An energy efficiency scenario (Joint Institute for a Sustainable Energy and Environmental Future) demonstrates that an energy future built on the use of cost-effective, high-efficiency technologies is clearly within the grasp of South Korea and would justify a nuclear power moratorium with significantly lower carbon dioxide emissions. This is a promising result, especially because applications of other sustainable energy options, such as renewables, decentralized technologies, material recycling/reuse, ecologically based land use planning, forest conservation, sustainable agriculture, and redirection of economic development toward an environment-friendly industrial base, are not included in the analysis. Here lies one of the most fundamental policy choices of the newcentury: Will we build a sustainable energy and environmental future, or will we send forward the burdens and risks of a policy regime that is unwilling to value the future beyond the satisfaction of short-term interests and convenience? It is a critical time for South Korean policy making.
Asia-Pacific Energy Research Centre
. (1998). APEC energy demand and supply outlook. Tokyo, Japan: Institute of Energy Economics.
2.
Byrne, J.
, Wang, Y-D., Lee, H., & Kim, J-d. (1998). An equity- and sustainability-based policy response to global climate change. Energy Policy, 26(4), 335-343.
3.
Citizens’Alliance to Save the Atmosphere and Earth
. (1997). Recommended strategies for the mitigation of CO2 emissions: Phase I. Tokyo, Japan: Author.
4.
Edmonds, J.
, Scott, M. J., Roop, J. M., & MacCracken, C. N. (1999, December). International emissions trading & global climate change: Impacts on the costs of greenhouse gas mitigation. Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
5.
Energy Innovations
. (1997). Energy innovations: A prosperous path to a clean environment. Washington, DC: Alliance to Save Energy, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Natural Resources Defense Council, Tellus Institute, and Union of Concerned Scientists.
6.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
. (1990). Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment (J. T. Houghton, G.J. Jenkins, & J. J. Ephraums, Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
. (1996). Climate change 1995: The science of climate change, contribution of Working Group II to the 2nd assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
. (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis (J. T. Houghton et al., Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Interlaboratory Working Group. (1998). Scenarios of U.S. carbon reductions: Potential impacts of energy-efficient and low-carbon technologies by 2010 and beyond. Prepared by staff from five U.S. Department of Energy national Laboratories: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
10.
Interlaboratory Working Group. (2000). Scenarios for a clean energy future. Prepared for Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Prepared by staff from five DOE national Laboratories: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
11.
Korea Electric Power Corporation
. (1997a). Electric audit and DSM potential survey of (Korea’s) large buildings. Seoul, Korea: Author.
12.
Korea Electric Power Corporation
. (1997b). Statistics of electricity generation. Seoul, Korea: Author.
13.
Korea Electric Power Corporation
. (1997c). White paper on nuclear energy. Seoul, Korea: Author.
14.
Korea Electric Power Corporation
. (1999). Statistics of electricity generation. Seoul, Korea: Author.
15.
Korea Energy Economics Institute
. (1997). Financial crisis and the energy industry.
16.
Korea Energy Economics Institute
. (1998a). GHG mitigation strategies in energy and industrial sectors.
17.
Korea Energy Economics Institute
. (1998b). Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials and costs for Korea.
18.
Korea Energy Economics Institute
. (1999a). Energy statistics information system. Retrieved fromhttp://www.keei.re.kr
19.
Korea Energy Economics Institute
. (1999b). Greenhouse gas emission forecast for the energy and industrial sectors.
20.
Korea Energy Economics Institute
. (2000). Energy statistics information system. Retrieved fromhttp://her.keei.re.kr:3081
21.
Korea Energy Management Corporation
. (1997a). Energy analysis for KEMCO-designated commercial and industrial entities.
22.
Korea Energy Management Corporation
. (1997b). Handbook of (Korean) energy conservation.
23.
Korea Energy Management Corporation
. (1997c). KEMCO annual report.
24.
Korea Institute of Construction Technology
. (1999). Mid- and long-term energy conservation strategies in buildings for the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change.
25.
Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade
. (1998). Framework convention on climate change and industrial structural change.
26.
Ministry of Commerce
, Industry and Energy. (1998, January). 4th long-term electricity supply plan..
27.
Ministry of Commerce
, Industry and Energy. (2000, January). 5th long-term electricity supply plan. Retrieved from http://www.mocie.go.kr./
28.
Ministry of Commerce
, Industry and Energy and Korea Energy Economics Institute. (1998, December). The second-year study of planning national actions for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
29.
Ministry of Commerce
, Industry and Energy and Korea Energy Economics Institute. (1999, December). The third-year study of planning national actions for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
30.
Ministry of Commerce
, Industry and Energy and Korea Energy Economics Institute. (2000). 2000 yearbook of energy statistics.
31.
Pew Center
. (1999, October). Developing countries & global climate change: Electric power options in Korea. Prepared by JinGyu Oh and Jeffrey Logan et al.
32.
World Bank
. (1999). World development report: Knowledge for development. New York: Oxford University Press.
