The phenomenon of technological hazards, whose existence is only revealed many years after they were initially produced, shows that the question of our responsibilities toward future generations is of urgent importance. However, the nature of technological societies means that they are caught in a condition of structural irresponsibility: the tools they use to know the future cannot encompass the temporal reach of their actions. This article explores how dominant legal and moral concepts are equally deficient for helping us understand what future-oriented responsibility requires. An alternative understanding of responsibility is needed, one which can be developed from phenomenological and feminist concepts of care. Care, by opening up for us an understanding of the diversity of values that are constitutive of a worthwhile life, also connects us to the future as the future of care. As such, it provides us with ethical resources that can guide us in the face of uncertainty.
Di Paolo, E. ( 2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 429-452.
7.
Espeland, W.N., & Stevens, M.L. ( 1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313-343.
8.
Frankfurt, H. ( 1982). The importance of what we care about. Synthèse, 53, 257-272.
9.
Fraser, I. ( 1998). Hegel and Marx: The concept of need. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh Press .
10.
Friedman, M. ( 1993). What are friends for? Feminist perspectives on personal relationships and moral theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
Giddens, A. ( 1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
Gilligan, C. ( 1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
13.
Goodin, R. ( 1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Groves, C. ( 2009). Nanotechnology, contingency and finitude. Nanoethics, 3, 1-16.
15.
Heidegger, M. ( 1998). Being and time. Oxford, England: Blackwell. Ingarden, R. (1970). Über die Verantwortung [On the responsibility]. Stuttgart , Germany: Reclam.
16.
Jacobs, M. ( 1991). The green economy. London, England: Pluto Press.
17.
Jonas, H. ( 1982). The phenomenon of life. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
18.
Jonas, H. ( 1984). The imperative of responsibility. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Kant, I. ( 1993). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Trans. James Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.
20.
Kittay, E.F., Jennings, B., & Wasunna, A.A. ( 2005). Dependency, difference and the global ethic of longterm care. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 443-469.
21.
Kohlberg, L. ( 1981). Essays on moral development, Vol. I: The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
22.
Koppe, J.G., & Keys, J. ( 2001). PCBs and the precautionary principle. In P. Harremöes, D. Gee, M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys , B. Wynne, & S. Guedes Vaz (Eds.), Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896-2000 (Vol. 22, pp. 64-75). Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency.
23.
Korsgaard, C. ( 1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
24.
Locke, J. ( 1988). Two treatises of government. Cambridge , England: Cambridge University Press.
25.
MacIntyre, A. ( 1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London, England: Duckworth.
26.
MacLean, D. ( 1983). A moral requirement for energy policies. In D. MacLean & P. G. Brown (Eds.), Energy and the future (pp. 180-196). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
27.
Marris, P. ( 1996). The politics of uncertainty: Attachment in private and public life. London, England: Routledge .
28.
Max-Neef, M. ( 1992). Development and human needs. In P. Ekins & M. Max-Neef (Eds.), Real life economics (pp. 197-214). London, England: Routledge.
29.
Nussbaum, M.C. ( 1990). Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature . Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30.
O’Neill, J. ( 1993). Ecology, policy and politics. London , England: Routledge.
31.
Pellizzoni, L. ( 2004). Responsibility and environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 13, 541-565.
32.
Polanyi, K. ( 1944). The great transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
33.
Robinson, F. ( 1999). Globalizing care: Ethics, feminist theory, and international relations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34.
Rodrigues, J. ( 2004). Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi. Journal of Economic Issues, 38, 189-200.
35.
Steiner, H. ( 1983). The rights of future generations. In D. MacLean & P. G. Brown (Eds.), Energy and the future (pp. 151-165). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
36.
Stern, D. ( 1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
37.
Swaney, J.A. ( 1987). Elements of a neoinstitutional environmental economics . Journal of Economic Issues, 21, 1739-1779.
38.
Todorov, T. ( 1996). Facing the extreme: Moral life in the concentration camps . London, England: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
39.
Weber, A., & Varela, F.J. ( 2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97-125.
40.
Wolin, R. ( 2001). Heidegger’s children: Hannah Arendt, Karl Löwith, Hans Jonas, and Herbert Marcuse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
Young, I.M. ( 2006). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23, 102-130.
