This article examines secondary victimization and how the criminal justice system affects victims’ psychological recovery from the crime. Victim recovery was measured using the Modified Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scale (MPSSS). This study is prospective, following victims as their cases passed through the criminal justice system. How authorities treated victims was measured in terms of victims’ procedural justice judgements. Using a general linear model with repeated measures, unfair procedures were found to impact victims’ recovery. The article closes with a discussion of the findings and their implications.
BladerSLTylerT (2003) A four-component model of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin29(6): 747–758.
2.
BrickmanE (2003) Development of a National Study of Victim Needs and Assistance. Report submitted to the US Department of Justice. Award no. 98-VF-GX-0011.
3.
BrocknerJKonovskyMCooper-SchneiderRFolgerRChristopherMBiesRJ (1994) Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal37(2): 397–409.
4.
CalhounKSAtkesonBMResickPA (1982) A longitudinal examination of fear reactions in victims of rape. Journal of Counseling Psychology29(6): 655–661.
5.
CampbellRSeflTBarnesHEAhrensCEWascoSMZaragoza-DiesfeldY (1999) Community services for rape survivors: Enhancing psychological well-being or increasing trauma?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology67(6): 847–858.
6.
CampbellRWascoSMAhrensCESeflTBarnesHE (2001) Preventing the ‘second rape’. Journal of Interpersonal Violence16: 1239–1259.
7.
CarrPLogioKAMaierS (2003) Keep me informed. International Review of Victimology10(2): 117–136.
8.
ClussPABoughtonJFrankEStewartBDWestD (1983) The rape victim: Psychological correlates of participation in the legal process. Criminal Justice and Behavior10: 342–357.
9.
DavisRLurigioASkoganW (1997) Victims of Crime. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
10.
DoernerWLabS (2005) Victimology. Newark, NJ: Anderson Publishing.
11.
Du WorsR (2000) Trends in criminal justice. In: RobertsJ (ed.) Criminal Justice in Canada. Toronto: Harcourt Brace, 23–40.
12.
ErezEBelknapJ (1998) In their own words: Battered women’s assessment of the criminal processing system’s responses. Violence and Victims13(3): 251–268.
13.
FalsettiSAResnickHSResickPAKilpatrickDG (1993) The Modified PTSD Symptom Scale: A brief self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder. The Behavior Therapist16(June): 161–162.
14.
FrazierPAHaneyB (1996) Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior20(6): 607–628.
15.
GannonMMihoreanK (2005) Criminal victimization in Canada, 2004. Juristat25(7).
16.
GoodrumS (2007) Victims’ rights, victims’ expectations, and law enforcement workers’ constraints in cases of murder. Law & Social Inquiry32(3): 725–757.
17.
GuaySMarchandAIucciSMartinA (2002) Validation de la version québécoise de l’échelle modifiée des symptoms du trouble de stress post-traumatique auprès d’une échantillon clinique. Revue québécoise de psychologie23: 257–269.
18.
HaganJ (1983) Victims Before the Law. Toronto: Butterworths.
19.
HermanJL (2003) The mental health of crime victims: Impact of legal intervention. Journal of Traumatic Stress16: 159–166.
20.
HermanJL (2005) Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women11: 571–602.
21.
HolmstromLLBurgessAW (1978) The Victim of Rape: Institutional Reactions. New York: Wiley.
22.
HolmstromLLBurgessAW (1983) The Victim of Rape. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
23.
KilpatrickDAciernoR (2003) Mental health needs of crime victims: Epidemiology and outcome. Journal of Traumatic Stress16(2): 119–132.
24.
KilpatrickDSaundersBVeronenLBestCVonJ (1987) Criminal victimization: Lifetime prevalence, reporting to the police and psychological impact. Crime & Delinquency33(4): 479–489.
25.
McNallyRJBryantRAEhlersA (2003) Does early psychological intervention promote recovery from posttraumatic stress?Psychological Science in the Public Interest4: 45–79.
26.
MaguireM (1991) The needs and rights of victims of crime. In: TonryM (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of the Research, Volume 14. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 363–433.
27.
OrthU (2002) Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings. Social Justice Research15(4): 313–325.
28.
OrthUMaerckerA (2004) Do trials of perpetrators retraumatize crime victims?Journal of Interpersonal Violence19: 212–227.
29.
ResickP (1988) Reactions of Female and Male Victims of Rape or Robbery. Final Report, grant # 85-IJ-CX-0042. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
SalesEBaumMShoreB (1984) Victim readjustment following assault. Journal of Social Issues40(1): 117–136.
32.
ShaplandJWilmoreJDuffP (1985) Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Aldershot, GB: Gower Publishing Company Limited.
33.
StahlTVan ProoijenJWVermuntR (2004) On the psychology of procedural justice: Reactions to procedures of ingroup versus outgroup authorities. European Journal of Social Psychology34: 173–189.
34.
SunshineJTylerT (2003) Moral solidarity, identification with the community, and the importance of procedural justice: The police as prototypical representatives of a group’s moral value. Social Psychological Quarterly66(2): 153–165.
35.
SymondsM (1980) The ‘second injury’ to victims. Evaluation and Change, Special Issue36–38.
36.
Ten BoomAKuijpersKF (2007) Wat wil het slachtoffer? (What does the victim want?). Justitiële Verkenningen3(7): 39–49.
37.
ThibautJWalkerL (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Wiley.
38.
TylerT (1994) Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67(5): 850–863.
39.
TylerT (2000) Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology35(2): 117–125.
40.
TylerT (2003) Procedural justice, legitimacy and the effective rule of law. In: TonryM (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 30. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 257–283.
41.
TylerTBiesRJ (1990) Interpersonal aspects of procedural justice. In: CarrollJS (ed.) Applied Social Psychology in Business Settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 77–89.
42.
TylerTLindEA (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. In: ZannaMP (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25. San Diego: Academic Press, 115–191.
43.
Van den BosKLindEA (2002) Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgements. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology34: 1–59.
44.
Van den BosKLindEAWilkeH (2001) The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In: CropanzanoR (ed.) Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 49–66.
45.
VeronenLJKilpatrickDG (1980) Self-reported fears of rape victims: A preliminary investigation. Behavior Modification4: 383–396.
46.
WemmersJM (1996) Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Amsterdam: Kugler.
47.
WemmersJM (1999) Victim notification and public support for the criminal justice system. International Review of Victimology6(3): 167–178.
48.
WemmersJM (2003) Introduction à la victimologie. Montreal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
49.
WemmersJCyrK (2006) Victims’ Needs Within the Context of the Criminal Justice System. International Centre for Comparative Criminology, Université de Montréal, September.
50.
WilliamsJE (1984) Secondary victimization: Confronting public attitudes about rape. Victimology9: 66–81.
51.
XieMMcDowallD (2008) Escaping crime: The effects of direct and indirect victimization on moving. Criminology46(4): 809–840.
52.
ZechERiméB (2005) Is talking about an emotional experience helpful? Effects on emotional recovery and perceived benefits. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy12(4): 270–287.
