Mainstream science, technology, and society scholars have shown little interest in engineering ethics, one going so far as to label engineering ethics activists as “shit shovelers.” Detachment from engineering ethics on the part of most STS scholars is related to a broader and long-standing split between the scholar-oriented and activist-oriented wings of STS. This article discusses the various STS “subcultures” and argues that the much-maligned activist STS subculture is far more likely than the mainstream scholar subculture to have a significant impact on engineering ethics education and practice.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2005). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Available at http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/%20Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2006-07%20EAC%20Criteria%%20205-25-06-06.pdf
2.
Allenby, B. (2004). Engineering and ethics for an anthropogenic planet. In National Academy of Engineering (Ed.), Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering (pp. 9-28). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
3.
American Association of Engineering Societies, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, ASME International-Environmental Engineering Division, National Academy of Engineering, & National Society of Professional Engineers. (2001). A declaration by the US engineering community to the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Available at www.asme.org/News%20PublicPolicy/GovRelations/PositionStatements?Declaration_%20by_US_Community.cfm
4.
Cutcliffe, S. (2000). Ideas, machines, and values. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
Davis, M. (1996, April). Defining “engineer”: How to do it and why it matters. Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 97-101.
6.
Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an engineer. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Davis, M. (1999). Teaching ethics across the engineering curriculum. Online Proceedings of International Conference on Ethics in Engineering and Computer Science, 21-24 March 1999. Cleveland, OH: Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science. Available at http://onlineethics.org/essays/%20education/davis.html
8.
Davis, M. (2003). What's philosophically interesting about engineering ethics?Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 353-361.
9.
Fuller, S. (1992). STS as a social movement: On the purpose of graduate programs. Science, Technology & Society, 91(Oct), 1-5.
10.
Gorman, M., Hertz, M., Louis, G., Magpili, L., Mauss, M., Mehalik, M., et al. (2000). Integrating ethics & engineering: A graduate option in systems engineering, ethics, and technology studies. Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 464-469.
11.
Hakken, D. (1994a). Online archive of sci-tech-studies listserv. Available at http://cctr.umkc.edu/ftp/anon_ftp/LIST_ARCHIVES/%20STS/STS94/STS1094 (message date October 25).
12.
Hakken, D. (1994b). Online archive of sci-tech-studies listserv. Available at http://cctr.umkc.edu/ftp/anon_ftp/LIST_ARCHIVES/%20STS/STS94/STS1194 (message date November 1).
13.
Harris, C. Jr., Pritchard, M., & Rabins, M. (2000). Engineering ethics(2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14.
Herkert, J. (1994). Online archive of sci-tech-studies listser. Available at http://cctr.umkc.edu/ftp/anon_ftp/LIST_ARCHIVES/%20STS/STS94/STS1094 (message date October 28).
15.
Herkert, J. R. (2000a). Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy, and curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 303-313.
16.
Herkert, J. R. (2000b). Social, ethical, and policy implications of engineering. New York: John Wiley/IEEE Press.
17.
Herkert, J. R. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 403-414.
18.
Herkert J. R. (2004). Microethics, macroethics, and professional engineering societies. In National Academy of Engineering (Ed.), Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering(pp. 107-114). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
19.
Kline, R. (2001). Using history and sociology to teach engineering ethics. IEEE Technology and Society, 20(4), 13-20.
20.
Kline, R. (2004). Research ethics, engineering ethics, and science and technology studies. Available at http://bovay.ece.%20cornell.edu/sts-ethics-paper-kline
21.
Ladd, J. (1980). The quest for a code of professional ethics: An intellectual and moral confusion. In R. Chalk, M. S. Frankel, & S. B. Chafer (Eds.), AAAS Professional Ethics Project: Professional ethics activities in the scientific and engineering societies(pp. 154-159). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
22.
Lynch, W. T., & Kline, R. (2000). Engineering practice and engineering ethics.Science, Technology and Human Values, 2, 195-225.
23.
Martin, M., & Schinzinger, R. (1996). Ethics in engineering(3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
National Academy of Engineering. (2004) Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
25.
O'Connell, B., & Herkert, J. R. (2004). Engineering ethics and computer ethics: Twins separated at birth?Techné, 8, 36-56.
26.
Rabins, M. (1998). Teaching engineering ethics to undergraduates: Why? what? how?Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 291-302.
27.
Steneck, N. (1999). Designing teaching and assessment tools for an integrated engineering ethics curriculum. In Proceedings of 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference(Session 12d6, pp. 11-17). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
28.
Unger, S. (1994). Controlling technology: Ethics and the responsible engineer (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
29.
Unger, S. (1999). The assault on IEEE ethics support. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 18(1), 36–40.
30.
Vesilind, P. A., & Gunn, A. S. (1998). Sustainable development and the ASCE code of ethics. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice ASCE, 124(3), 72-74.
31.
Winner, L. (1990). Engineering ethics and political imagination. In P. Durbin (Ed.), Broad and narrow interpretations of philosophy of technology(pp. 53-64). Boston: Kluwer.
32.
Woodhouse, E., Hess, D., Breyman, S., & Martin, B. (2002). Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science, 32, 297-319.
33.
Woodhouse, E. J. (2001). Overconsumption as a challenge for ethically responsible engineering. IEEE Technology and Society, 20(3), 23-30.
34.
Zandvoort, H., van de Poel, I., & Brumsen, M. (2000). Ethics in the engineering curricula: Topics, trends and challenges for the future. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 291-302.
