Aristotle launched Western knowledge on a trajectory toward disciplinarity that continues to this day. But is the knowledge management project that began with Aristotle adequate for the age of Google? Perhaps an undisciplined discourse more evocative of Plato can help us constitute new, more relevant inter- and transdisciplinary forms of knowledge. This article explores the history of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity, arguing for a new, critical form of interdisciplinarity that moves beyond the academy into dialogue with the public and private sectors. Contemporary knowledge production should involve not only a horizontal axis stretching across academia but also a vertical axis where academic research is integrated into contemporary life.
Borgmann, A. (1999). Holding on to reality: The nature of information at the turn of the millennium. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Briggle, A. (2006). The president's council on bioethics: Science, democracy, and the good life. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.
3.
Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
4.
Castells, M. (2000). The information age: Economy, society and culture: Vol. 1. The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
5.
Frodeman, R., & Mitcham, C. (2004). Philosophy of science policy. Philosophy Today [Special supplement].
6.
Fuller, S. (2000). The governance of science: Ideology and the future of the open society. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
7.
Fuller, S., & Collier, J.H. (2004). Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge: A new beginning for science and technology studies (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Original work published 1993)
8.
Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking . New York: Little, Brown.
9.
Guston, D. (2000). Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1954)
11.
Holbrook, J.B. (2005). Assessing the science-society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's second merit review criterion. Technology in Society, 27(4), 437-451.
12.
Høyrup, J. (2000). Human sciences: Reappraising the humanities through history and philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
13.
Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Klein, J.T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice . Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
15.
Klein, J.T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
16.
Klein, J.T. (2005). Humanities, culture, and interdisciplinarity: The changing American academy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
17.
Lightman, A., Sarewitz, D. , & Desser, D. (Eds.). ( 2003). Living with the genie: Essays on technology and the quest for human mastery. Washington, DC: Island Press.
18.
Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Mitcham, C. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics (4 vols.). Detroit, MI: Macmillan.
20.
President's Council on Bioethics. (2003). Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness (Foreword by L. Kass). Washington, DC: Author.
21.
Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Price, D. (1986). Little science, big science . . . and beyond (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
Rescher, N. (1987). Forbidden knowledge and other essays on the philosophy of cognition. Boston: D. Reidel.
24.
Rescher, N. (1999). The limits of science (Rev. ed.). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Original work published 1984)
25.
Rubin, M.R., Huber, M.T., & Taylor, E.L. (1986). The knowledge industry in the United States. Princteon, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Sarewitz, D. (1996). Frontiers of illusion: Science, technology, and the politics of progress. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27.
Sarewtiz, D., Pielke, R. A., Jr., & Byerly, R., Jr. (Eds.). (2000). Prediction: Science, decision making, and the future of nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28.
Shattuck, R. (1996). Forbidden knowledge: From Prometheus to pornography . New York: St. Martin's.
