History offers countless examples of victims whose experiences have shaped not only their own destinies but also the ethical foundations of justice. However, victims are often stereotyped as either passive or vengeful, marginalizing their potential contributions to legal systems. This article challenges such a representation by proposing a four-layer framework to understand how victims can help transform justice. The layers include (1) vulnerability after harm, as a shared human condition; (2) resilience, as the process of rebuilding the self; (3) ethical responsibility, where suffering is redirected into justice-oriented action; and (4) institutional receptivity and cooperation, meaning the legal system’s openness to victims’ voices. When these dimensions intersect, experiences of harm may lead to legal transformation. The argument is grounded in cases such as the activism of Gisèle Pelicot and Claudine Cordani in France, the Larry Nassar trial in the United States, and the emergence of ‘apostrophe laws’ that reflect victims’ influence on courtroom practice. The article concludes that although contemporary victimology has expanded victims’ rights and participation, it has yet to fully consider vulnerability as a constructive force. This calls for a new phase of victimology that recognizes victims as agents who, with institutional support, carry their vulnerability into the legal arena as a generative force.
AradauC (2004) The perverse politics of four-letter words: Risk and pity in the securitisation of human trafficking. Millennium: Journal of International Studies33(2): 251–277.
3.
ArendtH (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
ArendtH (1987) Collective responsibility. In: BernauerJW (ed.) Amor Mundi: Explorations in the Faith and Thought of Hannah Arendt. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 43–50.
5.
BackesALünenborgMSchankweilerK (2025) Shame must change sides: Affective media practices and the Mazan rape case on TikTok. Media, Culture & Society48(2): 304–323.
6.
Baez ColonVE (2025) Absent words, absent consent: Gisele Pelicot and the limits of French Rape Law. FIU Law Review20: 353.
7.
BeccariaC (1764[2009]) On Crimes and Punishments (Trans. NewmanGRMarongiuP). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
8.
BeloofDE (1999) The third model of criminal process: The victim participation model. Utah Law Review294–295.
9.
BibasS (2006) Transparency and participation in criminal procedure. New York University Law Review81: 911.
10.
BibasS (2012) The Machinery of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
BibasS (2020) Victims versus the state’s monopoly on punishment. Yale Law Journal Forum130: 857–864.
12.
BosmaAKMulderEPembertonA, et al. (2018) Observer reactions to emotional victims of serious crimes: Stereotypes and expectancy violations. Psychology, Crime & Law24(9): 957–977.
13.
BottingG (2025) The story David Milgaard wanted told: The unfinished fight: (Lisa Joy). The Wrongful Conviction Law Review6(2): 142–144.
14.
BrownKEcclestoneKEmmelN (2017) The many faces of vulnerability. Social Policy and Society16(3): 497–510.
15.
CameronJ (2003) Victim Privacy and the Open Court Principle (Publication No. rr03-VIC-1e). Policy Centre for Victims Issues, Research and Statistics Division. Department of Justice Canada.
16.
CamusA (1947) La peste. Paris: Gallimard.
17.
CapersIB (2021) Against prosecutors. Cornell Law Review105: 1561.
18.
CassellPGErezE (2023) How victim impact statements promote justice: Evidence from the content of statements delivered in Larry Nassar’s sentencing. Marquette Law Review107: 861.
19.
CassellPGGarvinM (2020) Protecting crime victims in state constitutions: The example of the new Marsy’s Law for Florida. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology110: 99.
20.
ChouliarakiL (2021) Victimhood: The affective politics of vulnerability. European Journal of Cultural Studies24(1): 10–27.
ChristieN (1977) Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology17(1): 1–15.
23.
ChristieN (1986) The ideal victim. In: FattahEA (ed.) From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–30.
24.
ClarkBPretoN (2018) Exploring the concept of vulnerability in health care. CMAJ190(11): E308–E309.
25.
ClarkJNUngarM (eds) (2021) Resilience, Adaptive Peacebuilding, and Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CordaniC (2020b) La Justice dans la peau. Paris: Bookelis.
28.
Coscas-WilliamsBAlbersteinM (2019) A patchwork of doors: Accelerated proceedings in continental criminal justice systems. New Criminal Law Review22(4): 585–617.
29.
Coscas-WilliamsBDancig-RosenbergHAlbersteinM (2024) Victims’ participation in an era of multidoor criminal justice. Connecticut Law Review56: 511–550.
30.
CrenshawKW (2013) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In: FinemanMMykitiukR (eds) The Public Nature of Private Violence. New York: Routledge, pp. 93–118.
Cunniff GilsonE (2016) Vulnerability and victimization: Rethinking key concepts in feminist discourses on sexual violence. Journal of Women in Culture and Society42(1): 71–98.
33.
CyrulnikB (2024) Les deux visages de la resilience. Paris: Odile Jacob.
34.
Dancig-RosenbergH (2023) Post or prosecute? Facebook, the criminal justice system, and sexual assault victims’ needs. University of Illinois Law Review1533–1586.
35.
Dancig-RosenbergHGalT (2019) Guest editors’ introduction: Multidoor criminal justice. New Criminal Law Review22(4): 347–358.
36.
Dancig-RosenbergHYosefN (2019) Crime-victimhood and intersectionality. Fordham Urban Law Journal47(1): 85–116.
37.
DoakJO’MahonyD (2006) The vengeful victim? Assessing the attitudes of victims participating in restorative youth conferencing. International Review of Victimology13(2): 157–177.
38.
EastealP (1994) Voices of the Survivors. North Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Spinifex Press.
39.
ErezEGlobokarJLIbarraPR (2014) Outsiders inside: Victim management in an era of participatory reforms. International Review of Victimology20(1): 169–188.
40.
FanarragaI (2020) What’s in a name? An empirical analysis of apostrophe laws. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society21(3): 39–68.
41.
FinemanMA (2010) The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal60(2): 251–275.
42.
FinemanMA (2018) Vulnerability and social justice. Valparaiso University Law Review53: 341.
43.
FranklV (1946) Man’s Search for Meaning. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
44.
FreibergAFlynnA (2020) Victims and Plea Negotiations: Overlooked and Unimpressed. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–35.
45.
GarmezyN (1993) Vulnerability and resilience. In: FunderDCParkeRDTomlinson-KeaseyC, et al. (eds) Studying Lives through Time: Personality and Development. American Psychological Association.
46.
GarvinM (2024) The (human) victims’ rights movement in the twenty-first-century United States. In: LevittLRosengardDBRubinJ (eds) Animals as Crime Victims. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 41–51.
47.
Goldman-GiladM (2011) Mi be-esh u-mi be-mayim: Mi-yomano shel srid ha-Shoah [Though fire and water: From the diary of a Shoah Survivor]. Tel-Aviv-Yafo, Israel: Miskal.
48.
GotellL (2002) The ideal victim, the hysterical complainant, and the disclosure of confidential records: The implications of the charter for Sexual Assault Law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 40.3/4: 251–295.
49.
GouriH (2004) Facing the Glass Booth: The Jerusalem Trial of Adolf Eichmann (Trans. SwirskyM.; Foreword. MintzA.). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
50.
GraciaJ (2018) Towards an inclusive victimology and a new understanding of public compassion to victims: From and beyond Christie’s ideal victim. In: DugganM (ed.) Revisiting the ‘Ideal Victim’: Developments in Critical Victimology. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 297–312.
51.
GreenS (2007) Crime, victimisation and vulnerability. In: WalklateS (ed.) Handbook of Victims and Victimology. Devon: Willan, pp. 91–118.
52.
GrunvaldS (2014) Victims facing the diversification of criminal response. Droit et société88: 649–668.
53.
HabermasJ (1984) Habermas: Questions and counter-questions. Praxis International4(3): 229–249.
54.
HajzlerY (2019) « C’est pas à moi d’avoir honte. ». France 3 Régions, Centre-Val de Loire, 29 October 2019.
55.
HendersonLN (1985) The wrongs of victims’ rights. Stanford Law Review37(4): 937–1021.
56.
HermanJ (2023) Truth and Repair: How Trauma Survivors Envision Justice. Hachette.
57.
HockettJMSaucierDA (2015) A systematic literature review of ‘rape victims’ versus ‘rape survivors’: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior25: 1–14.
58.
JägerviL (2014) Who wants to be an ideal victim? A narrative analysis of crime victims’ self-presentation. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention15(1): 73–88.
59.
JülichSMolineauxJGreenM (2020) The strategic use of terminology in restorative justice for persons harmed by sexual violence. The International Journal of Restorative Justice3: 215–234.
60.
KennedyJ (2019) The citizen victim: Reconciling the public and private in criminal sentencing. Criminal Law and Philosophy13(1): 83–108.
61.
Kennedy-MacfoyM (2024) On being fully human. European Journal of Women’s Studies31(4): 437–439.
62.
KirchengastT (2016) Victims and the Criminal Trial. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
63.
KirshenbaumA (2009) Victimology and Hebrew law: The evolution of the victim. Mishpat Ve’asakim147–182.
LaugerudSLangballeÅ (2017) Turning the witness stand into a speaker’s platform: Victim participation in the Norwegian legal system as exemplified by the trial against Anders Behring Breivik. Law & Society Review51(2): 227–251.
66.
LevinasE (1981) Otherwise Than Being or beyond Essence (3). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
67.
LevinasE (1984) Ethics and infinity. CrossCurrents34(2): 191–203.
68.
LevinasE (1987) Time and the Other. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
69.
Megan’s Law (1996) Pub. L. No. 104‑145, 110 Stat. 1345.
70.
McCraddenMCusimanoMD (2019) Voices of survivors: You will not destroy our light. British Journal of Sports Medicine53(22): 1384.
71.
McDonaldWF (1976) Towards a bicentennial revolution in criminal justice: The return of the victim. American Criminal Law Review13(4): 649–673.
72.
McGarryRWalklateS (2015) Victims: Trauma, Testimony and Justice. London: Routledge.
73.
MackenzieCRogersWDoddsS (2013) Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74.
ManikisM (2017) Expanding participation: Victims as agents of accountability in the criminal justice process. Public Law63–80.
75.
ManikisM (2019) A new model of the criminal justice process: Victims’ rights as advancing penal parsimony and moderation. Criminal Law Forum30(2): 201–223.
76.
MaoX (2018) A Levinasian reconstruction of the political significance of vulnerability. Religions10: 1–10.
77.
MarshallSE (2014) It isn’t just about you: Victims of crime, their associated duties, and public wrongs. In: DuffAFarmerLMarshallSE, et al. (eds) Criminalization: The Political Morality of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 291–306.
78.
MeiselsV (1999) Documentary film: The 81st blow. Journal of Genocide Research1(1): 127–129.
79.
Mendelsohn Archive (n.d.) Document no. 293, Library of Law, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
80.
MendelsohnB (1956) The victimology. Études internationales de psycho-sociologie criminelle104–136.
81.
MendelsohnB (1969) Le rapport entre la victimologie et le problème du génocide (schéma d’un code du génocide). Études de psycho-sociologie Criminelle16/17: 1–19.
82.
MétaisCBurelNGillhamJE, et al. (2022) Integrative review of the recent literature on human resilience: From concepts, theories, and discussions towards a complex understanding. Europe’s Journal of Psychology18(1): 98–119.
83.
MiersD (1989) Positivist victimology: A critique. International Review of Victimology1(1): 3–22.
84.
Mouchard-ZayH (2017) Simone Veil: « La Shoah: l’événement le plus européen de toute l’histoire du XXe siècle ». Poésie160–161(2): 316–318.
85.
NussbaumM (2002) Capabilities and social justice. International Studies Review4(2): 123–135.
86.
PackerHL (1968) Two Models of the Criminal Process. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
87.
PapendickMBohnerG (2017) ‘Passive victim–strong survivor’? Perceived meaning of labels applied to women who were raped. PLoS One12(5): e0177550.
88.
ParmentierS (2013) Confronting the ‘crime of crimes’: Key issues of transitional justice after genocide. In: IngelaereBParmentierBHaersJ, et al. (eds) Genocide, Risk and Resilience: An Interdisciplinary Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 108–127.
89.
PembertonA (2012) Too readily dismissed? A victimological perspective on penal populism. In: NelenHClaesenJCBeyond the Death Penalty. Antwerp: Intersentia, pp. 105–120.
90.
PembertonAMulderE (2023) Bringing injustice back in: Secondary victimization as epistemic injustice. Criminology and Criminal Justice25(4): 1181–1200.
91.
RandallM (2004) Domestic violence and the construction of ideal victims: Assaulted women’s image problems in law. Saint Louis University Public Law Review23: 107.
92.
RandallM (2010) Sexual assault law, credibility, and ‘ideal victims’: Consent, resistance, and victim blaming. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law22: 397.
93.
RoachK (1999) Four models of the criminal process. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology89(2): 671–716.
94.
RobertsJManikisM (2011) Victim Personal Statements at Sentencing: A Review of the Empirical Research. Report, Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses of England and Wales, February.
95.
RonelNTorenY (2012) Positive victimology: An innovation or ‘more of the same’?Temida15(2): 171–180.
96.
SalasD (2010) La volonté de punir. Paris: Hachette Littératures.
97.
SanderFE (1976) The multidoor courthouse. Barrister3: 18–20.
98.
SandsP (2017) East West Street: Personal stories about life and law. Washington University Global Studies Law Review16(3): 439–456.
99.
StaufferJ (2015) Ethical Loneliness: The Injustice of Not Being Heard. New York: Columbia University Press.
100.
TylerTR (2006) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
101.
Van DijkJ (2009) Free the victim: A critique of the Western conception of victimhood. International Review of Victimology16(1): 1–33.
102.
Von HentigH (1948) The Criminal and His Victim: Studies in the Sociobiology of Crime. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
103.
VrdoljakAF (2009) Human rights and genocide: The work of Lauterpacht and Lemkin in modern international law. European Journal of International Law20(4): 1163–1194.
104.
WalklateS (2011) Reframing criminal victimization: Finding a place for vulnerability and resilience. Theoretical Criminology15(2): 179–194.
105.
WalklateS (2016) The metamorphosis of the victim of crime: From crime to culture and the implications for justice. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy5(4): 4–16.
106.
WalklateS (2024) Are victim stories human rights stories? Towards an ethics and politics of listening and seeing for victimology. In: WeberLMarmoM (eds) A Research Agenda for a Human Rights Centred Criminology. Cham: Springer, pp. 175–188.
WemmersJA (2010) The meaning of justice for victims. International Handbook of Victimology23: 27–43.
109.
Yad Vashem (n.d.) Miki Goldman-Gilad: Testimony and biographical materials. The World Holocaust Remembrance Center. Available at: https://www.yadvashem.org (accessed 21 January 2026).
110.
ZgobaKMJenningsWGSalernoLM (2018) Megan’s Law 20 years later: An empirical analysis and policy review. Criminal Justice and Behavior45(7): 1028–1046.
