The tenure system exists in most public and private universities and 4-year public colleges in the United States. The American Association of University Professors has argued that tenure provides the most reliable means of assuring academic freedom, faculty quality, and educational excellence. However, budgetary constraints and the end of mandatory retirement in the ’90s have resulted in questioning the merits of the tenure system. It is argued that tenure entrenches a lazy professoriate, encourages the creation of temporary faculty positions, and supports research over teaching. This article examines the tenure system as practiced in engineering institutions in the United States because engineering faculty serve as an interesting case study of 21st-century technology and 19th-century values. It illuminates issues underlying the tenure system beyond the traditional justification of academic freedom.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2000). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore: Author.
3.
American Association of University Professors. (1995). AAUP policy documents and reports. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
American Association of University Professors. (2000, October). Censured administrations. Academe, 86, 89-89.
5.
Anderson, A. (1992). Imposters in the temple. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
Bentley, R. J., & Blackburn, R. T. (1992). Two decades of gains for female faculty?Teachers College Record, 93, 697-709.
7.
Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind: How higher education has failed democracy and impoverished the souls of today’s students. New York: Simon & Schuster.
9.
Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member: Supporting and fostering professional development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Chubin, D., E., & Hackett, E. (1990). Peerless science: Peer review and US science policy. Albany: State University of New York at Albany Press.
11.
Cohen, W. (2000, January). Taking care of business. Prism, 19-19.
12.
Conant, J. B. (1970). My several lives: Memoirs of a social inventor. New York: Harper & Row.
13.
De George, R. T. (1997). Academic freedom and tenure: Ethical issues. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
Dewey, J. (1902). Academic freedom. Educational Review, 23, 1-14.
15.
Editorial. (1995, January 11). Tenure under pressure. Washington Post, p. A16-A16.
16.
Finkin, M. W. (1996). The case for tenure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
Finn, M. G., & Baker, J. G. (1993). Future jobs in natural science and engineering: Shortage or surplus. Monthly Labor Review, 116, 54-61.
18.
Franke, A. H. (2000, August 11). Why battle over tenure should-n’t end up in the courtroom. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B6-B6.
19.
Freeman, P., & Aspray, W. (1999). The supply of information technology workers. Washington, DC: Computing Research Association.
20.
Fuchs, R. F. (1963). Academic freedom—Its basic philosophy, function, and history. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28, 136-152.
21.
Hacker, S. (1990). “Doing it the hard way”: Investigations of gender and technology. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
22.
Healy, P. (1997, November 14). Mass higher education leader to seek abolition of tenure. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A36-A36.
23.
Holden, C. (1997, April 4). Tenure turmoil sparks reforms. Science, 276, 24-26.
24.
Huer, J. (1991). Tenure for Socrates: A study in the betrayal of theAmerican professor. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
25.
Joy, B. (2000). Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired, 8, 238-246.
26.
Kimball, R. (1990). Tenured radicals: How politics has corrupted our higher education. New York: Harper & Row.
27.
Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
28.
Livingston, J. C. (1973). Tenure everyone. In B. L. Smith (Ed.), The tenure debate (pp. 54-73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
29.
Magner, D. K. (1997, June 20). A fierce battle over tenure at U. of Minnesota comes to a quiet close. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A14-A14.
30.
McGee, R. W., & Block, W. E. (1997). Academic tenure: An economic critique. In R. T. De George (Ed.), Academic freedom and tenure: Ethical issues (pp. 156-175). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
31.
Mcllwee, J. S., & Robinson, G. J. (1992). Women in engineering: Gender, power and workplace culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
33.
Metzger, W. P. (1973). Academic tenure in America: A historical essay. In W. R. Keast & J. W. Macy (Eds.), Faculty tenure(pp. 93-159). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Mooney, C. J. (1993, January 13). Tenured faculty members are spared in latest round of belt tightening. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A17-A17.
35.
National Science Foundation. (1998). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: Author.
36.
National Science Foundation. (2000). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: Author.
37.
Noble, D. (1998). Digital diplomas mills: The coming battle over online instruction. Sociological Perspectives, 41, 815-825.
38.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accident. New York: Basic Books.
39.
Rees, A., & Smith, S. P. (1991). Faculty retirement in the arts and sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
40.
Rhoades, G. (1998). Managed professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring higher education. Albany: State University of New York at Albany Press.
41.
Schrecker, E. W. (1986). No ivory tower: McCarthyism and the universities. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Shils, E. (1993). Do we still need academic freedom?Minerva, 32, 79-98.
43.
Shils, E. (1995). Academic freedom and permanent tenure. Minerva, 33, 5-17.
44.
Skocpol, T. (1980). States and social revolutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (1996). The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21, 303-339.
47.
Sykes, C. J. (1988). Profscam: Professors and the demise of higher education. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.
48.
Thompson, K. (1996). Alchemy in the academy. In C. Nelson (Ed.), Will teach for food: Academic labor in crisis (pp. 278-290). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
49.
Tully, S. (1995, May). Finally colleges start to cut their crazy costs. Fortune Magazine, 110-114.
50.
Varma, R. (1995). Restructuring corporate R&D: From autonomous to linkage model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7, 231-247.
51.
Varma, R. (1999). Professional autonomy vs. industrial control?Science as Culture, 8, 23-45.
52.
Varma, R. (2000a). Changing research cultures in the U.S. industry. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25, 395-416.
53.
Varma, R. (2000b). Technology and ethics for engineering students. Bulletin of Science, Technology, & Society, 20, 217-223.
54.
Yasuda, G. (1994, May 31). Regents board member seeks to abolish tenure. Orlando Sentinel, p. B1-B1.
