The impact of top-down and bottom-up factors in shaping the status of the victim: A study of recent victim empowerment shifts in Slovenia

Abstract

Victims of crime have seen a significant shift in the criminal justice approaches towards them over time: from rather passive observers of the conflict between the state and the offender to more active agents whose thoughts, wishes and emotions are allowed to be voiced and whose participation is recognised as legitimate in its own right within the criminal process. The article analyses to what extent this empowerment shift is reflected in Slovenia, specifically how the criminal law acknowledges and defines the victim in the criminal justice setting. While the European Union (EU) legislation in this area, as a top-down factor in shaping the rights and status of the victim, has provided an important impetus for legislative changes, particularly in relation to certain aspects, rights and categories of crime victims, as well as the definition of the victim, the more conceptual recent transformations (e.g. an altered model of rape) arose out of changed societal sensitivities spurred by triggering events and a wider social and political context. Implications and outstanding challenges are discussed in the concluding section.

Keywords

Victim criminal justice contextual factors sexual violence Slovenia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amnesty International (2021) NOVO! Sprememba opredelitve posilstva. Amnesty International Slovenia, 4 March. Available at: https://www.amnesty.si/novo-sprememba-opredelitve-posilstva-spomlad-2021 (accessed 1 December 2023).

Blagg

(2019) Bystander effect. Encyclopedia Britannica, 7 January. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/bystander-effect (accessed 1 December 2023).

Boulding

(2016) NGOs, Political Protest, and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burgen

(2022) Spain passes ‘only yes means yes’ sexual consent law. The Guardian, 25 August. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/25/spain-only-yes-means-yes-sexual-consent-bill-expected-to-become-law (accessed 1 December 2023).

Burgin

(2018) Persistent narratives of force and resistance: Affirmative consent as law reform. The British Journal of Criminology 59(2): 296–314.

Castells

(2000) The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Castells

Cardoso

(eds) (2005) The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins University.

Chini

(2022) Belgium in brief: Let’s talk about sex, baby. The Brussels Times, 18 March. Available at: https://www.brusselstimes.com/211397/belgium-in-brief-lets-talk-about-sex-baby (accessed 10 October 2022).

Christie

(1986) The ideal victim. In: Fattah

(ed.) From Crime Policy to Victim Policy. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 17–30.

10.

Coleman

(1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.

11.

Cviticanin

(2021) #NisiSama: The constructive role of social media in supporting the Ex-Yugoslav #MeToo movement. International Public Policy Review, 27 February. Available at: https://ippr-journal.com/2021/02/27/nisisama-the-constructive-role-of-social-media-in-supporting-the-ex-yugoslav-metoo-movement/ (accessed 10 October 2022).

12.

Da Silva Ribeiro Gomes

Pessoa Cavalcanti

Gómez-Abarca

(2021) Notes on the criminalization of social movements in Latin America: Examples from Brazil and Mexico. Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais 26(3): 519–532. Available at: https://research.brighton.ac.uk/en/publications/notes-on-the-criminalisation-of-social-movements-in-latin-america (accessed 25 November 2022).

13.

Daigle

(2018) Victimology: A Text/Reader. 2nd ed. London: Sage.

14.

Elias

(1986) The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology and Human Rights. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15.

European Commission (2016) Special Eurobarometer 449 – Report: Gender-based violence, November. Available at: https://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f60437fd-e9db-11e6-ad7c-01aa75ed71a1.0001.01/DOC_1 (accessed 20 December 2023).

16.

European Commission (2020) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: EU Strategy on Victims’ Rights (2020–2025) (COM(2020) 258 final, 24 June). Brussels: European Commission.

17.

European Commission (2022) Commission Staff Working Document Evaluation of Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 Establishing Minimum Standards on the Rights, Support and Protection of Victims of Crime, and Replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA (SWD(2022) 179 final, 28 June). Brussels: European Commission.

18.

Fattah

(2000) Victimology: Past, present and future. Criminologie 33(1): 17–46.

19.

Ferlič Žgajnar

(2021) Igor Pribac obžaluje, da senat ni prepoznal njegovih argumentov. Delo, 26 January. Available at: https://www.delo.si/novice/slovenija/filozof-igor-pribac-caka-na-odlocitev-senata-univerze/ (accessed 20 May 2024).

20.

Galliano

Noble

Travis

, et al (1993) Victim reactions during rape/sexual assault: A preliminary study of the immobility response and its correlates. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 8(1): 109–114.

21.

Goldsworthy

(2018) Yes means yes: Moving to a different model of consent for sexual interactions. The Conversation, 29 January. Available at: https://theconversation.com/yes-means-yes-moving-to-a-different-model-of-consent-for-sexual-interactions-90630 (accessed 10 October 2022).

22.

Greenpeace Slovenija (2021) 7 razlogov zakaj obkrožiti PROTI škodljivemu zakonu o vodah, 7 July. Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/slovenia/blog/4164/7-razlogov-zakaj-obkroziti-proti-skodljivemu-zakonu-o-vodah/ (accessed 15 March 2024).

23.

Greif

(2023) Question of the Member of Parliament, addressed to the Minister of Justice, at the 15the Session of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia, 18 December. Available at: https://www.dz-rs.si/wps/portal/Home/seje/evidenca/!ut/p/z1/jY_BCoJAFEW_xYVb30sxrN1IYI1FqIk2m9CYRkEdGS2hr09oVZT4dvdyzoUHDFJgTfYoRdaXssmqMZ_Z8kJXPqG-t0DP9hwMTv4xpFsXnZ0NyRdghjYGG9M9RGhhFJnA5vj45wjO8ycANj1PgYlK5u9XSZNbjgCm-I0rroy7Guui79turaOOwzAYQkpRceMqax1_KYXsekg_SWjrOE6fe54QTXsB7VS2Pw!!/dz/d5/L2dBISEvZ0FBIS9nQSEh/?mandat=IX&type=mag&uid=FC25067934DFA50FC1258A89003D2345 (accessed 20 December 2023).

24.

Hopper

(2015) Why many rape victims don’t fight or yell. The Washington Post, 23 June. Available at: https://evawintl.org/wp-content/uploads/Hopper-2015-Why-Many-Rape-Victims-Dont-Fight-or-Yell-Washington-Post.pdf (accessed 10 October 2022).

25.

Kanduč

(ed.) (2002) Žrtve, Viktimizacije in Viktimološke Perspektive. Ljubljana: Inštitut za kriminologijo pri Pravni fakulteti.

26.

Karmen

(2016) Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

27.

Karstedt

(2002) Emotions and criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology 6(3): 299–317.

28.

Khumalo

(2018) The constitutionality of criminalising peaceful protests. Without Prejudice 18(9): 18–19.

29.

Kirchengast

(2015) Enforceable rights for victims of crime: Shifting the state/offender paradigm in adversarial systems of criminal law and justice. In: Potts

Pei

(eds) Pandora’s Box: Crime, Justice and the People. St Lucia, QLD, Australia: Justice and the Law Society, University of Queensland, pp. 25–36.

30.

Le Monde with AFP (2022) Spain passes toughened ‘Only yes means yes’ rape law. Le Monde, 26 August. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2022/08/26/spain-passes-toughened-only-yes-means-yes-rape-law_5994803_4.html (accessed 10 October 2022).

31.

Levica (2023) Tatjana Greif: Pobuda ministrici za pravosodje glede ustrezne obravnave spolnega nasilja. Levica.si, 5 December. Available at: https://www.levica.si/tatjana-greif-sodstvo-spolno-nasilje/ (accessed 20 December 2023).

32.

McNamara

Quilter

(2019) Criminalising protest through the expansion of police ‘move-on’ powers: A case study from Australia. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 58: 22–34.

33.

Peršak

(2019) Beyond public punitiveness: The role of emotions in criminal law policy. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 57: 47–58.

34.

Peršak

(2022) Criminalising hate crime and hate speech at EU level: Extending the list of Eurocrimes under Article 83(1) TFEU. Criminal Law Forum 33(2): 85–119.

35.

Peseckyte

(2023) EU countries divided over the inclusion of rape to violence against women directive. EURACTIV, 13 November (updated 20 November 2023). Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/health-consumers/news/eu-countries-divided-over-the-inclusion-of-rape-in-violence-against-women-directive/ (accessed 15 December 2023).

36.

Petrovčič

(2023) Spolni delikti: Premalo izobraženi sodniki? Mladina 50, 15 December. Available at: https://www.mladina.si/229414/spolni-delikti/ (accessed 20 December 2023).

37.

Pickard

(2019) Politics, Protest and Young People: Political Participation and Dissent in 21st Century Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

38.

Rus

(2021) Državljani odločno povozili Vizjakov zakon. Dnevnik, 11 July. Available at: https://www.dnevnik.si/1042958885/slovenija/odprla-so-se-volisca-za-glasovanje-na-referendumu-o-noveli-zakona-o-vodah (accessed 15 March 2024).

39.

Schreck

Berg

(2021) What ideas of victimization and vulnerability mean for criminological theory: A logical appraisal. In: Pratt

Turanovic

(eds) Revitalizing Victimization Theory: Revisions, Applications, and New Directions. New York: Routledge, pp. 15–55.

40.

Schünemann

(1999) The role of the victim within the criminal justice system: A three-tiered concept. Buffalo Criminal Law Review 3(1): 33–49.

41.

Sebba

(1982) The victim’s role in the penal process: A theoretical orientation. The American Journal of Comparative Law 30: 217–240.

42.

Selby

(2020) ‘Why didn’t she fight back?’ The myth that’s used to justify sexual violence. Refinery29, 18 March. Available at: https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2020/03/9547973/freezing-up-response-rape (accessed 15 November 2022).

43.

Shapland

Hall

(2007) What do we know about the effects of crime on victims? International Review of Victimology 14: 175–217.

44.

Spalek

(2006) Crime Victims: Theory, Policy and Practice. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

45.

Staley

(2013) Bystanders have a responsibility to do what they can. The New York Times, 22 April. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/04/21/the-bystanders-who-could-be-heroes/bystanders-have-a-responsibility-to-do-what-they-can (accessed 10 October 2022).

46.

Šter

(2021) Spolno nadlegovanje: tudi slovenska igralka razkrila svojo zgodbo. RTV SLO – MMC, 1 February. Available at: https://www.rtvslo.si/kultura/oder/spolno-nadlegovanje-tudi-slovenska-igralka-razkrila-svojo-zgodbo/550992 (accessed 23 May 2023).

47.

The Slovenian Press Agency (STA) (2021a) Ob večinski podpori poslancev uzakonjena definicija spolnega nasilja po modelu samo ja je ja. Primorske Novice, 4 June. Available at: https://www.metropolitan.si/novice/ob-vecinski-podpori-poslancev-uzakonjena-definicija-spolnega-nasilja-po-modelu-samo-ja-je-ja/ (accessed 10 October 2022).

48.

The Slovenian Press Agency (STA) (2021b) Philosopher loses professorship over sexual harassment allegations. STA, 3 February. Available at: https://english.sta.si/2863428/philosopher-loses-professorship-over-sexual-harassment-allegations (accessed 20 May 2024).

49.

Valenčič

(2023) 8 dni/teden: Neravnovesje obravnav spolnih zločinov. Mladina 49, 8 December. Available at: https://www.mladina.si/arhiv/202349/ (accessed 20 December 2023).

50.

Van Dijk

JAGM

(2006) The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media. 2nd ed. London: Sage.

51.

Vermeulen

(2022) Seksuele toestemming in het nieuwe seksueel strafrecht: onvolkomen, inconsistente en aarzelende progressive. In: Vermeulen

Byn

De Coensel

(eds) Seksuele Autonomie, Normativiteit, Exploitatie en Deviantie: Criminologische en Juridische Verkenningen. Antwerp: Gompel & Svacina, pp. 25–35.

52.

Volk

(2022) Gre samo zato, da smo začeli v družbi o nekaterih stvareh, o katerih smo prej molčali, govoriti nag las – Dr Jasna Podreka, sociologinja. Mladina 35: 37–41.

53.

Walklate

(2007) Imagining the Victim of Crime. Maidenhead; New York: Open University Press.

54.

Wemmers

J-A

(2010) The meaning of justice for victims. In: Shoham

Knepper

Kett

(eds) International Handbook of Victimology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 27–42.

55.

Wikström

P-O

(2006) Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In: Wikström

P-O

Sampson

(eds) The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms, and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–107.

56.

Wikström

P-O

(2010) Situational action theory. In: Cullen

Wilcox

(eds) Encyclopaedia of Criminological Theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 1001–1007.

57.

Ziegenhagen

(1977) Victims, Crime, and Social Control. New York: Praeger.