Migrant worker victimisation: EU labour migration law and structural injustice

Abstract

Criminal justice responses to migrant worker exploitation are insufficient. The deficiency can be overcome by a shift towards a perspective that goes beyond criminal law and embodies a response that expands the guarantee of victims’ rights to include social and labour rights protection. In the European Union (EU), the protection of migrant workers’ rights and entitlements – including those related to access to justice when faced with victimisation – depends on the migration status they are granted, due to a piecemeal and fragmented approach to labour migration. This article maps the EU legal migration framework from the theoretical standpoint of Mantouvalou’s state-mediated structural injustice. The weaknesses stemming from the current law and policy framework that create migrant worker legal precarity and fail to guarantee access to justice where workers experience exploitative working conditions will be identified. The article further develops a clearer picture of the rights of victims on the ‘margins of protection’ who, by virtue of their legal status, do not ‘fit’ into the European criminal law instruments that seek to tackle exploitation and victimisation and offers insights into how the EU should continue to strengthen the protection of the social rights of migrant workers.

Keywords

labour exploitation criminal justice structural injustice labour migration migrant workers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allain

(2019) Conceptualizing the exploitation of human trafficking. In: Bryson Clark

Poucki

(eds) The Sage Handbook of Human Trafficking and Modern Day Slavery. Sage, pp.3–17.

Barnard

Butlin

(2020) The rule of law and access to the courts for EU migrants. Journal of Common Market Studies 58(6): 1621–1634.

Berntsen

De Lange

(2018) Employer sanctions: Instrument of labour market regulation, migration control, and worker protection? In: De Lange

Rijken

(eds) Towards a Decent Labour Market for Low-Waged Migrant Workers. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.207–230.

Borelli

(2024) Labour intermediaries and labour migration in the EU – A framing puzzle to rule the market (and avoid the market of rules) (FES Briefing October 2024). Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/bruessel/21726.pdf (accessed 5 March 2025).

Bregiannis

(2021) An analysis of the EU seasonal workers directive in the light of two similar regimes: Three dimensions of regulated inequality. European Labour Law Journal 12(3): 266–279.

Collins

(2024) Segmented labour markets, structural injustice and legal remedies. In: Mantouvalou

Wolff

(eds) Structural Injustice and the Law. University College London Press, pp.105–128.

Collins

(2020) Exploitation at work. Beyond a ‘criminalisation’ or ‘regulatory alternatives’ dichotomy. In: Bogg

Collins

Freedland

, et al. (eds) Criminality at Work. Oxford University Press, pp. 97–115.

Countouris

(2024) Effective labour rights in the EU: Towards a fair enforcement ecosystem. European Labour Law Journal 15(4): 641–656.

Davies

(2019) From severe to routine labour exploitation: The case of migrant workers in the UK food industry. Criminology and Criminal Justice 19(3): 294–310.

10.

De Lange

Falkenhain

(2024) Precarity prevented or reinforced? Migrants’ right to change employers in the recast of the EU Single Permit Directive. Frontiers in Sociology 8: 1267235.

11.

Deveaux

Pantich

(2017) Introduction. In: Deveaux

Pantich

(eds) Exploitation: From Practice to Theory. Rowman and Littlefield, pp.1–11.

12.

Eurochild (2024) The revision of the EU victims’ rights directive: An opportunity to strengthen the rights of child victims. Available at: https://eurochild.org/news/the-revision-of-the-eu-victims-rights-directive-an-opportunity-to-strengthen-the-rights-of-child-victims/ (accessed 20 May 2025).

13.

European Commission (2020) Communication from the Commission on a New Pact on Migration and Asylum. European Commission.

14.

European Commission (2022) Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Report Accompanying the Document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Application Procedure for a Single Permit for Third-Country Nationals to Reside and Work in the Territory of a Member State and on a Common Set of Rights for Third-Country Workers Legally Residing in a Member State (recast). European Commission.

15.

European Parliament (2024) Report on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/29/EU Establishing Minimum Standards on the Rights, Support and Protection of Victims of Crime, and Replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. European Commission.

16.

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2021) Protecting Migrants in an Irregular Situation From Labour Exploitation – Role of the Employer Sanctions Directive.

17.

Fudge

Herzfeld Olsson

(2014) The EU seasonal workers directive: When immigration controls meet labour rights. European Journal of Migration and Law 16: 439–466.

18.

Ganty

(2021) Integration duties in the European Union: Four models. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 28(6): 784–804.

19.

Haapasaari

Davis

Lietonen

, et al. (2024) ‘From rights on paper to rights in action’ – Exploited migrant workers’ access to remedy in the Baltic Sea Region. HEUNI report series no.109. HEUNI.

20.

Hastie

(2017) The inaccessibility of justice for migrant workers: A capabilities perspective. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice Recueil annuel de Windsor d’accès à la justice 34(2): 20–39.

21.

ILO (2022) Global Estimates of Modern Slavery: Forced Labour and Forced Marriage. ILO.

22.

Jovanovic

(2020) The essence of slavery: Exploitation in human rights law. Human Rights Law Review 20(4): 674–703.

23.

Letsas

(2024) Structural injustice and the law: A philosophical framework. In: Mantouvalou

Wolff

(eds) Structural Injustice and the Law. University College London Press, pp.59–81.

24.

McKeown

(2017) Sweatshop labour as global structural exploitation. In: Deveaux

Pantich

(eds) Exploitation: From Practice to Theory. Rowman and Littlefield, pp.35–58.

25.

McKeown

(2021) Structural injustice. Philosophy Compass 16(7): e12757.

26.

McKeown

(2024) With Power Comes Responsibility: The Politics of Structural Injustice. Bloomsbury.

27.

Mantouvalou

Wolff

(2024) Introduction. In: Mantouvalou

Wolff

(eds) Structural Injustice and the Law. University College London Press, pp.1–13.

28.

Mantouvalou

(2020) Structural injustice and the human rights of workers. Current Legal Problems 73(1): 59–87.

29.

Mantouvalou

(2023) Structural Injustice and Workers Rights. Oxford University Press.

30.

Marsden

(2019) Migrant workers, rights, and the rule of law: Responding to the justice gap. Dalhousie Law Journal 42: 153.

31.

Murphy

(2017) Tackling vulnerability to exploitation through regulation: The case of Irish fishermen. Industrial Law Journal 46(3): 417–434.

32.

Nuti

(2019) Temporary labor migration within the EU as structural injustice. Ethics and International Affairs 32(2): 203–225.

33.

O’Connell Davidson

(2010) New slavery, old binaries: Human trafficking and the borders of ‘freedom’. Global Networks 10: 244–261.

34.

Palumbo

(2025) Taking Vulnerabilities to Labour Exploitation Seriously: A Critical Analysis of Legal and Policy Approaches and Instruments in Europe (IMISCOE Research Series). Springer.

35.

Paron Trivellato

Weatherburn

(2025) Working conditions for migrant workers in Europe closing the rights protection and justice gaps: The role of the revised action plan on the European pillar on social rights. Available at: https://www.solidar.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/working-conditions-2025-final.pdf

36.

Pavlou

(2021) Migrant Domestic Workers in Europe: Law and the Construction of Vulnerability. Hart Publishing.

37.

PICUM (2022) Guide to undocumented workers’ rights at work under international and EU law. Available at: https://picum.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Guide-to-undocumented-workers-rights-EN.pdf

38.

Sciurba

(2019) Vulnerability, freedom of choice and structural global injustices: The ‘consent’ to exploitation of migrant women workers. In: Velasco

La Barbera

(eds) Challenging the Borders of Justice in the Age of Migrations. Springer, pp.225–241.

39.

Sommarribas

Mellinger

Nienaber

(eds) (2022) Interpretation and Distinction between Labour Exploitation in the Context of Trafficking in Human Beings and Particularly Exploitative Working Conditions Under the Employers Sanctions Directive. EMN Luxembourg.

40.

Triandafyllidou

(2022) Temporary migration: Category of analysis or category of practice? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48(16): 3847–3859.

41.

Verschueren

(2018) Employment and social security rights of third-country nationals under the EU labour migration directives. European Journal of Social Security 20(2): 100–115.

42.

Weatherburn

(2021) Labour Exploitation in Human Trafficking Law. Intersentia.

43.

Weatherburn

(2024) Working in Europe with a single permit: Golden ticket or pie in the sky? European Journal of Migration and Law 26(4): 446–473.

44.

Wintermayr

Weatherburn

(2021) Access to Protection and Remedy for Victims of Human Trafficking for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation in Belgium and the Netherlands. International Labour Organization.

45.

Young

(1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.

46.

Young

(2011) Responsibility for Justice. Oxford University Press.

47.

Zheng

(2018) What is my role in changing the system? A new model of responsibility for structural injustice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21(4): 869–885.

48.

Zoeteweij

(2018) The seasonal workers directive. Another vicious circle? In: Rijken

De Lange

(eds) Towards a Decent Labour Market for Low Waged Migrant Workers. Amsterdam University Press, pp.129–148.

49.

Zou

(2015) The legal construction of hyper-dependence and hyper-precarity in migrant work relations. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 31(2): 141–162.