptive behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31, 369–391. doi:10.1080/15377903.2015.1084966
11.
DenhamS. A. (2006). Social–emotional competence as support for school readiness: What is it and how do we assess it?Early Education and Development, 17, 57–89.
Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
14.
DunlapG.FoxL. (1996). Early intervention and serious problem behaviors: A comprehensive approach. In KoegelL. K.KoegelR. L.DunlapG. (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 31–50). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
DunlapG.FoxL. (2011). Function-based interventions for children with challenging behavior. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 333–343.
16.
DunlapG.LeeJ. K.JosephJ. D.StrainP. (2015). A model for increasing the fidelity and effectiveness of interventions for challenging behaviors: Prevent-Teach-Reinforce for Young Children. Infants & Young Children, 28, 3–17.
17.
DunlapG.StrainP. S.FoxL.CartaJ. J.ConroyM.SmithB.. . . SowellC. (2006). Prevention and intervention with young children’s challenging behavior: A summary and perspective regarding current knowledge. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 29–45.
18.
DunlapG.StrainP. S.LeeJ. K.JosephJ. D.LeechN. (2018). A randomized controlled evaluation of Prevent-Teach-Reinforce for Young Children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37, 195–205. doi:10.1177/0271121417724874
19.
DunlapG.WilsonK.StrainP.LeeJ. K. (2013). Prevent-Teach-Reinforce for Young Children: The early childhood model of individualized positive behavior support. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
20.
FerreiraT.CadimaJ.MatiasM.VieiraJ.LealT.MatosP. (2016). Preschool children’s prosocial behavior: The role of mother–child, father–child and teacher–child relationships. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 1829–1839. doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0369
21.
FettigA.SchultzT. R.SreckovicM. A. (2015). Effects of coaching on the implementation of functional assessment-based parent intervention in reducing challenging behaviors. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 170–180.
22.
FiskeK.DelmolinoL. (2012). Use of discontinuous methods of data collection in behavioral intervention: Guidelines for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 77–81.
23.
FoxL.DunlapG.HemmeterM. L.JosephG. E.StrainP. S. (2003). The teaching pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58, 48–52.
24.
FronapfelB.DunlapG.FlagtvedtK.StrainP.LeeJ. (2018). Prevent-Teach-Reinforce for Young Children: A program description and demonstration of implementation in an early childhood setting. Education & Treatment of Children, 41, 233–248.
25.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2010). Variations of multiple baseline designs and combination designs. In GastD. L. (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 382–416). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
Grisham-BrownJ.HemmeterM. L.Pretti-FrontczakK. (2017). Blended practices for teaching young children in inclusive settings (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
28.
GülayH. (2011). Assessment of the prosocial behaviors of young children with regard to social development, social skills, parental acceptance-rejection and peer relationships. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38, 164–172.
29.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through either grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638.
30.
HarveyM.MayM.KennedyC. (2004). Nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs and the evaluation of educational systems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 267–276. doi:10.1023/B:JOBE.0000044735.51022.5d
31.
HughesJ. N. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and school adjustment: Progress and remaining challenges. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 319–327.
32.
IovannoneR.GreenbaumP.WangW.DunlapG.KincaidD. (2014). Reliability of an individualized behavior rating scale tool for progress monitoring. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39, 195–207.
33.
IovannoneR.GreenbaumP.WangW.KincaidD.DunlapG.StrainP. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce (PTR) tertiary intervention for students with problem behaviors: Preliminary outcomes. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 213–225.
34.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. New York, NY: Pearson.
35.
LaneJ. D.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Using interval-based systems to measure behavior in early childhood special education and early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34, 83–93. doi:10.1177/0271121414524063
36.
LanovazM. J.HuxleyS. C.DufourM. M. (2017). Using the dual-criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: An analysis of nonsimulated data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 662–667.
37.
MejiaT. M.HoglundW. L. G. (2016). Do children’s adjustment problems contribute to teacher–child relationships quality? Support for a child-driven model. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 34, 13–26. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.08.003
38.
NovotnyM. A.SharpK. J.RappJ. T.JelinskiJ. D.LoodE. A.SteffesA. K.MaM. (2014). False positives with visual analysis for nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs and ABAB designs: Preliminary findings. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 933–943. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.04.009
39.
O’ConnorE. E.DearingE.CollinsB. A. (2011). Teacher-child relationship and behavior problem trajectories in elementary school. American Education Research Journal, 48, 120–162. doi:10.3102/0002831210365008
40.
ReichowB.BoydB. A.BartonE. E.OdomS. L. (2016). Handbook of early childhood special education. New York, NY: Springer.
41.
ReimersT.WackerD. P. (1988). Parents’ ratings of the acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendations made in an outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment effectiveness. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 7–15.
42.
SabolT. J.PiantaR. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-child relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 213–231.
43.
SearsK. M.BlairK. C.IovannoneR.CroslandK. (2013). Using the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce model with families of young children with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1005–1016.
44.
ShonkoffJ. P.PhillipsD. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45.
SilverR. B.MeaselleJ. R.ArmstrongJ. M.EssexM. J. (2005). Trajectories of classroom externalizing behavior: Contributions of child characteristics, family characteristics, and the teacher–child relationship during the school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 39–60.
46.
SimeonssonR. J. (1991). Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention in early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 124–134.
47.
SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.FoxL. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practice-based coaching. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 133–143. doi:10.1177/027112141559492
48.
SnyderP. A.RakapS.HemmeterM. L.McLaughlinT. W.SandallS.McLeanM. E. (2015). Naturalistic instructional approaches in early learning: A systematic review. Journal of Early Intervention, 37, 69–97.
49.
StrainP. S.BoveyE. H. (2011). Randomized, controlled trial of the LEAP model of early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 133-154.
50.
StrainP. S.DunlapG.HarveyH. (2018). A functional assessment model for challenging behaviors: Prevent-Teach-Reinforce for Young Children. In SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L. (Eds.), Division for Early Childhood Recommended Practices Monograph Series No. 4: Instruction (pp. 119–130). Los Angeles, CA: Division for Early Childhood.
51.
StrainP. S.WilsonK.DunlapG. (2011). Prevent-Teach-Reinforce: Addressing problem behaviors of students with autism in general education classrooms. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 160–171.
