This study researched the predictive impact of developmental screening results and the effects of child and family characteristics on completion of referrals given for evaluation. Logistical and hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to determine the significance of 10 independent variables on the predictor variable. The number of concerns was the most significant variable in predicting screening referral outcomes. Health concerns noted in child screening results were highly predictive of having no referral evaluation completed. Social-emotional concerns had a less striking but consistently negative relationship with referral completion. Speech-language delays and developmental concerns were not significant predictors. Being female and White were strong predictors of completed referrals. The findings have implications for the timing of referrals for children’s atypical screening results and underscore the importance of follow-up in developmental screening referrals made for children with multiple areas of concern and for those who have specific health concerns.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Children with Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee; Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Health Project Advisory Committee. (2006). Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics, 118, 405–420.
2.
ArciaE.KeyesL.GallagherJ.HerrickH. (1993). National portrait of sociodemographic factors associated with underutilization of services: Relevance to early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 283–297.
3.
BruderM. B.DunstC. J.Morgo-WilsonC. (2009). Child factors associated with enrollment in Part C early intervention among children adopted from China. Journal of Early Intervention, 32, 54–67.
4.
CoxJ. E.HuntingtonN.SaadaA.Epee-BounyaA.SchonwaldA. D. (2010). Developmental screening and parents’ written comments: An added dimension to the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status Questionnaire. Pediatrics, 126, 170–176.
5.
DobrezD.Lo SassoA.HollJ.ShalowitzM.LeonS.BudettiP. (2001). Estimating the cost of developmental and behavioral screening of preschool children in general pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 108, 913–922.
6.
DunstC. J.TrivetteC. M.ApplD. J.BagnatoS. J. (2004). Framework for investigating child find, referral, early identification and eligibility determination practices. Tracelines, 1(1), 1–11. Retrieved from http://www.tracecenter.info/tracelines/tracelines_vol1_no1.pdf
7.
EarleM. F.AndrewsJ. E.HayS. S. (2009). A longitudinal study of developmental and behavioral screening and referral in North Carolina’s Assuring Better Child Health and Development participating practices. Clinical Pediatrics, 48, 824–833.
8.
FaganM. K.MontgomeryT. R. (2009). Managing referrals for children with receptive language delay. Clinical Pediatrics, 48, 72–80.
9.
GiannoniP. P.KassP. H. (2012). Predictors of developmental outcomes of high-risk and developmentally delayed infants and children enrolled in a state early childhood intervention program. Infants and Young Children, 25, 244–264.
10.
GlascoeF. P.LeewS. (2010). Parenting behaviors, perceptions, and psychosocial risk: Impacts on young children’s development. Pediatrics, 125, 313–319.
11.
HallamR. A.RousB.GroveJ.Lo BiancoT. (2009). Level and intensity of early intervention services for infants and toddlers with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 31, 179–196.
12.
KayeN.MayJ. (2009). State strategies to support practice changes that improve identification of children at risk for or with developmental delays: Findings from the ABCD screening academy. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy.
13.
KingT. M.GlascoeF. P. (2003). Developmental surveillance of infants and young children in pediatric primary care. Current Opinions in Pediatrics, 15(6), 624–629.
14.
KingT. M.TandonS. D.MaciasM. M.HealyJ. A.DuncanP. M.SwigonskiN. L.LipkinP. H. (2010). Implementing developmental screenings and referrals: Lessons learned from a national project. Pediatrics, 125(2), 350–360.
15.
KuczmarskiR. J.OgdenC. L.GuoS. S. (2002). 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: Methods and development. Vital Health Stat11(246), 1–190
16.
LiberatosP.LinkB. G.KelseyJ. K. (1988). The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiology Review, 10, 87–120.
17.
MacyM. (2012). The evidence behind developmental screening instruments. Infants and Young Children, 25, 19–61.
18.
MaloneD. G.GallagherP. A. (2008). Transition to preschool programs for young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 30, 341–356.
19.
MannE. A.McCartneyK.ParkJ. M. (2007). Preschool predictors of the need for early remedial and special education services. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 273–285.
20.
Mardell-CzudnowskiC.GoldenbergD. (1998). Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning (3rd ed). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
21.
MarksK.Hix-SmallH.ClarkK.NewmanJ. (2009). Lowering developmental screening thresholds and raising quality improvements for preterm children. Pediatrics, 123, 1516–1523.
22.
MeiselsS.MargolisL. (1988). Is the early periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment program effective in developmentally delayed children?Pediatrics, 81, 262–271.
23.
NelsonH. D.NygrenP.WalkerM.PanaoschaR. (2006). Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: Systematic evidence review for the U.S. preventative services task force. Pediatrics Electronic Pages, (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1467). Retrieved from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/117/6/2336.full.html
Pizur-BarnekowK.EricksonS.JohnsonM.BassT.LucinskiL.BluelD. (2010). Early identification of developmental delays through surveillance, screening, and diagnostic evaluation. Infants & Young Children, 23, 323–330.
26.
RichardsonL.Selby-HarringtonM.KrowchukH.CrossA.WilliamsD. (1994). Comprehensiveness of well-child checkups for children on Medicaid: A pilot study. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 8(5), 212–220.
27.
RossettiL. (2006). Infant-toddler language scale. East Moline, IL: LingiSystems.
28.
RushtonJ.BruckmanD.KelleherK. (2002). Primary care referral of children with psychosocial problems. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 156, 592–598.
29.
SchonwaldA.HuntingtonN.WittK.SilverT.CoxJ. (2008). Evaluation rates of children identified by routine developmental screening. Honolulu, HI: Pediatric Academic Societies.
30.
ShonkoffJ. P.GarnerA. S. & Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care, and Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129, 2011–2663.
31.
SicesL.FeudtnerC.McLaughlinJ.DrotarD.WilliamsM. (2003). How do primary care physicians identify young children with developmental delays? A national survey. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 24, 409–417.
32.
SquiresJ.BrickerD.TwomblyM. (2002). Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social Emotional. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
33.
SquiresJ.TwomblyM.BrickerD.PotterL. (2009). Ages & Stages Questionnaire. 3rd Ed.Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
34.
TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J. (2006). Tracking pathways of referrals to early intervention. Morganton, NC: Tracking, Referral and Assessment Center for Excellence.
35.
WanlessS. B.McClellandM. M.TomineyS. L.AcockA. C. (2011). The influence of demographic risk factors on children’s behavioral regulation in prekindergarten and kindergarten. Early Education and Development, 22, 461–488.
36.
ZimmermanI.SteinerV.PondR. (2002). The preschool language scale. 4th Ed.San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
