It is argued that contemporary civilization may be distinguished by the fact that its technology-based connectedness is fast displacing its culture-based connectedness. This article examines the ramifications of this phenomenon from the perspective of sustainability in general and its implications for our “energy systems” in particular. The diagnosis is followed by policy suggestions that would make energy use not only more sustainable but also bring it in line with human values and aspirations.
Altieri, M. (2001). Genetically engineered crops: Separating the myths from the reality. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 21(2), 129-148.
2.
Chapman, P. (1975). Fuel’s paradise: Energy options for Britain. New York: Penguin.
3.
Cobb, C. F., Halstead, T., & Rowe, J. (1995, October). If the GDP is up, why is America down?Atlantic Monthly, 276, 58-78.
4.
Conservation Commission of the World Energy Conference. (1978). World energy: Looking ahead to 2020. Guildford, UK: IPC Science and Technology Press.
5.
Conservation Commission of the World Energy Conference. (1983). Energy, 2000-2020: World prospects and regional stresses. London: Graham and Trotman.
6.
Daly, H. E., & Cobb, C. F., Jr. (1989). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon.
7.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Knopf.
8.
Ellul, J. (1978). Symbolic function, technology and society. Journal of Sociological and Biological Structures, 1, 207-218.
9.
Ellul, J. (1980). The technological system. New York: Continuum.
10.
Ellul, J. (2001). Remarks on technology and art. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 21(1), 26-37.
11.
Ford Foundation Energy Policy Project. (1974). A time to choose: America’s energy future. Final report. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12.
Freeman, N. B. (1996). The politics of power: Ontario Hydro and its government. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
13.
Geller, H. S. (1989). Implementing electricity conservation programs: Progress towards least-cost energy services among US utilities. In T. Johansson, B. Bodlund, & R. Williams (Eds.), Electricity: Efficient end-use and new generation technologies, and their planning implications (pp. 741-758). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
14.
Goldemberg, J., Johansson, T., Reddy, A., & Williams, R. (1988). Energy for a sustainable world. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: Harper.
16.
Hill, R., O’Keefe, P., & Snape, C. (1995). The future of energy use. London: Earthscan.
17.
Hubbert, M. K. (1971). The energy resources of the earth. Scientific American, 224, 70-70.
18.
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. (1981). Energy in a finite world: Report by the Energy Systems Program Group. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
19.
Jacobs, M. (1993). The green economy: The environment, sustainable development and the politics of the future. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
20.
Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Kreith, F. (1993, June). Integrated resource planning. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 115, 80-80.
22.
Kunstler, J. H. (1993). The geography of nowhere. New York: Touchstone.
23.
Leach, G. (1976). Energy and food production. Guildford, UK: IPC Science and Technology Press.
24.
Leach, G. (1992, February). The energy transition. Energy Policy, 22, 116-123.
25.
Lovins, A. B. (1973). World energy strategies. Boulder, CO: Earth Resources Research.
26.
Lovins, A. B. (1975). Soft energy paths: Toward a durable peace. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
27.
Lovins, A. B. (1992). The negawatt revolution: New developments in energy efficiency. In B. Abeles, A. J. Jacobson, & P. Sheng (Eds.), Energy and the environment (pp. 2-34). New Brunswick, NJ: World Scientific.
28.
Patterson, W. C. (1990). The energy alternative: Changing the way the world works. London: Boxtree.
29.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.
30.
Rampton, S., & Stauber, J. (2001). Trust us we’re experts: How industry manipulates science and gambles with your future.New York: J. P. Tarcher.
31.
Schumacher, E. F. (1982). Schumacher on energy: Speeches and writings of E. F. Schumacher. London: Cape.
32.
Schweitzer, M., Hirst, E., & Yourstone, E. (1990). The process of integrated resource planning for electric utilities. In ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings (pp. 219-226). Pacific Grove, CA: ACEEE.
33.
U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. (1974). Nuclear power growth,1974-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999). Mental health: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: Author.
35.
Vanderburg, W. H. (2000). The labyrinth of technology. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
36.
Vanderburg, W. H. (2001a). Comments on the empire of nonsense: Art in a technique-dominated society. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 21(1), 38-54.
37.
Vanderburg, W. H. (2001b). Living in the labyrinth of technology. Unpublished manuscript.
38.
von Weizsäcker, E., Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (1997). Factor four: Doubling wealth—Halving resource use: The new report to the Club of Rome. London: Earthscan.
39.
Workshop on Alternative Energy Strategies. (1977). Energy: Global prospects, 1985-2000. New York: McGraw-Hill.
