The early childhood professionals recognize the limitations of conventional testing with young children. This recognition has given rise to Authentic Assessment, now recognized officially as best practice by the major professional organizations. However, no national studies have been conducted to document the comparative qualities of either authentic or conventional approaches—according to meaningful external standards. Based on a national Internet survey of professionals, we report details of a social validity study of common measurement methods on eight operationally defined standards for developmentally appropriate assessment linked to professionally sanctioned practice standards and indicators. Approximately 1,500 professional responses reveal higher quality appraisals for authentic assessment over conventional testing methods for early childhood intervention purposes. Based on these results, we offer recommendations to advance valid, sensible, and contextually appropriate assessment for early childhood intervention.
BagnatoS. J. (2005). The authentic alternative for assessment in early intervention: An emerging evidence-based practice. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 17–22.
3.
BagnatoS. J.FevolaA.Smith-JonesJ.MatesaM. (2005). Research foundations for clinical judgment (informed opinion) in early intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
4.
BagnatoS. J.FevolaA.Smith-JonesJ.MatesaM. (2006). Research support for presumptive eligibility in early intervention: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
5.
BagnatoS. J.HoH. Y. (2006). High-stakes testing with preschool children: Violation of professional standards for evidence-based practice in early childhood intervention. KEDI International Journal of Educational Policy, 3(1), 22–43.
6.
BagnatoS. J.McKeating-EsterleE.BartolomasiP. (2007). Evidence-base for team assessment practices in early intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
7.
BagnatoS. J.McKeating-EsterleE.BartolamasiP.NeisworthJ. T. (2008). Valid use of clinical judgment (informed opinion) for early intervention eligibility evidence base and practice characteristics. Infants & Young Children, 21, 334–349.
8.
BagnatoS. J.NeisworthJ. T.Pretti-FrontczakK. (2010). LINKing authentic assessment and early childhood intervention: Best measures for best practices (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
9.
BrackenB. (2013). Riverside Early Assessment of Learning (REAL). Rolling Meadows, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
10.
BredekampS.CoppleC. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
11.
Division for Early Childhood. (2007). Promoting positive outcomes for children with disabilities: Recommendations for curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. Missoula, MT: Author.
12.
DunstC. J.TrivetteC. M.ApplD. J.BagnatoS. J. (2004). Framework for investigating child find, referral, early identification, and eligibility determination practices. TRACElines, 1(1), 1–11.
13.
FosterS. L.MashE. J. (1999). Assessing social validity in clinical treatment research issues and procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 308–319.
14.
GreshamF. M. (1983). Social validity in the assessment of children’s social skills: Establishing standards for social competency. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 299–307. doi:10.1177/073428298300100309
15.
HoH.BagnatoS. J. (2008). Research foundations for early intervention eligibility based upon deficits in social and self-regulatory behavior. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
16.
MacyM.BagnatoS. J.LehmanC.SalawayJ. (2007). Research foundations of conventional tests and testing to ensure accurate and representative early intervention eligibility. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
17.
MacyM.BagnatoS. J.SalawayJ.LehmanC. (2007). Research foundations of authentic assessments ensure accurate and representative early intervention eligibility. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council. (2002). NAS/NRC report on minority students in special education. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education. (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation: Building an effective, accountable system in programs for children birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/pscape.pdf
21.
National Research Council. (2008). Recognizing and responding to the developmental and learning challenges of young children early childhood assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies.
22.
NeisworthJ. T.BagnatoS. J. (2005). DEC recommended practices: Assessment. In SandallS.HemmeterM. L.SmithB. J.McLeanM. E. (Eds.). DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education (pp. 45–70). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
23.
SandallS.HemmeterM. L.SmithB. J.McLeanM. (2005). DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education. Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood.
24.
SchultzT.KaganS. L. (2007). Taking stock: Assessing and improving early childhood learning and program quality. Washington, DC: National Early Childhood Accountability Task Force, PEW Foundation.
25.
SchwartzI. S.BaerD. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-189
26.
TuranY.MeadanH. (2011). Social validity assessment in early childhood special education. Young Exceptional Children, 14(3), 13–28. doi:10.1177/1096250611415812
27.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
28.
ZaslowM.CalkinsJ.HalleT.ZaffJ.MargieN. G. (2000). Community-level school readiness: Definitions, assessments. Washington, DC: Child Trends, Knight Foundation.
