The article examines how court professionals interact with and manage victims in the wake of victim participatory reforms instituted within an adversarial legal model. Analysis is based on an examination of interviews with legal and allied professionals (n = 36) and victims-turned-activists (n = 7) from four jurisdictions in a US state about their experiences following implementation of legislation that expanded victims’ participatory rights in legal proceedings. An examination of the strategies described in the interviews reveals that legal and allied professionals actively manage victims’ participation throughout the legal process by using creative means to protect them from the sometimes onerous effects of participation while also meeting institutional needs, albeit with varying levels of success. Four strategies—demystification, management of emotions, victim-shielding and strategic exclusion—are discussed and the limits to their efficacy are considered. Future theoretical and policy implications for the practice of victim participation in adversarial legal systems are also addressed.
BandesS (2009) Victims, ‘closure,’ and the sociology of emotion. Law and Contemporary Problems72(1): 1−26.
2.
BibasS (2006) Transparency and participation in criminal procedure. New York University Law Review81(3): 911–966.
3.
BibasS (2012) The Machinery of Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BierschbachRA (2007) Allocution and the purposes of victim participation under the CVRA. Federal Sentencing Reporter19(1): 44−48.
5.
BlondelEC (2008) Victims' rights in an adversary system. Duke Law Journal58: 237−274.
6.
BoothT (2012) ‘Cooling out’ victims of crime: Managing victim participation in the sentencing process in a superior sentencing court. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology45: 214−230.
7.
BottomsARobertsJV (2010) Hearing the Victim: Adversarial Justice, Crime Victims and the State. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
8.
CassellP (1999) Barbarians at the gates: A reply to the critics of the victims' rights amendment. Utah Law Review1999: 479−544.
9.
DavisRCAndersonJMHowleySDorrisCWhitmanJ (2012) No more rights without remedies: An impact evaluation of the national crime victim law institute’s victims’ rights clinics. Technical report, Arlington, VA: Rand Corporation.
10.
EdwardsI (2004) An ambiguous participant: The crime victim and criminal justice decision-making. British Journal of Criminology44: 967−982.
11.
EikenberryK (1987) Victims of crime/victims of justice. Wayne Law Review34(1): 29−50.
12.
EisensteinJJacobH (1977) Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
13.
EnglebrechtCM (2011) The struggle for ‘ownership of conflict’: An exploration of victim participation and voice in the criminal justice system. Criminal Justice Review36: 129–151.
14.
ErezE (1990) Victim participation in sentencing: Rhetoric and reality. Journal of Criminal Justice18(1): 19−31.
15.
ErezE (1994) Victim participation in sentencing: And the debate goes on …. International Review of Victimology3: 17−32.
16.
ErezE (1999) Who’s afraid of the Big Bad Victim: Victim impact statements as victim empowerment and enhancement of justice. Criminal Law Review1999(July): 545−556.
17.
ErezELasterK (1999) Neutralizing victim reform: Legal professionals’ perspectives on victims and impact statements. Crime and Delinquency45(4): 530−553.
18.
ErezERobertsJ (2013) Victim participation in criminal justice. In: DavisRCLurigioAHermanS (eds) Victims of Crime (4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 251−270.
19.
ErezERogersL (1999) Victim impact statements and sentencing outcomes and processes: The perspectives of legal professionals. British Journal of Criminology39(2): 216−239.
20.
ErezETontodonatoP (1992) Victim participation in justice and satisfaction with justice. Justice Quarterly9(3): 393−427.
21.
ErezEIbarraPRDownsDM (2011) Victim participation reforms in the United States and victim welfare: A therapeutic jurisdiction perspective. In: ErezEKilchlingMWemmersJ (eds) Victim Participation in Proceedings and Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
22.
FeeleyMM (1979) The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
FordDA (1991) Prosecution as a victim power resource: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law & Society Review25: 313−334.
24.
FordDA (2003) Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence18(6): 669−684.
25.
FrohmannL (1991) Discrediting victims' allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems38(2): 213−226.
26.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Doubleday.
28.
HannaC (1996) No right to choose: Mandated victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Harvard Law Review109: 1849−1910.
29.
HermanJL (2003) The mental health of crime victims: Impact of legal intervention. Crime and Delinquency33: 468–478.
30.
HochschildAR (2003) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
HolsteinJAMillerG (1990) Rethinking victimization: An interactional approach to victimology. Symbolic Interaction13(1): 103−122.
32.
KilpatrickDGOttoRK (1987) Constitutionally guaranteed participation in criminal proceedings for victims: Potential effects on psychological functioning. Wayne Law Review34(1): 7−28.
33.
MarquartJW (2005) Bringing victims in, but how far?Criminology and Public Policy4: 329−332.
34.
MertonRK (1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review1(6): 894−904.
35.
O’HaraEA (2005) Victim participation in the criminal process. Journal of Law and Policy13(1): 229−247.
36.
ParsonsJBerginT (2010) The impact of criminal justice involvement on victims’ mental health. Journal of Traumatic Stress23(2): 182–188.
37.
RobertsJ (2009) Listening to the crime victim. In: TonryM (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 347−365.
38.
SandersA (1999) Taking account of victims in the criminal justice system: A review of the literature. Research Findings No. 32. The Scottish Office Central Research Office, Edinburgh.
SchusterMLPropenAD (2011a) Degrees of emotion: Judicial responses to victim impact statements. Law, Culture and the Humanities6: 75−104.
41.
SchusterMLPropenAD (2011b) Victim Advocacy in the Courtroom. Lebanon, NH: University of New England Press.
42.
ShaplandJHallM (2010) Victims at court: Necessary accessories or centre stage? In: BottomsAERobertsJ (eds) Hearing the Victim: Adversarial Justice, Crime Victims and the State. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing, 163−199.
43.
WemmersJ (2013) Victim experiences with the criminal justice system and their recovery from crime. International Review of Victimology19(3): 221−233.
44.
WexlerD (2011) Therapeutic jurisprudence and victim participation in justice: A proposal for law school legal adviser clinics. In ErezEKilchlingMWemmersJ (eds) Victim Participation in Proceedings and Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
