This study investigated the effects of a supplemental early reading intervention program on the phonemic awareness and alphabetic principle skills of students identified as at risk for reading failure. Seven kindergarten students and one firstgrade student received 20 min of supplemental reading instruction 3 days a week for 16, 12, and 8 weeks. The researcher and a paraprofessional implemented the intervention in a coteaching format. A multiple-baseline-across-subjects design was used to analyze the effects of the instruction on Phoneme-Segmentation Fluency (PSF; Good & Kaminski, 2002) and Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF; Good & Kaminski, 2002) skills of target students. The results indicated that students made moderate to substantial increases in PSF and NWF as a result of the intervention. Supplemental reading intervention with systematic and explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and the alphabetic principle may be used to improve important literacy skills in kindergarten students identified as at risk for reading failure. The results also indicate that paraprofessionals can be taught to provide effective early reading intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 300—316.
2.
Ball, E.W., & Blachman, B.A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly, 26(1), 49—66.
3.
Bursuck, W.D., Smith, T., Munk, D., Damer, M., Mehlig, L., & Perry, J. (2004). Evaluating the impact of a prevention-based model of reading on children who are at-risk. Remedial and Special Education, 25(5), 303—313.
4.
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 313—321.
5.
Cavanaugh, C.L., Kim, A., Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Kindergarten reading interventions for at-risk students: Twenty years of research. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2(1), 9— 21.
Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219—232.
8.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test (Rev. ed.). Shoreview, MN: American Guidance Service.
9.
Dunst, C.J., Hamby, D.W., & Trivette, C.M. (2004). Guidelines for calculating effect sizes for practice-based research syntheses. Centerscope , 3(1), 1—10.
10.
Ehri, L.C. (1983). A critique of five studies related to letter-name knowledge and learning to read. In L. M. Gentile , M. L. Kamil, & J. S. Blanchard (Eds.), Reading research revisited (pp. 143—153). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
11.
Foorman, B.R., Chen, D., Carlson, C., Moats, L., Francis, D.J., & Fletcher, J.M. (2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 289—324.
12.
Foorman, B.R., Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Schatschneider, C.S., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 37—55.
13.
Foorman, B.R., & Moats, L.C. (2004). Conditions for sustaining research-based practices in early reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education , 25(1), 51—60.
14.
Foorman, B.R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M.N., Fletcher, J.M., Moats, L.C., & Francis, D.J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in Grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 1—29.
15.
French, N.K. (2001). Supervising paraprofessionals: A survey of teacher practices. The Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 41—53.
16.
Good, R.H., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R.A. (2001). Best practices in using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an outcome-driven model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 679—700). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
17.
Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available at http://dibels.uoregon.edu
18.
Greenwood, C.R., & Maheady, L. (1997). Measurable change in student performance: Forgotten standard in teacher preparation?Teacher Education and Special Education, 20(3), 265—275.
19.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437—447.
20.
Kame'enui, E.J., Good, R., III, & Harn, B.A. (2005). Beginning reading failure and the quantification of risk: Reading behavior as the supreme index. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, N. A. Neef, S. M. Peterson , D. M. Sainato, G. Cartledge, et al. (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 88—89). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
21.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single case research designs: Methods for critical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Lane, K.L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). School-based interventions: The tools you need to succeed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Lane, K.L., Menzies, H.M., Munton, S.M., Von Duering, R.M., & English, G.L. (2005). The effects of a supplemental early literacy program for a student at risk: A case study. Preventing School Failure , 50(1), 21—28.
24.
Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino, P.T. (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 390—398.
25.
Lyon, R. (2003). What principals need to know about reading. Principal (Reston, VA), 83 (2), 14—18.
26.
Mathes, P.G., & Torgesen, J.K. (1998). All children can learn to read: Critical care for the prevention of reading failure. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(3&4), 317—340.
27.
Moats, L.C. (2005, February). Teaching reading is rocket science. Presentation at the Ohio Reading Summit, Columbus, OH.
28.
O'Connor, R.E., Jenkins, J.R., & Slocum, T.A. (1995). Transfer among phonological tasks in kindergarten: Essential instructional content. Journal of Educational Psychology , 87(2), 202—217.
29.
O'Shaughnessy, T.E., & Swanson, H.L. (2000). A comparison of two reading interventions for children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 257—277.
30.
Parker, R.I., Brossart, D.F., Vannest, K.J., Long, J.R., Garcia De-Alba, R., Roman, B., et al. (2005). Effect sizes in single case research: How large is large?School Psychology Review, 34(1), 116—132.
31.
Roth, F.P., Speece, D.H., & Cooper, D.H. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the connection between oral language and early reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 259—272.
32.
Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2003). Early Reading Intervention . Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman. Retrieved December 14, 2003, from http://www.scottforesman.com/eri/index.cfm
33.
Simmons, D.C., Kame'enui, E.J., Harn, B.A., Thomas-Beck, C., Edwards, L.L., Coyne, M.D., et al. (2003). A summary of the research findings of Project Optimize: Improving the early literacy skills of kindergartners at-risk for reading difficulties using effective design and delivery principles. Retrieved May 6, 2004, from http://reading.uoregon.edu/curricula/opt_research.pdf .
34.
Slavin, R.E., Karweit, N.L., & Madden, N.A. (1989). Effective programs for students at risk. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
35.
Speece, D.L., Mills, C., Ritchey, K.D., & Hillman, E. (2003). Initial evidence that letter fluency tasks are valid indicators of early reading skill. The Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 223—233.
36.
Torgesen, J.K. (2003). Operationalizing the response to intervention model to identify children with learning disabilities: Specific issues with older children. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium , Kansas City, MO. Retrieved March 23, 2006, from http://nrcld.org/symposium2003/torgesen/index.html
37.
Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Peyton, J.A. (2005). Relative effectiveness of reading practice or word-level instruction in supplemental tutoring: How text matters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 364—380.
38.
Washington, J.A. (2001). Early literacy skills in African-American children: Research considerations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), 213—221.
39.
Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock— Johnson III tests of achievement . Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing .
40.
Yeh, S.S. (2003). An evaluation of two approaches for teaching phonemic awareness to children in Head Start. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 513—529.
