The role of victims in the criminal trial has been subject to considerable critique in recent years. This article argues that scholarship and policy governing the treatment of victims and witnesses in ‘ordinary’ criminal trials within ‘settled’ societies may be substantially enriched by drawing lessons from the roles of, and practices affecting, victims within post-conflict societies. There is a clear need for policy-makers and law reformers to look beyond the familiar spheres of the domestic criminal process if the justice system is to become more effective, just and legitimate in the eyes of both victims and the wider public. This article draws on both theory and praxis on the role of victims within transitional justice, and contends that trial justice in common law systems may be enriched through centring processes on three key themes which are commonly emphasized in transitional justice frameworks, these being: (i) truth recovery; (ii) victim participation; and (iii) reparation.
AshworthA (2000) Victims’ rights, defendants’ rights and criminal procedure. In: CrawfordAGoodeyJ (eds) Integrating a Victim Perspective Within Criminal Justice: International debates. Aldershot: Ashgate Dartmouth, 185–204.
2.
AukermanM (2002) Extraordinary evil, ordinary crime: A framework for understanding transitional justice. Harvard Human Rights Journal15: 39–97.
3.
BalaNEvansABalaE (2010) Hearing the voices of children in Canada's criminal justice system: Recognising capacity and facilitating testimony. Child & Family Law Quarterly22: 21–45.
4.
BandesS (1996) Empathy, narrative, and victim impact statements. University of Chicago Law Review63(2): 361–413.
5.
BarnettR (1977) Restitution: A new paradigm of criminal justice. Ethics87(4): 279–301.
6.
BellC (2009) Transitional justice, interdisciplinarity and the state of the ‘field’ or ‘non-field’. International Journal of Transitional Justice3(1): 5–27.
7.
BennettWLFeldmanM (1981) Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8.
BibasS (2007) Forgiveness in criminal procedure. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law4(3): 329–348.
9.
BonackerTFormWPfeifferD (2011) Transitional justice and victim participation in Cambodia: A world polity perspective. Global Society25(1): 113–134.
10.
BraithwaiteJ (1992) Juvenile Offending: New Theory and Practice. Address to the National Conference on Juvenile Justice, Adelaide, Institute of Criminology, September 1992.
11.
BraithwaiteJ (2002) Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BraithwaiteJ (2010) Reconciliation and Architectures of Commitment: Sequencing Peace in Bougainville. Canberra: ANU Press.
13.
BrantsC (2011) Comparing criminal process as part of legal culture. In: NelkenD (ed.) Comparative Criminal Justice and Globalisation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
14.
BrienenMHoegenH (2000) Victims of Crime in 22 European Criminal Justice Systems: The Implementation of Recommendation (85) 11 of the Council of Europe on the Position of the Victim in the Framework of Criminal Law and Procedure. Niemegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
15.
BurmanSSchärfW (1990) Creating people's justice: Street committees and people's courts in a South African city. Law and Society Review24(3): 693–744.
16.
BurumaY (2004) Doubts on the upsurge of the victim’s role in criminal law. In: KapteinHMalschM (eds) Crime, Victims, and Justice: Essays on Principles and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
17.
ByrneC (2004) Benefit or burden: Victims’ reflections on TRC participation. Peace and Conflict10(3): 237–256.
18.
ByrneS (2001) Consociational and civic society approaches to peacebuilding in Northern Ireland. Journal of Peace Research38(3): 327–352.
19.
CavadinoMDignanJ (1996) Towards a framework for conceptualising and evaluating models of criminal justice from a victim’s perspective. International Review of Victimology4(3): 153–182.
20.
ChalmersJDuffPLeverickF (2007) Victim impact statements: Can work, do work (for those who bother to make them). Criminal Law Review (May): 360–379.
21.
ChristieN (1977) Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology17(1): 1–15.
22.
ClampK (2013) Restorative Justice in Transition. London: Routledge.
23.
ClampKDoakJ (2012) More than words: Restorative justice concepts in transitional justice settings. International Criminal Law Review12(3): 339–360.
24.
CoenM (2014) ‘With cat-like tread’: Jury trial and the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review14(1): 107–131.
25.
CohenS (1995) State crimes of previous regimes: Knowledge, accountability, and the policing of the past. Law and Social Inquiry20: 7–50.
26.
ColeD (2001) Psychodrama and the training of trial lawyers: Finding the story. North Illinois University Law Review21: 1–40.
27.
CombsN (2007) Guilty Pleas in International Criminal Law. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28.
Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor (2006) Final Report. Available athttp://www.etan.org/news/2006/cavr.htm (accessed 4 November 2013).
29.
Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses in England and Wales (2011) Victims’ Views of Court and Sentencing. London: Ministry of Justice.
30.
CossinsA (2008) Restorative justice and child sex offences: The theory and the practice. British Journal of Criminology48: 359–378.
31.
DalyK (2008) Setting the record straight and a call for radical change: A reply to Annie Cossins on ‘Restorative justice and child sex offences’. British Journal of Criminology48(4): 557–566.
32.
DavisG (1992) Making Amends: Mediation and Reparation in Criminal Justice. London: Routledge.
33.
De GreiffP (2010) Reparation programs: Patterns, tendencies, and challenges. Politorbis: Dealing with the Past50(3): 53–64.
34.
DembourMBHaslamE (2004) Silencing hearings? Victim-witnesses at war crimes trials. European Journal of International Law15(1): 151–177.
35.
DiazC (2008) Challenging impunity from below: The contested ownership of transitional justice in Colombia. In: McEvoyKMcGregorL (eds) Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford: Hart.
36.
DoakJ (2008) Victims’ Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: Reconceiving the Role of Third Parties. Oxford: Hart.
37.
DoakJ (2011) The therapeutic dimension of transitional justice: Emotional repair and victim satisfaction in international trials and truth commissions. International Criminal Law Review11(2): 263–298.
38.
DoakJTaylorL (2013) Hearing the voices of victims and offenders: The role of emotions in criminal sentencing. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly64(1): 25–46.
39.
EliasR (1986) The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology, and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
EllisonL (2001) The Adversarial Process and the Vulnerable Witness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
ElsterJ (2004) Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
ErezE (1999) Who’s afraid of the big bad victim? Victim impact statements as victim empowerment and enhancement of justice. Criminal Law Review (July): 545–556.
43.
ErezETontodonatoP (1990) The effect of victim participation in sentencing on sentence outcome. Criminology28(3): 451–474.
44.
EricsonR (1981) Making Crime: A Study of Detective Work. Toronto: Butterworths.
45.
FercelloCUmbreitM (1998) Client Evaluation of Family Group Conferencing in 12 Sites in the First Judicial District of Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: Center for Restorative Justice and Mediation.
46.
FieldingN (2006) Courting Violence. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
47.
FreemanM (2006) Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
FrehseeD (1999) Restitution and the offender–victim arrangement in German criminal law: Development and theoretical implications. Buffalo Criminal Law Review3(1): 235–259.
49.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
GeisG (1990) Crime victims: Practices and prospects. In LurigioASkoganWGDavisRC (eds) Victims of Crime: Problems, Policies, Programs. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 50–57.
51.
GewurzDMercurioM (2012) The Victims’ Bill of Rights: Are victims all dressed up with no place to go?Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development8(1): 251–278.
52.
GrayD (2005) An excuse-centered approach to transitional justice. Fordham Law Review74: 2621–2693.
53.
GreenPJWardT (2000) State crime, human rights, and the limits of criminology. Social Justice27(1): 101–115.
54.
HallM (2009) Victims of Crime: Policy and Practice in Criminal Justice. London: Routledge.
55.
HallM (2010) Victims and Policy-Making: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
56.
HamberBNagengDO’MalleyG (2000) ‘Telling it like it is …’: Understanding the Truth and Reconciliation Commission from the perspective of survivors. Psychology in Society26: 18–41.
57.
HaynerP (2011) Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. London: Routledge.
58.
HenckaertsJMDoswald-BeckL (2006) Customary International Humanitarian Law. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.
59.
HenhamR (2011) Sentencing and the Legitimacy of Trial Justice. London: Routledge.
60.
HermanJL (2003) The mental health of crime victims: Impact of legal intervention. Journal of Traumatic Stress16(2): 159–166.
61.
HopkinsB (2012) Restorative justice as social justice. Nottingham Law Journal21: 121–132.
62.
HoyleC (2011) Empowerment through emotion: The use and abuse of victim impact evidence. In: ErezEKilchlingMWemmersJ (eds) Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Victim Participation in Justice: International Perspectives. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
KaminerDSteinDJMbangaINompumeleloZ (2001) The Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa: Relation to psychiatric status and forgiveness among survivors of human rights abuses. British Journal of Psychiatry178: 373–377.
65.
KarremansJCVan LangeP (2005) Does activating justice help or hurt in promoting forgiveness?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology41: 290–297.
66.
KarstedtS (2010) From absence to presence, from silence to voice: Victims in international and transitional justice since the Nuremberg trials. International Review of Victimology17(1): 9–30.
67.
KelsallMSStepakoffS (2007) ‘When we wanted to talk about rape’: Silencing sexual violence at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. International Journal of Transitional Justice1: 355–374.
68.
KilpatrickDGAciernoR (2003) Mental health needs of crime victims: Epidemiology and outcomes. Journal of Traumatic Stress16(2): 119–132.
69.
KingstonJ (2006) Balancing justice and reconciliation in East Timor. Critical Asian Studies38(3): 271–302.
70.
LandsmanS (1984) The Adversary System: A Description and Defence (Washington, The American Enterprise Institute).
71.
LundyPMcGovernM (2008) Whose justice? Rethinking transitional justice from the bottom up. Journal of Law and Society35(2): 265–292.
72.
McBarnetD (1983) Victim in the witness box: Confronting victimology’s stereotype. Contemporary Crises7: 293–303.
73.
McEvoyK (2006) Making Peace with the Past: Options for Truth Recovery in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Healing Through Remembering.
74.
McEvoyKMcConnachieK (2013) Victims and transitional justice: Voice, agency and blame. Social & Legal Studies22: 489–513.
75.
McEvoyKMcGregorL (eds) (2008) Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford: Hart.
76.
McEvoyKMikaH (2001) Punishment, policing and praxis: Restorative justice and non-violent alternatives to paramilitary punishments in Northern Ireland. Policing and Society: An International Journal11(3–4): 359–382.
77.
McGonigle-LeyhBN (2011) Procedural Justice? Victim Participation in International Criminal Proceedings. Antwerp: Intersentia.
78.
MillerL (2008) Counseling Crime Victims: Practical Strategies for Mental Health Professionals. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
79.
Ministry of Justice (2013) Code of Practice for Victims of Crime. London: Ministry of Justice.
80.
NaqviY (2006) The right to the truth in international law: Fact or fiction?International Review of the Red Cross88(682): 245–273.
81.
NserekoDDN (2010) The role of victims in criminal proceedings: Lessons national jurisdictions can learn from the ICC. Criminal Law Forum21(3/4): 399–415.
82.
PosnerEAVermeuleA (2004) Transitional justice as ordinary justice. Harvard Law Review117(3): 761–825.
83.
RaittF (2010) Independent Legal Representation for Complainers in Sexual Offence Trials. Glasgow: Rape Crisis Scotland.
84.
RobertsP (1998) On the preconditions and possibilities of criminal law theory. South African Journal of Criminal Justice11: 285–324.
85.
RobertsP (2011) Does Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights require reasoned verdicts in criminal trials?Human Rights Law Review11(2): 213–235.
86.
RobertsJVErezE (2010) Victim impact statements at sentencing: Expressive and instrumental purposes. In: BottomsAERobertsJV (eds) Hearing the Victim: Adversarial Justice, Crime Victims, and the State. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
87.
RobertsJVManikisM (2011) Victim Personal Statements: A Review of Empirical Research. London: Ministry of Justice.
88.
RockP (1993) The Social World of an English Crown Court: Witnesses and Professionals in the Crown Court Centre at Wood Green. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
89.
SandersAJonesI (2007) The victim in court. In: WalkateS (ed.) Handbook of Victims and Victimology. Cullompton: Willan.
90.
ShaplandJHallM (2007) What do we know about the effects of crime on victims?International Review of Victimology14(2): 175–217.
91.
ShaplandJHallM (2010) Victims at court: Necessary accessories or principal players at centre stage? In: BottomsARobertsJV (eds) Hearing the Victim: Adversarial Justice, Crime Victims and the State. Cullompton: Willan.
92.
ShaplandJWilmoreJDuffP (1985) Victims and the Criminal Justice System. Aldershot: Gower.
93.
ShermanLWStrangH (2003) Repairing the harm: Victims and restorative justice. Utah Law Review1: 15–42.
94.
SmythJMPennebakerJW (1999) Sharing one’s story: Translating emotional experiences into words as a coping tool. In: SnyderCR (ed.) Coping: The Psychology of What Works. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95.
SorochinskyM (2009) Prosecuting torturers, protecting ‘child molesters’: Toward a power balance model of criminal process for international human rights law. Michigan Journal of International Law31: 157–213.
96.
SpencerJRLambME (2012) Children and Cross-Examination: Time to Change the Rules?Oxford: Hart.
97.
StrangH (2002) Repair or Revenge? Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
98.
TinsleyYMcDonaldE (2011) Use of alternative ways of giving evidence by vulnerable witnesses: Current proposals, issues and challenges. Victoria University Wellington Law Review42: 705.
99.
TorpeyJ (2006) Making Whole What Has Been Smashed: On Reparations Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100.
UN (2005) Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. New York: United Nations.
101.
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2009) Report: The Right to Truth. UN Doc A/HRC/12/19. Geneva: United Nations.
102.
United Nations Security Council (2004) The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies. Report of the Secretary-General, 23 August 2004 (S/2004/616).
103.
Van den WyngaertC (2012) Victims before international criminal courts: Some views and concerns of an ICC trial judge. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law44: 475–496.
104.
WaldorfL (2006) Rwanda's failing experiment in restorative justice. In: SullivanDTifftL (eds) Handbook of Restorative justice: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge.
105.
WeitekampEVanspauwenKParmentierSValiñasMGeritsR (2006) How to deal with mass victimization and gross human rights violations: A restorative justice approach. In: EwaldUTurkovicK (eds) Large-Scale Victimisation as a Potential Source of Terrorist Activities: Importance of Regaining Security in Post-Conflict Societies. IOS Press: Amsterdam.
106.
WemmersJ (2006) Reparation and the International Criminal Court: Meeting the Needs of Victims. Research Group Victimology and Restorative Justice, International Centre for Comparative Criminology, University of Montreal, Montreal.
107.
WemmersJ (2009) Where do they belong? Giving victims a place in the criminal justice process. Criminal Law Forum20(4): 395–416.
108.
WilliamsB (2005) Victims of Crime and Community Justice. London: Jessica Kingsley.
109.
WoolfordARatnerRS (2008) Informal Reckonings: Conflict Resolution in Mediation, Restorative Justice, and Reparations. London: Routledge.
110.
ZacklinR (2004) Failings of ad hoc international tribunals. Journal of International Criminal Justice2(2): 541–545.
