Early detection efforts have been shown to vary greatly in practice, and there is a general lack of systematic accountability built into monitoring early detection effort impact. This article reviews current early detection practices and the drawbacks of these practices, with particular attention given to prevalent issues of mismeasurement, misuse, and mismanagement across the Child Find system under Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The benefits of a nationally recognized research and/or consensus-driven “baseline definition” for which children should be deemed Early Intervention (EI) or Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) eligible are discussed. Recommendations are provided to better identify and serve young children with developmental-behavioral problems (as well as their families), and to cultivate more cohesive standards for professional practice in referring children for appropriate medical, social, and educational services.
AdamsR. C.TapiaC., & The Council on Children With Disabilities. (2013). Early intervention, IDEA Part C services, and the medical home: Collaboration for best practice and best outcomes. Pediatrics, 132, e1073–e1088.
2.
AylwardG. P. (2009). Developmental screening and assessment: What are we thinking?Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 30, 169–175.
3.
BagnatoS. J.McLeanM.MacyM.NeisworthJ. (2012). Identifying instructional targets for early childhood via authentic assessment: Alignment of professional standards and practice-based evidence. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 243–253.
4.
BagnatoS. J.NeisworthJ. T.Pretti-FrontczakK. L. (2010). LINKing authentic assessment and early childhood intervention: Best measures for best practices (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
5.
BaileyD.ScarboroughA.HebbelerK. (2003). National early intervention longitudinal study: Executive summary (NEILS Data Report No. 2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
6.
BaileyD. B.Jr.McWilliamR. A.DarkesL. A.HebbelerK.SimeonssonR. J.SpikerD.WagnerM. (1998). Family outcomes in early intervention: A framework for program evaluation and efficacy research. Exceptional Children, 64, 313–328.
7.
BoyleC. A.BouletS.SchieveL. A.CohenR. A.BlumbergS. J.Yeargin-AllsoppM.. . . KoganM. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US Children, 1997-2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034–1042.
8.
BrickerD.MacyM.SquiresJ.MarksK. (2013). Developmental screening in your community: An integrated approach for connecting children with services. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
9.
BrownS. E.GuralnickM. J. (2012). International human rights to early intervention for infants and young children with disabilities: Tools for global advocacy. Infants and Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices, 25, 270–285.
10.
CampB. W. (2006). What the clinician really needs to know: Questioning the clinical usefulness of sensitivity and specificity in studies of screening tests. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 27, 226–230.
CasanuevaC. E.CrossT. P.RingeisenH. (2008). Developmental needs and individualized family service plans among infants and toddlers in the child welfare system. Child Maltreatment, 13, 245–258.
13.
CoxJ. E.HuntingtonN.SaadaA.Epee-BounyaA.ShonwaldA. D. (2010). Developmental screening and parents’ written comments: An added dimension to the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status Questionnaire. Pediatrics, 126, 170–176.
14.
Division for Early Childhood. (2007). Promoting positive outcomes for children with disabilities: Recommendations for curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. Missoula, MT: Author.
15.
DreuM.RaymaekersR.WarreynP.SchietecatteI.MeirsschautM.RoeyersH. (2012). Can child care workers contribute to the early detection of autism spectrum disorders? A comparison between screening instruments with child care workers versus parent as informants. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 781–796.
16.
EdwardsN.GallagherP. A.GreenK. B. (2013). Existing and proposed child find initiatives in one state’s part c program. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 32, 11–19.
17.
FeilE. G.SeversonH. H.WalkerH. M. (1998). Screening for emotional and behavioral delays: The early screening project. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 252–266.
18.
FeinbergE.SilversteinM.DonahueS.BlissR. (2011). The impact of race on participation in Part C early intervention services. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 32, 284–291.
19.
FieseB. H.SpagnolaM.EverhartR. S. (2008). Family context in developmental-behavioral pediatrics. In WolraichM.DworkinP.DrotarD.PerrinE. (Eds.), Developmental-behavioral pediatrics: Evidence and practice (pp. 79–108). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.
20.
GarcíaS. B.OrtizA. B. (2006). Preventing disproportionate representation: Culturally and responsive prereferral interventions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 64–68.
21.
GlascoeF. P. (1997). Parents’ concerns about children’s development: Prescreening technique or screening test?Pediatrics, 99, 522–528.
22.
GlascoeF. P. (2001). Are over-referrals on developmental screening tests really a problem?Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155, 1–10.
23.
GlascoeF. P. (2006). If you don’t ask, parentsmaynot tell: Noticing problems vs. expressing concerns. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160, 220–221.
24.
GlascoeF. P. (2013). Collaborating with parents’ (2nd ed.). Nolensville, TN: PEDSTest.com
25.
GlascoeF. P.DworkinP. H. (1993). Obstacles to effective developmental surveillance: Errors in clinical reasoning. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 14, 344–349.
26.
GlascoeF. P.MarksK. P.PoonJ. K.MaciasM. M. (2013). Identifying and addressing developmental-behavioral problems: A practical guide for medical and non-medical professionals, trainees, researchers, and advocates. Nolensville, TN: PEDSTest.com.
27.
GloverT.AlbersC. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 117–135.
28.
GouldS. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
29.
GrantR.IsaksonE. A. (2013). Regional variations in early intervention utilization for children with developmental delay. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17, 1252–1259.
30.
Grisham-BrownJ.Pretti-FrontczakP. (2011). Assessing young children in inclusive settings: The blended practices approach. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
31.
GuevaraJ. P.GerdesM.LocalioR.HuangY. V.Pinto-MartinJ.MinkovitzC. S.. . .PatiS. (2013). Effectiveness of developmental screening in an urban setting. Pediatrics, 131, 30–37.
32.
HarryB. (2008). Collaboration with culturally and linguistically diverse families: Ideal versus reality. Exceptional Children, 74, 372–388.
33.
HollandM.MerrellK. W. (1998). Social emotional characteristics of preschool-aged children referred for Child Find screening and assessment: A comparative study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 167–179.
34.
JenningsD. J.HanlineM. F. (2013). Developmental screening referrals: Child and family factors that predict referral completion. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33, 102–111.
35.
KingT. M.TandonD.MaciasM. M.HealyJ. A.DuncanP. M.SwigonskiN. L.. . .LipkinP. H. (2010). Implementing developmental screening and referrals: Lessons learned from a national project. Pediatrics, 125, 350–360.
36.
LosardoA.Notari-SyversonA. (2011). Alternative approaches to assessing young children (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
37.
MacyM. (2012). The evidence behind developmental screening instruments. Infants and Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices, 25, 19–61.
38.
MarksK.Hix-SmallH.ClarkK.NewmanJ. (2009). Lowering developmental screening thresholds and raising quality improvement for preterm children. Pediatrics, 123, 1516–1523.
39.
MarksK. P. (2007). Should general pediatricians not select the Ages and Stages Questionnaire in light of the Rydz et al. study?Pediatrics, 120, 457–458.
40.
MarksK. P.DunkleM.SquiresJ.BrickerD.GlascoeF. P.MacyM. (2013). Clear national standards needed to detect and effectively help infants and toddlers with developmental-behavioral challenges. Pediatrics e-letter, 131.
41.
MarksK. P.GlascoeF. P.MaciasM. M. (2011). Enhancing the algorithm for developmental-behavioral surveillance and screening in children 0 to 5 years. Clinical Pediatrics, 123, 1516–1523.
42.
MarksK. P.LaRosaA. C. (2012). Understanding developmental-behavioral screening measures. Pediatrics in Review, 33, 448–458.
43.
McKayK. (2006). Evaluating model programs to support dissemination. An evaluation of strengthening the developmental surveillance and referral practices of child health providers. Journal of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, 27, S26–S29.
44.
McLeanM. E.SnyderP.SmithB. J.SandallS. R. (2002). The DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education: Social validation. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 120–128.
45.
McManusB.McCormickM. C.Acevedo-GarciaD.GanzM.Hauser-CramP. (2009). The effect of state early intervention eligibility policy on participation among a cohort of young CSHCN. Pediatrics, 124 (Suppl. 4), S368–S374.
46.
McWilliamR. A. (2005). Assessing the resource needs of families in the context of early intervention. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), The developmental systems approach to early intervention (pp. 215–234). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
47.
MinkovitzC. S.HughartN.StrobinoD.ScharfsteinD.GrasonH.HouW.. . .GuyerB. (2003). A practice-based intervention to enhance quality of care in the first 3 years of life: The healthy for young children program. Journal of American Medical Association, 290, 3081–3091.
48.
MinkovitzC. S.StrobinoD.MistryK. B.ScharfsteinD. O.GrasonH.HouW.. . .GuyerB. (2007). Healthy steps for young children: Sustained results at 5.5 years. Pediatrics, 120(3), e658–e668.
49.
National Research Council. (2008). Early childhood assessment: Why, what, and how. Committee on Developmental Outcomes and Assessments for Young Children, SnowC. E.Van HemelS. B. (Eds.), Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
50.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development, ShonkoffJ. P.PhillipsD. A. (Eds.), Board on Children, Youth and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51.
NeisworthJ. T.BagnatoS. J. (2004). The mismeasure of young children: The authentic assessment alternative. Infants and Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices, 17(3), 198–212.
52.
NeisworthJ. T.BagnatoS. J. (2005). DEC recommended practices: Assessment. In SandallS.HemmeterM. L.SmithB. J.McLeanM. E. (Eds.), DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education (pp. 45–69). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
53.
NiedermanL.G.SchwartzA.ConnellK.J.SilvermanK. (2007). Healthy steps for young children program in pediatric residency training: Impact on primary care outcomes. Pediatrics, 120(3), e596–e603.
54.
RadeckiL.Sand-LoudN.O’ConnorK. G.SharpS.OlsonS. (2011). Trends in the use of standardized tools for developmental screening in early childhood: 2002–2009. Pediatrics, 32, 2010–2180.
55.
RingwaltS. (2012). Summary table of states’ and territories’ definitions of/criteria for IDEA Part C eligibility. National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center (NECTAC). Retrieved from http://nectac.org/~pdfs/topics/earlyid/partc_elig_table.pdf
56.
RosenbergS. A.RobinsonC. C.ShawE. F.EllisonM. C. (2013). Part C early intervention for infants and toddlers: Percentage eligible versus served. Pediatrics, 131, 38–46.
RydzD.SrourM.OskouiM.MargetN.ShillerM.BirnbaumR.. . .ShevellM. I. (2007). Screening for developmental delay in the setting of a community pediatric clinic: A prospective assessment of parent-report questionnaires. Pediatrics, 118, 1178–1186.
59.
SandN.SilverstienM.GlascoeF. P.GuptaV. B.TonnigesT. P.O’ConnorK. G. (2005). Pediatricians’ reported practices regarding developmental screening: Do guidelines work? Do they help?Pediatrics, 116, 174–179.
60.
ShannonP.AndersonP. R. (2008). Developmental screening in community health care centers and pediatric practices: An evaluation of the Baby Steps Program. Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 46, 281–289.
61.
ShapiroB. J.DerringtonT. M. (2004). Equity and disparity in access to services: An outcomes-based evaluation of early intervention child find in Hawai’i. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24, 195–207.
62.
SheldrickR. C.MerchantS.PerrinE. C. (2011). Identification of developmental-behavioral problems in primary care: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 128, 356–363.
63.
SpikerD.HebbelerK.WagnerM.CametoR.McKennaP. (2000). A framework for describing variations in state early intervention systems. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 199–212.
U.S. Public Health Service. (2000). Report of the surgeon general’s conference on children’s mental health: A national action agenda. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
66.
WardH.YoonA.AtkinsJ.MorriesP.OldhamE.WathenK. (2009). Children at risk in the child welfare system: Collaborations to promote school readiness. University of Southern Maine, Catherine E Cutler Institute for Child and Family Policy. Retrieved from http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/schoolreadiness
67.
WilliamsM. E.PerrigoJ. L.BandaT. Y.MaticT.GoldfarbF. D. (2013). Barriers to accessing services for young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 61–74.
68.
YellM. L.KatsiyannisA.CollinsJ. C. (2010). Compton unified school district v. Starvenia Addison: Child find activities and response to intervention. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21, 67–69.
69.
ZuckermanB.ParkerS.Kaplan-SanoffM.AugustynM.BarthM. C. (2004). Healthy steps: A case study of innovation in pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 114, 820–826.
70.
ZuckermanK. E.MattoxK.DonelanK.BatbayarO.BaghaeeA.BethellC. (2013). Pediatrician identification of Latino children at risk for autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics, 132, 445–453.
