Recognition is increasingly conceptualized as a fundamental dimension of transitional justice (TJ), which aims to address serious human rights violations and promote healing of victims in transitional societies. Victims of forced displacement are among the victim groups who demand that their suffering be acknowledged and that their right to equal citizenship be reaffirmed. Within this framework, this paper examines how recognition in TJ relates to displaced people. Following an examination of displaced populations’ collective victimization, and sociopolitical marginalization, this paper explores the role and responsibility of states in ensuring effective and meaningful recognition through reparation. It does so by analyzing reparation mechanisms and demands in Argentina and Iraq, two cases where displacement has been a major issue at the heart of TJ. Despite their distinct contexts of violence, the cases shed light on diverse reparation measures implemented to acknowledge past abuses, provide redress, and restore equal citizenship. Based on an empirical study that involved an analysis of relevant literature and documents, this research provides insights into how states recognize forced displacement as a form of collective victimization and view displaced populations as collectives.
Álvarez BerastegiAHeartyK (2019) A context-based model for framing political victimhood: Experiences from Northern Ireland and the Basque Country. International Review of Victimology25(1): 19–36.
2.
ArbourL (2006) Economic and Social Justice for Societies in Transition. New York: New York University.
3.
BalardiniL (2014) The Long Struggle for Accountability in Argentina: The Role of Civil Society’s Activism and State Actors. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS), Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
4.
Bar-TalDChernyak-HaiLSchoriN, et al. (2009) A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross91(874): 229–258.
5.
BolzmanC (2002) De l’exil à la diaspora: l’exemple de la migration chilienne. Presses de Sciences Po «Autrepart»22: 91–107.
6.
BradleyM (2018) Durable solutions and the right of return for IDPs: Evolving interpretations. International Journal of Refugee Law30(2): 218–242.
7.
ButtiELeyhBM (2019) Intersectionality and transformative reparations: The case of Colombian marginal youths. International Criminal Law Review19(5): 753–782.
8.
CaronDMorrisB (2002) The UN compensation commission: Practical justice, not retribution. European Journal of International Law13(1): 183–199.
9.
CasiraghiF (2019) La reparación del exilio en la Argentina. La Corte Suprema y un fallo imprescindible (LA LEY, AR/DOC/3466/2019). Available at: https://cdi.mecon.gob.ar/bases/jurid/19332.pdf (accessed 7 July 2025)
DavisRBentonGFerrisE, et al. (2017) Access to Durable Solutions among Idps in Iraq: Part One. Washington, DC: IOM and Walsh School of Foreign Service.
13.
De GreiffP (2006a) Justice and reparations. In: De GreiffP (ed.) The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 451–477.
14.
De GreiffP (2006b) Repairing the past: Compensation for victims of human rights violations. In: De GreiffP (ed.) The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–18.
15.
De GreiffP (2012) Theorizing transitional justice. In: WilliamsMElsterJ (eds) Transitional Justice: NOMOS LI. New York: New York University Press, pp. 31–77.
16.
DuthieR (2012) Contributing to Durable Solutions: Transitional Justice and the Integration and Reintegration of Displaced Persons. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, Brookings-LSE Project on Internal Displacement, Advancing Transitional Justice Series.
17.
Du ToitA (2000) The moral foundations of the South African TRC: Truth as acknowledgment and justice as recognition. In: RothbergRIThompsonD (eds) Truth Vs. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 122–140.
18.
EdgcumbeS (2020) Extremism, contested territory and diversity: An opportunity for development of Iraq’s national policy on displacement in 2020? IDRP Working paper no. 7. London: Refugee Law Initiative, University of London.
19.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC), UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), et al. (2007) Handbook on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons: Implementing the ‘Pinheiro Principles’. Rome: FAO, UNHCR, IDMC, OCHA, OHCHR and NRC.
20.
Gianoglio PantanoLM (2012) Los exiliados en La Justicia Transicional argentina: Una aproximación a perspectivas y debates respecto al exilio. In: Jornadas de Trabajo sobre Exilios Políticos del Cono Sur en el siglo XX, 26, 27 y 28 de septiembre de 2012, La Plata, Argentina, at http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.2544/ev.2544.pdf (accessed 7 July 2025)
GulottaG (1985) Collective victimization. Victimology: An International Journal10(1–4): 710–723.
23.
GümüşbaşA (2023) Transitional justice perspective on property reparations in Iraq. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism23(3): 389–406.
24.
HaldemannF (2008) Another kind of justice: Transitional justice as recognition. Cornell International Law Journal41(2): 675–737.
25.
HassineKLeckieS (2016) The United Nations Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons: The Pinheiro Principles: A Commentary. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
HonnethA (1996) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
HonnethA (2001) Invisibility: On the epistemology of ‘recognition’. Aristotelian Society Supplementary75(1): 111–126.
30.
IOM (2019) Access to Durable Solutions Among IDPs in Iraq: Experiences Applying to Compensation. Baghdad, Iraq: International Organization for Migration (IOM).
31.
JahnIR (2016) Housing, Land and Property (HLP) Issues facing Returnees in Retaken Areas of Iraq. Baghdad, Iraq: International Organization for Migration.
JensenS (2014) Memorias Lights, memorias anestesiadas. Reflexiones acerca de los olvidos del exilio en el relato público y social de los setenta en la Argentina. In: PatriciaFDanielL (eds) Los usos del olvido: recorridos, dimensiones y nuevas preguntas. Rosario, Argentina: Prohistoria Ediciones, pp. 159–192.
34.
KourtisD (2023) The ultimate victim of genocide and the question of collective reparations. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights30(1): 1–28.
35.
LacroixTFiddian-QasmiyehE (2013) Refugee and Diaspora memories: The politics of remembering and forgetting. Journal of Intercultural Studies Special Issue34(6): 684–696.
36.
LangmackFJ (2023) Reparation in Transitional Justice: A Normative Framework. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
37.
LópezMA (2012) Exiliados políticos y la constitución como víctimas frente al estado: implicaciones para la acción política y el proceso de reparación en Argentina. In: Jornadas de Trabajo sobre Exilios Políticos del Cono Sur en el siglo XX, 26, 27 y 28 de septiembre de 2012, La Plata, Argentina, at http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.2548/ev.2548.pdf (accessed 7 July 2025)
38.
NiebergallH (2020) Overcoming evidentiary weaknesses in reparation claims programmes. In: FerstmanCGoetzM (eds) Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 217–239.
39.
ParmentierSRauschenbachMHeinL (2022) Diaspora communities in transitional justice: A hidden presence. In: ElcherothGDe MelN (eds) In the Shadow of Transitional Justice. New York: Routledge, pp. 107–124.
40.
RauschenbachMParmentierSVan CraenM (2020) Towards social restoration in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Exploring the place of symbolic forms of transitional justice. In: FunkJGoodNBerryME (eds) Healing and Peacebuilding after War: Transforming Trauma in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Studies in Peace and Conflict Resolution). Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 167–188.
41.
Roht-ArriazaN (2014) Reparations and economic, social, and cultural rights. In: SharpEN (ed.) Justice and Economic Violence in Transition. New York: Springer, pp. 109–138.
RomboutsHSardaroPVandeginsteS (2005) The right to reparation for victims of gross and systematic violations of human rights. In: de FeyterKParmentierSBossuytM, et al. (eds) Out of the Ashes: Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 135–149.
44.
RooneyEAoláinFN (2018) Transitional justice from the margins: Intersections of identities, power and human rights. International Journal of Transitional Justice12(1): 1–8.
45.
RudlingA (2019) ‘I’m not that chained-up little person’: Four paragons of victimhood in transitional justice discourse. Human Rights Quarterly41(2): 421–440.
46.
SandovalCPuttickM (2018) Reparations for the Victims of Conflict in Iraq: Lessons Learned From Comparative Practice. London: Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights and Minority Rights Group International.
UNDG and WB (2003) Housing and Urban Management Sector Report: Republic of Iraq (Joint Needs Assessment). Washington, DC: United Nations Development Group and World Bank.
49.
UN General Assembly (2005) Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law (UN Basic Principles on Reparations) (A/RES/60/147. 2005). New York: UN General Assembly, at https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/remedyandreparation.aspx (accessed 26 January 2022).
50.
UN General Assembly (2014) Promotion of truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-recurrence (A/69/518, 69). New York: UN General Assembly.
51.
UN Human Rights Council (2020) Visit to Iraq: Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons (A/HRC/44/41/Add.1, 44). Geneva: UN Human Rights Council.
52.
Van der AuweraertP (2007) Displacement and National Institutions: Reflections on the Iraqi Experience. Washington, DC: Middle East Institute, Foundation for Strategic Research.
53.
Van HoutteHDasH (2008) Post-War Restoration of Property Rights Under International Law: Procedural Aspects, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
VollhardtJRNairR (2018) The two-sided nature of individual and intragroup experiences in the aftermath of collective victimization: Findings from four diaspora groups. European Journal of Social Psychology48(4): 412–432.
55.
VollhardtJRMazurLBLemahieuM (2014) Acknowledgment after mass violence: Effects on psychological well-being and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations17(3): 306–323.
56.
WilliamsRC (2012) Protection in the past tense: Restitution at the juncture of humanitarian response to displacement and transitional justice. In: DuthieR (ed.) Transitional Justice and Displacement. New York: Social Science Research Council, pp. 85–136.
57.
YankelevichP (2007) Exilio y dictadura. In: ClaraLECrespoHYankelevichP (eds) Argentina, 1976. Estudios en torno al golpe de Estado. México City, México: El Colegio de México, pp. 205–231.
58.
ZazaKSteinerEBilikhodzeM, et al. (2020) Mosul after the Battle: Reparations for Civilian HARM and the Future of Ninewa. London: Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights and Minority Rights Group International.
59.
ZuprukBWhelanABrouchE (2018) Social and political perspectives of Iraqi IDPs from Ninewa and their host communities: A focus group and key informant interview study in Iraq. International Republican Institute, at https://www.iri.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018-09-05_iraq_fgd_report.pdf (accessed 7 July 2025).
