Perpetuating the Technological Ideology: An Ellulian Critique of Feenberg’s Democratized Rationalization

Abstract

Andrew Feenberg, in his book Questioning Technology, offers his theory of “democratized rationalization” as a critical alternative to Jacques Ellul’s essentialist perspective. Feenberg argues that Ellul has confused the tendency toward efficiency in technological discourse with the essence of technology, thereby disallowing for a “positive program” of technological change. This article suggests that Feenberg’s “critical theory of technology” does not accurately portray Ellul’s ideas about technology, which were crafted over 40 books and hundreds of articles, and that a reading of Feenberg from an Ellulian perspective reveals Questioning Technology to be: (a) a trend that Ellul predicted in technological scholarship, (b) an unfavorable trend that does not answer the problems posed by Ellul, and (c) an actual furthering of the “technological ideology” that Ellul carefully described in detail over several decades of research. This article concludes that the current trends toward praising democratization should be revisited in light of this Ellulian analysis.

Keywords

Andrew Feenberg Jacques Ellul critical theory of technology technological ideology technology studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borgmann, A. ( 2002). Response to my readers. Techne, 6, 110-25.

Davison, A. ( 2001). Technology and the contested meaning of sustainability . Albany: State University of New York Press.

Ellul, J. ( 1962). The technological order. Technology and Culture, 3, 394-421.

Ellul, J. ( 1964). The technological society. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

Ellul, J. ( 1965). Propaganda: The formation of men’s attitudes. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

Ellul, J. ( 1989). What I believe (W. G. Bromiley, Trans.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Ellul, J. ( 1990). The technological bluff (W. G. Bromiley, Trans.) Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. (Original work published 1986)

Ellul, J. ( 2003). The "autonomy" of the technological phenomenon. In R. C. Scharff & V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology: The technological condition (pp. 386-397). Malden, MA: Blackwell .

Feenberg, A. ( 1999). Questioning technology. London, England: Routledge.

10.

Feenberg, A. ( 2000). Do we need a critical theory of technology?: Reply to Tyler Veak. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 25, 238-242.

11.

Feenberg, A. ( 2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revised. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

12.

Feenberg, A. ( 2004). Critical theory of technology. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/ctt.htm (Original work published 1991)

13.

Freud, S. ( 1961). Civilization and its discontents. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

14.

Johnson, R.R. ( 1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. New York: State University of New York Press.

15.

Lovekin, D. ( 1991). An introduction to the philosophy of Jacques Ellul. London, England: Associated University Presses.

16.

Noble, D.F. ( 1997). The religion of technology: The divinity of man and the spirit of invention. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

17.

Oudshoorn, N. , & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2005). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

18.

Oudshoorn, N. , Rommes, E. , & Stienstra, M. ( 2004). Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 29, 30-63.

19.

Pinch, T.F. , & Bijker, W.E. ( 2003). The social construction of facts and artifacts. In R. C. Scharff & V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology: The technological condition (pp. 221-232). Malden, MA: Blackwell

20.

Rosen, P. ( 2000). Prejudice against the concrete. Science as Culture, 9, 405-412.

21.

Terlizzese, L.J. ( 2004). Hope in the thought of Jacques Ellul. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

22.

Thomson, I. ( 2000). From the question concerning technology to the quest for a democratic technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, and Feenberg. Inquiry, 43, 203-216.

23.

Veak, T. ( 2000). Whose technology? Whose modernity? Questioning Feenberg’s questioning technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values , 25, 226-237.

24.

Winner, L. ( 1977). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.

25.

Winner, L. ( 1997). Technology today: Utopia or dystopia? Social Research, 64, 989-1017.

26.

Winner, L. ( 2003). Social constructivism: Opening the black box and finding it empty. In R. C. Scharff & V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology: The technological condition (pp. 233-244). Malden, MA: Blackwell.