Crimes against humanity in Guinea have caused many thousands of deaths, the exile of countless individuals, and the rape of hundreds of women. Since its independence in 1958, Guinea has been ruled by various authoritarian regimes and experienced periods of grave violence, most notably from 1958 to 1984, under the rule of Sékou Touré and, more recently, in 2009, under the rule of Moussa Dadis Camara. While some effort has been made to address these crimes, victims continue to demand justice. This raises the question: what does justice mean for victims of crimes against humanity in Guinea? In this paper, we examine the meaning of justice for 31 Guinean victims of crimes against humanity. Using justice theory as a framework, we examine the perceptions and experiences of these victims regarding justice to promote reconciliation and lasting peace.
Action des Chrétiens pour l’Abolition de la Torture (ACAT-France) (2010) Rapport de l’ACAT-France: Un monde tortionnaire. Paris: ACAT.
2.
AdamsJS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: BerkowitzL (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 267–299.
3.
ArieffAMcGovernM (2013) ‘History is stubborn’: Talk about truth, justice, and national reconciliation in the Republic of Guinea. Comparative Studies in Society and History55(1): 198–225.
BarryB (2013). La Guinée: Les violences politiques en Guinée: Une pratique constante. In: VettovagliaJ (ed) Prévention des crises et promotion de la paix - Determinants des conflits et nouvelles formes de prévention. Bruxelles: Editions Bruylant, Volume III, 338–358.
6.
Bar-TalDHalperinEDe RiveraJ (2007) Collective emotions in conflict situation: Societal information. Journal of Social Issues63(2): 4414–4460.
7.
BladerSLTylerTR (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a ‘fair’ process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin29(6): 747–758.
8.
BloomfieldDBarnesTHuyseL (2003) Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook. Stockholm: IDEA.
9.
CarrPJLogioKAMaierS (2003) Keep me informed: What matters for victims as they navigate the juvenile criminal justice system in Philadelphia. International Review of Victimology10(2): 117–135.
10.
CharlesB (1989) Quadrillage politique et administratif des militaires? In: KARTHALA (ed) Politique Africaine 36 Guinéee l’après-Sékou Touré, ISSN 0244-7827, 9–21.
11.
ColquittJA (2001) On the dimensionality of organization justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology86(1): 386–400.
12.
Commission provisoire sur la réconciliation nationale (CPRN) (2016) Consultations nationales sur la réconciliation en Guinée – Rapport final. Available at: https://guinee7.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ici.pdf(accessed 15 December 2018).
13.
Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU (2009) Rapport de la Commission d’enquête internationale chargée d’établir les faits et les circonstances des événements du 28 septembre 2009 en Guinée. Available at: https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=fr/S/2009/693 (accessed 15 September 2014).
14.
De MesmaeckerV (2014) Perceptions of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Routledge.
15.
De RiveraJPaezD (2007) Emotional climate, human security, and cultures of peace. Journal of Social Issues63(2): 233–253.
16.
DeutschM (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues31(3): 137–149.
17.
DeutschM (1985) Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18.
DeutschM (2011) Justice and conflict. In: ColemanPT (ed.) Conflict, Interdependence and Justice: The Intellectual Legacy of Morton Deutsch. New York: Springer, 95–118.
19.
DialloA (1983) La mort de Diallo Tell, premier secrétaire général de l’O.U.A. Paris: Edition Karthala.
DwertmannE (2010) The Reparation System of the International Criminal Court. Leiden: Brill.
22.
Fédération des ligues des droits de l’homme (Fidh) (2010) Guinée-Conakry: 1 an après le massacre du 28 septembre 2009: Nouveau pouvoir, espoir de justice. FIDH.
23.
GomezAR (2007) Camp Boiro: Parler ou mourir. Guinée: L’Harmattan.
24.
GreenbergJ (1993) The social side of justice: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In: CropanzanoR (ed.) Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 79–103.
25.
HamptonJ (1992) An expressive theory of retribution. In: CraggW (ed.), Retributivism and its Critics. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 1–25.
26.
HeckathornDD (1997) Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems44(2): 174–199.
27.
HermanJL (2005) Justice from the victims’perspective. Violence Against Women11(5): 515–602.
28.
HolderR (2018) Just Interests: Victims, Citizens and the Potential for Justice. Glos, UK: Elgar Studies in Law and Society.
29.
HomansGC (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Oxford: Harcourt Brace.
30.
HoughMJacksonJBradfordB, et al. (2010) Procedural justice, trust and institutional legitimacy. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice4(3): 203–210.
HuoYJSmithHJTylerTR, et al. (1996) Superordinate identification, subgroup identification and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem, is assimilation the answer?Psychological Science7: 40–45.
36.
Institut National de Statistiques (2013) Perspectives démocratiques, ELEP 2012, RMDH 2013, LPNR/DDL2011. Available at: http://www.stat-guinee.org/ (accessed 9 April 2019).
Janoff-BulmanRSheikhS (2006) From national trauma to moralizing nation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology28(4): 325–332.
39.
JeanjeanM (2005) Sékou Touré: Un totalitarisme africain. Paris: L’Harmattan.
40.
JostJTBanajiM (1994) The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology33: 1–27.
41.
KosterNN (2018) Crime victims and the police: Crime victims’ evaluations of police behaviour, legitimacy, and cooperation: A multi-method study. Doctoral thesis, University of Leiden, E.M. Meijers Instituut.
42.
LambourneW (2009) Transitional justice and peacebuilding after mass violence. International Justice of Transitional Justice33(1): 28–48.
43.
LauferASolomonZ (2011) Posttraumatic growth in Israeli Jews. In: WeissTBergerR (eds) Posttraumatic Growth and Culturally Competent Practice. New York: Wiley, 15–30.
44.
LaxminarayanM (2012) Procedural justice and psychological effects of criminal proceedings: The moderating of offense type. Social Justice Research25(4): 390–405.
45.
Le VineVT (2004) Politics in Francophone Africa, Part 3: Structures, Processes, and Power. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
46.
LindEALissakRIConlonDE (1983) Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology13(4): 338–350.
47.
LindEATylerT (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
48.
ManirabonaAWemmersJ (2014) It’s doesn’t go away with time: Victims’ need for reparation following crimes against humanity. In: WemmersJ (ed.), Reparation for Victims of Crimes against Humanity: The Healing Role of Reparation. Abingdon: Routledge
49.
MeredithM (2005) The Fate of Africa. New York: Public Affairs.
MoriceF (2018) ‘À vous la parole’: Le récit perdu des années Sékou. In: BahMBaldéMSBarryA, et al. (eds) Mémoire collective: Une histoire plurielle des violences politiques en Guinée, 36–38.
52.
MorissetteMWemmersJ (2016) L’influence thérapeutique de la perception de justice informationnelle et interpersonnelle sur les symptômes de stress post-traumatique des victimes de crimes. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice58(1): 31–55.
53.
PirèsAP (1997) Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative: Essai théorique et méthodologique. In: PoupartJDeslauriersJ-PGroulxL-H, et al. (eds) La recherche qualitative: Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques. Boucherville: G. Morin, 113–172.
PunamakiR-J (2011) Posttraumatic growth in Middle Eastern context. In: WeissTBergerR (eds) Posttraumatic Growth and Culturally Competent Practice. New York: Wiley, 31–48.
56.
RaymondE (2010) Justice pour les crimes contre l’humanité: Point de vue et attentes des victimes. Master’s thesis. École de criminologie, Université de Montréal.
57.
SperfeldtC (2018) Practices of reparation in international criminal justice. Doctoral thesis, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Australia.
ThibautJWalkerL (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Wiley.
61.
TylerT (1989) The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(5): 830–838.
62.
TylerTR (2000) Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology35(2): 117–125.
63.
TylerTRLindEA (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. In: ZannaMP (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 115–191.
Van CampT (2014) Victims of Violence and Restorative Practices: Finding a Voice. Oxford: Routledge.
67.
Van den BosK (1996) Procedural justice and conflict. Doctoral thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.
68.
Van den BosK (2009). Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty, Psychological Inquiry20(4): 197–217.
69.
Van den BosKLindEA (2002) Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgements. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology34: 1–59.
70.
Van den BosKLindEAWilkeH (2001) The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In: CropanzanoR (ed.) Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 49–66.
71.
Van den BosKVermuntRWilkeHAM (1997) Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72(1), 95–104.
72.
Van der MerweH (2008) What survivors say about justice: An analysis of the TRC Victim Hearings. In: ChapmanAvan der MerweH (eds) Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Did the TRC Deliver?Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Publishers, 23–44.
73.
VidmarN (2001) Retribution and vengeance. In: SandersJHamiltonVL (eds) Handbook of Justice Research in Law. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, 1–63.
74.
WalsterEWalsterGWBerscheidE (1973) New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology25(2): 151–176.
75.
WemmersJ (1996) Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Amsterdam: Kugler.
76.
WemmersJ (1999) Victim notification and public support for the criminal justice system. International Review of Victimology6(2): 167–178.
77.
WemmersJ-AM (2017) Victimology: A Canadian Perspective. University of Toronto.
78.
WemmersJ (2018) Reparation, decolonization and international law: The healing role of reparation, Harvard International Law Journal59(1): 1–5.
79.
WemmersJCyrK (2006) What fairness means to crime victims: A social psychological perspective. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice2(2): 102–128.
80.
WemmersJManirabonaA (2014a) Regaining trust: The importance of justice for victims of crimes against humanity. International Review of Victimology20(1): 101–110.
81.
WemmersJManirabonaA (2014b) Defining victims: A proposed typology for victims of war crime. In: BantekasIMylonakiE (eds) Criminological Approaches to International Criminal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 316–337.
