Restorative justice (RJ) promotes a constructive dialogue between the victim of a crime and the offender. Restorative practices have been credited for allowing victims to move on from victimization. This paper goes beyond victim appreciation of RJ and addresses what motivates victims to agree to communicate with their offender. Victim-participants were interviewed at the start of a restorative intervention and again after its conclusion, with the aim of identifying reasons for participation and exploring whether these evolve as a restorative procedure progresses. Discourses reveal that victims hoped that interaction with their adult or young offender would advance insight and healing as well as help the offender. Shifts in motivation over time were only subtle and many respondents manifested prosocial intentions (for example to help the offender) early on.
BogaertSBooneCDeclerckC (2008) Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology47(3): 453–480.
2.
CyrKWemmersJ-A (2011) Empowerment des victimes d’actes criminels. Criminologie44(2): 125–155.
3.
DeutschM (1975) Equity, equality, and need. What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?Journal of Social Issues31(3): 137–150.
4.
DoakJO’MahonyD (2006) The vengeful victim? Assessing the attitudes of victims participating in restorative youth conferencing. International Review of Victimology13(2): 157–177.
5.
European Union (2012) Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime. Official Journal of the European Union, L 315, 14November2012.
6.
FrazierPGreerCGabrielsenSTennenHParkCTomichP (2013) The relation between trauma exposure and prosocial behavior. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy5(3): 286–294.
7.
GehmJ (1998) Victim–offender mediation programs: An exploration of practice and theoretical frameworks. Western Criminology Review1(1) [online].
8.
GoodeyJ (2005) Victims and Victimology: Research, Policy and Practice. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
9.
GroenhuijsenM (2000) Victim–offender mediation: Legal and procedural safeguards. Experiments and legislation in some European jurisdictions. In: The European Forum for Victim–Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (ed.) Victim–Offender Mediation in Europe. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 69–83.
10.
GrossmanFKSorsoliLKia-KeatingM (2006) A gale force wind: Meaning making by male survivors of childhood sexual abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry76(4): 434–443.
11.
HallM (2009) Victims of Crime. Policy and Practice in Criminal Justice. Abingdon: Routledge.
12.
HermanJL (2003) The mental health of crime victims: Impact of legal intervention. Journal of Traumatic Stress16(2): 159–166.
13.
Janoff-BulmanR (1992) Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. New York: Free Press.
14.
KilpatrickDGAciernoR (2003) Mental health needs of crime victims: Epidemiology and outcomes. Journal of Traumatic Stress16(2): 119–132.
15.
LaxminarayanM (2014) Accessibility and Initiation of Restorative Justice. Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice.
16.
LindEATylerT (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
17.
LindEAVan den BosK (2002) When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior24(2002): 181–223.
18.
McClintockCGAllisonST (1989) Social value orientation and helping behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology19(4): 353–362.
19.
McCulloughME (2008) Beyond Revenge. The Evolution of the Forgiveness Instinct. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
MiersD (2012) Restorative justice and victim–offender mediation in the United Kingdom. In: MiersDAertsenI (eds) Regulating Restorative Justice: A Comparative Study of Legislative Provision in European Countries. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft, 420–510.
21.
O’NeillA (2000) Honouring survival: Is there a rule book? Bachelor’s thesis, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.
22.
ReevesHDunnP (2010) The status of crime victims and witnesses in the twenty-first century. In: BottomsARobertsJV (eds) Hearing the Victim. Adversarial Justice, Crime Victims and the State. London: Routledge, 46–71.
23.
RossnerM (2008) Healing victims and offenders and reducing crime: A critical assessment of restorative justice practice and theory. Sociology Compass2(6): 1734–1749.
24.
ShaplandJRobinsonGSorsbyA (2011) Restorative Justice in Practice. London: Routledge.
25.
StaubEVollhardtJ (2008) Altruism born of suffering: The roots of caring and helping after victimization and other trauma. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry78(3): 267–280.
26.
StrangH (2002) Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27.
StrangHShermanL (2003) Repairing the harm: Victims and restorative justice. Utah Law Review15(1): 15–42.
28.
SturgesJEHanrahanKJ (2004) Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research4(1): 107–118.
29.
ThibautJWalkerL (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30.
UmbreitMSVosBCoatesRBArmourMP (2006) Victims of severe violence in mediated dialogue with offender: The impact of the first multi-site study in the U.S. International Review of Victimology13(1): 27–48.
31.
Van CampT (2014) Victims of Violence and Restorative Practices. Finding a Voice. London: Routledge.
32.
Van CampTDe MesmaeckerV (2014) Procedural justice for victims of crime: Are victim impact statements and victim–offender mediation rising to the challenge? In: VanfraechemIPembertonAFelixN (eds) Justice for Victims. Perspectives on Rights, Transition and Reconciliation. London: Routledge, 277–299.
33.
Van CampTDe SouterV (2012) Belgium. In: MiersDAertsenI (eds) Regulating Restorative Justice: A Comparative Study of Legislative Provision in European Countries. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft, 60–100.
34.
Van CampTWemmersJ-A (2013) Victim satisfaction with restorative justice: More than simply procedural justice. International Review of Victimology19(2): 117–143.
35.
Van CampTWemmersJ-A (2016) Victims’ reflections on the proactive and protective approach to the offer of restorative justice: The importance of information. Accepted for publication in theCanadian Journal for Criminology and Criminal Justice.
36.
Van den BosK (2009) Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory20(4): 197–217.
37.
Van den BosKLindEA (2001) The psychology of own versus others’ treatment: Self-oriented and other-oriented effects on perceptions of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(10): 1324–1333.
38.
Van ProoijenJ-WStåhlTEekDVan LangePAM (2012) Injustice for all or just for me? Social value orientation predicts responses to own versus other’s procedures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38(10): 1247–1258.
39.
VollhardtJR (2009) Altruism born of suffering and prosocial behavior following adverse life events: A review and conceptualization. Social Justice Research22(1): 53–97.
40.
WemmersJ-A (2002) Restorative justice. The choice between bilateral decision-making power and third party intervention. In:WilliamsB (ed.) Reparation and Victim-Focused Social Work. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 34–44.
41.
WemmersJ-A (2011) Victims in the criminal justice system and therapeutic jurisprudence: A Canadian perspective. In: ErezEKilchlingMWemmersJ-A (eds) Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Victim Participation in Justice. International Perspectives. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 67–85.
42.
WemmersJ-A (2013) Victims’ experiences in the criminal justice system and their recovery from crime. International Review of Victimology19(3): 221–233.
43.
WemmersJ-ACanutoM (2002) Expériences, attentes et perceptions des victimes à l’égard de la justice réparatrice: Analyse documentaire critique. Ottawa: Ministère de la Justice Canada.
44.
WemmersJ-ACyrK (2005) Can mediation be therapeutic for crime victims? An evaluation of victims’ experiences in mediation with young offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice47(3): 527–544.
45.
WemmersJ-ACyrK (2006) What fairness means to crime victims: A social psychological perspective on victim–offender mediation. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice2(2): 102–128.
46.
WemmersJ-AVan der LeedenRSteensmaH (1995) What is procedural justice: Criteria used by Dutch victims to assess the fairness of criminal justice procedures. Social Justice Research8(4): 329–350.
47.
ZehrHMikaH (1998) Fundamental concepts of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review1(1): 47–55.
48.
ZinsstagETeunkensMPaliB (2011) Conferencing: A Way Forward for Restorative Justice in Europe. Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice.
