Like drug addiction, pathological gambling (PG) has been associated with impairments in executive functions and alterations in dopaminergic functioning; however, the role of dopamine (DA) in the executive profile of PG remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify whether the DRD2/ANKK1 Taq1A-rs1800497 and the DAT1-40 bp VNTR polymorphisms are associated with cognitive flexibility (measured by Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Trail Making Test (TMT)) and inhibition response (measured by Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT)), in a clinical sample of 69 PG patients. Our results showed an association between DA functioning and cognitive flexibility performance. The Taq1A A1+ (A1A2/A1A1) genotype was associated with poorer TMT performance (p < 0.05), while DAT1 9-repeat homozygotes displayed better WCST performance (p < 0.05) than either 10-repeat homozygotes or heterozygotes. We did not find any association between the DRD2 or DAT1 polymorphisms and the inhibition response. These results suggested that pathological gamblers with genetic predispositions toward lower availability of DA and D2 receptor density are at a higher risk of cognitive flexibility difficulties. Future studies should aim to shed more light on the genetic mechanisms underlying the executive profile in PG.
Alvarez-MoyaEMOchoaCJimenez-MurciaS. (2011) Effect of executive functioning, decision-making and self-reported impulsivity on the treatment outcome of pathologic gambling. J Psychiatry Neurosci36: 165–175.
2.
American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2000) DSM-IV-TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: APA.
3.
BannonMJRothRH (1983) Pharmacology of mesocortical dopamine neurons. Pharmacol Rev35: 53–68.
4.
BannonMJMichelhaughSKWangJ. (2001) The human dopamine transporter gene: Gene organization, transcriptional regulation and potential involvement in neuropsychiatric disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol11: 449–455.
5.
Bartrés-FazDJunquéCSerra-GrabulosaJM. (2002) Dopamine DRD2 Taq I polymorphism associates with caudate nucleus volume and cognitive performance in memory impaired subjects. Neuroreport13: 1121–1125.
6.
BoltonJLMarioniREDearyIJ. (2010) Association between polymorphisms of the dopamine receptor D2 and catechol-o-methyl-transferase genes and cognitive function. Behav Genet40: 630–638.
7.
BraetWJohnsonKATobinCT. (2011) fMRI activation during response inhibition and error processing: The role of the DAT1 gene in typically developing adolescents and those diagnosed with ADHD. Neuropsychologia49: 1641–1650.
8.
BrehmerYWesterbergHBellanderM. (2009) Working memory plasticity modulated by dopamine transporter genotype. Neurosci Lett467: 117–120.
9.
CongdonECanliT (2008) A neurogenetic approach to impulsivity. J Pers76: 1447–1484.
10.
CoolsRD’EspositoM (2011) Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control. Biol Psychiatry69 (12): e113–125.
11.
CropleyVLFujitaMInnisRB. (2006) Molecular imaging of the dopaminergic system and its association with human cognitive function. Biol Psychiatry59: 898–907.
12.
EisenbergDTCampbellBMackillopJ. (2007) Season of birth and dopamine receptor gene associations with impulsivity, sensation seeking and reproductive behaviors. PLoS One2: e1216–e1225.
13.
EnochMAGoldmanD (2001).The genetics of alcoholism and alcohol abuse. Curr Psychiatry Rep3: 144–151.
14.
FlorescoSBMagyarO (2006). Mesocortical dopamine modulation of executive functions: Beyond working memory. Psychopharmacology188: 567–585.
15.
FlorescoSBMagyarOGhods-SharifiS. (2006) Multiple dopamine receptor subtypes in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat regulate set-shifting. Neuropsychopharmacology31: 297–309.
16.
FrankMJFossellaJA (2011) Neurogenetics and pharmacology of learning, motivation and cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology36: 133–152.
17.
GligorovicMBuhaN (2013) Conceptual abilities of children with mild intellectual disability: Analysis of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance. J Intellect Dev Disabil38: 134–140.
18.
GoldenCJ (1978) Stroop Color and Word Test: Manual for Clinical and Experimental Uses. Chicago: Stoeling.
19.
GordonEMDevaneyJMBeanS. (2013) Resting-state striato-frontal functional connectivity is sensitive to DAT1 genotype and predicts executive function. Cereb Cortex Epub ahead of print 22August. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht229.
20.
GoudriaanAEOosterlaanJDe BeursE. (2006) Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: A comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction101: 534–547.
21.
HackLMKalsiGAlievF. (2011) Limited associations of dopamine system genes with alcohol dependence and related traits in the Irish Affected Sib Pair Study of Alcohol Dependence (IASPSAD). Alcohol Clin Exp Res35: 376–385.
HollingsheadAB (1975) Four-factor Index of Social Status. New Haven, CT: Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, Department of Sociology.
24.
HsiehPCYehTLLeeIH. (2010) Correlation between errors on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the availability of striatal dopamine transporters in healthy volunteers. J Psychiatry Neurosci35: 90–94.
25.
HymanSEMalenkaRCNestlerEJ (2006). Neural mechanisms of addiction: The role of reward-related learning and memory. Annu Rev Neurosci29: 565–598.
JoutsaJJohanssonJNiemeläS. (2012) Mesolimbic dopamine release is linked to symptom severity in pathological gambling. Neuroimage60: 1992–1999.
28.
KemppainenNLaineMLaaksoMP. (2003) Hippocampal dopamine D2 receptors correlate with memory functions in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurosci18: 149–154.
29.
KleinTANeumannJReuterM. (2007) Genetically-determined differences in learning from errors. Science318: 1642–1645.
30.
KrugelLKBieleGMohrPN. (2009) Genetic variation in dopaminergic neuromodulation influences the ability to rapidly and flexibly adapt decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA106: 17951–17956.
31.
LawrenceAJLutyJBogdanNA. (2009) Problem gamblers share deficits in impulsive decision-making with alcohol-dependent individuals. Addiction104: 1006–1015.
32.
LeberATurk-BrowneNChunM (2008) Neural predictors of moment-to-moment fluctuations in cognitive flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA105: 13592–13597.
33.
LesieurHRBlumeSB (1987) The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry144: 1184–1148.
34.
LooSKSpecterESmolenA. (2003) Functional effects of the DAT1 polymorphism on EEG measures in ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry42: 986–993.
35.
MarkettSMontagCWalterNT. (2011) On the molecular genetics of flexibility: The case of task-switching, inhibitory control and genetic variants. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci11: 644–651.
36.
MattayVSGoldbergTEFeraF. (2003) Catechol-O-methyl-transferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA100: 6186–6191.
37.
MehtaMAManesFFMagnolfiG. (2004) Impaired set-shifting and dissociable effects on tests of spatial working memory following the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride in human volunteers. Psychopharmacology176: 331–342.
38.
MeyerGSchwertfegerJExtonMS. (2004) Neuroendocrine response to casino gambling in problem gamblers. Psychoneuroendocrinology29: 1272–1280.
39.
MillJAshersonPBrowesC. (2002) Expression of the dopamine transporter gene is regulated by the 3’ UTR VNTR: Evidence from brain and lymphocytes using quantitative RT-PCR. Am J Med Genet114: 975–979.
40.
MoisesHWFrieboesRMSpelzhausP. (2001) No association between dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2) and human intelligence. J Neural Transm108: 115–121.
41.
MontagCHartmannPMerzM. (2008) D2 receptor density and prepulse inhibition in humans: Negative findings from a molecular genetic approach. Behav Brain Res187: 428–432.
42.
NevilleMJJohnstoneECWaltonRT (2004) Identification and characterization of ANKK1: A novel kinase gene closely linked to DRD2 on chromosome band 11q23.1. Hum Mutat23: 540–545.
43.
NobleEP (2000) Addiction and its reward process through polymorphisms of the D2 dopamine receptor gene: A review. Eur Psychiatry15: 79–89.
44.
NobleEP (2003) D2 dopamine receptor gene in psychiatric and neurologic disorders and its phenotypes. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet116B: 103–125.
45.
NyhusEBarcelóF (2009) The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the cognitive assessment of prefrontal executive functions: A critical update. Brain Cogn71: 437–451.
46.
PrakashOAvasthiABenegalV (2012) Should pathological gambling be considered an addictive disorder?Asian J Psychiatr5: 211–214.
47.
ReitanRM (1958) The validity of the Trail-Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Motor Skills8: 271–276.
48.
ReuterMPetersKSchroeterK. (2005) The influence of the dopaminergic system on cognitive functioning: A molecular genetic approach. Behav Brain Res164: 93–99.
49.
RitchieTNobleEP (2003) Association of seven polymorphisms of the D2 dopamine receptor gene with brain receptor-binding characteristics. Neurochem Res28: 73–82.
50.
SavitzJSolmsMRamesarR (2006) The molecular genetics of cognition: Dopamine, COMT and BDNF. Genes Brain Behav5: 311–328.
StelzelCBastenUMontagC. (2010) Frontostriatal involvement in task switching depends on genetic differences in d2 receptor density. J Neurosci30: 14205–14212.
53.
StussDTAlexanderMP (2000) Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A conceptual view. Psychol Res63: 289–298.
54.
TsaiSJYuYWLinCH. (2002) Dopamine D2 receptor and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 2B subunit: genetic variants and intelligence. Neuropsychobiology45: 128–130.
55.
WechslerD (1997) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Third edition administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX; Psychological Corporation.
56.
WhiteMJMorrisCPLawfordBR. (2008) Behavioral phenotypes of impulsivity related to the ANKK1 gene are independent of an acute stressor. Behav Brain Funct4: 54–62.
57.
WohlMBoniCAschM. (2008) Lack of association of the dopamine transporter gene in a French ADHD sample. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet147: 1509–1510.
58.
ZackMPoulosCX (2009) Parallel roles for dopamine in pathological gambling and psychostimulant addiction. Curr Drug Abuse Rev2: 11–25.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
