The technoscientific consequences of both the human drives for glory on the one hand and a comfortable life on the other potentially threaten human existence. R.U.R., a science fiction play by Karel Čapek, bridges ancient writers and contemporary technoscientific endeavors, encouraging us to consider these issues in light of persistent human nature.
Aristotle. (1998). The metaphysics (H. Lawson-Tancred, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.
3.
Bacon, F. ( 1974). The advancement of learning. In A. Johnston (Ed.), The advancement of learning and new Atlantis (pp. 3-212). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
4.
Bacon, F. ( 1989). The great instauration. In J. Weinberger (Ed.), New Atlantis and the great instauration (Rev. ed., pp. 1-32). Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson.
5.
Bauman, Z. ( 1989). Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge , England: Polity Press.
6.
Čapek, K. ( 2004). R. U. R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots) (C. Novak, Trans., with an introduction by I. Klíma). New York, NY: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1920)
7.
Couvalis, G. ( 1997). The philosophy of science: science and objectivity. England , London: SAGE.
8.
Fukuyama, F. ( 2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York, NY: Picador .
9.
Hanna, J.F. ( 2004). The scope and limits of scientific objectivity. Philosophy of Science, 71, 339-361.
10.
Hesiod. (1993). Works and days and Theogony (S. Lombardo, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
11.
Homer. (1990). The iliad (R. Fagles, Trans.). New York, NY: Penguin Classics .
12.
Homer. (1996). The odyssey (R. Fagles, Trans.). New York: Penguin Classics .
13.
Kass, L.R. ( 1985). Toward a more natural science: Biology and human affairs . New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
King, K.C. ( 1987). Achilles: Paradigms of the war hero from Homer to the Middle Ages. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Klima, I. ( 2002). Karl Čapek: Life and work (N. Comrada, Trans.). Highland Park, NJ: Catbird Press .
16.
Klíma, I. ( 2004). Introduction. In R. U. R (Rossum’s Universal Robots) (C. Novak, Trans.; pp. vii-xxv). London, England: Penguin.
17.
Lewis, C.S. ( 1974). The abolition of man. San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins.
18.
Machiavelli, N. ( 1998). The prince (H. C. Mansfield, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Medawar, P. ( 1991). The threat and the glory: Reflections on science and scientists. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
Nagel, E. ( 1967). The nature and aim of science. In S. Morgenbesser (Ed.), Philosophy of science today (pp. 3-13). New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
Palmer, M. ( 1982). Love of glory and the common good. American Political Science Review, 76, 825-836.
22.
Plutarch. (1972). Gaius Marius and Sulla. In Fall of the Roman Republic (R. Warner, Trans. with an Introduction by R. Saeger). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
23.
Popper, K.R. ( 1950). The open society and its enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Redfield, J.M. ( 1975). Nature and culture in the Iliad: The tragedy of Hector . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Rykiel, E.J., Jr. ( 2001). Scientific objectivity, value systems, and policymaking . Bioscience, 51, 433-436.
26.
Sassower, R. ( 1997). Technoscientific angst: Ethics + responsibility. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
Scott, W.T. ( 1983). Michael Polanyi’s creativity in chemistry. In R. Aris, H. T. Davis, & R. H. Stuewer (Eds.), Springs of scientific creativity: Essays on founders of modern science (pp. 279-307). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
28.
Schein, S.L. ( 1984). The mortal hero: An introduction to Homer’s Iliad . Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Shattuck, R. ( 1996). Forbidden knowledge: From Prometheus to pornography. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
30.
Smith, A.K., & Weiner, C. ( 1980). Robert Oppenheimer: Letters and recollections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
