In this paper we attempt to examine the role of electronic space and its intersection with young women's lives. The article investigates the internet use/abuse of women as embedded in the power structure and the ways it reshapes gender relations and re-constructs women's victimization. In an attempt to expand our understanding of the victimological and criminological implications of the internet for females our case study focuses particularly on how young Palestinian women living in a conflict zone experience the internet, and questions whether and how the internet could become a tool for misuse, abuse and the production of new crimes that might victimize women in conflict zones. The research is based on empirical evidence collected from Palestinian college women and mental health workers. Our findings show that the internet is perceived as a contested site — although internet use reproduces masculinity and hierarchies of power and is used as a tool of further control, oppression, punishment or abuse, it also enables Palestinian women to engage in new forms of contestation, both on the socio-political and economic level.
AdamA.GreenE. (1998). Gender, Agency, Location and the New Information Society. In Cyberspace Divide (LoaderB., ed.) pp. 83–97. Routledge; London.
2.
AdamsM.S.OyeJ.ParkerT.S. (2003). Sexuality of Older Adults and the Internet: From Sex Education to Cybersex. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18, 405–415.
3.
BarakA. (2005). Sexual Harassmenton the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 23 (1), 77–92.
4.
BarakA.Boniel-NissimM.SulerJ. (2008). Fostering Empowerment in Online Support Groups. Computers in Human behavior, 24 (5), 1867–1883.
5.
BarakA.FisherW.A. (2003). Experience with an Internet-based, Theoretically Grounded Educational Resource for the Promotion of Sexual and Reproductive Health. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18, 293–308.
6.
BarakatH. (2001). Arab Society in the 21st Century. Arab Unity Center; Beirut.
7.
Barzilai-NahonK.BarzilaiG. (2005). Cultured Technology: Internet and Religious Fundamentalism. The Information Society, 21 (1),25–40.
8.
BimberB. (2000). Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81 (3), 868–876.
9.
BlacklockC.CrosbyA. (2004).The Sounds of Silence: Feminist Research Across Timein Guatemala. In Sites of Violence: Gender and Conflict Zones (GilesW.HyndmanJ. ,eds) pp. 45–74. University of California; Berkeley.
10.
CampbellH. (2007). Who's Got the Power? Religious Authority and the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1043–1062.
11.
CockburnC.Furst-DilicR. (eds) (2004).Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe. Open University Press; Celtic Court, Buckingham.
12.
DamsenJ. (2007). The Media Mural Project: Empowering Youth in New Mass Media. Journal for Learning Through the Arts: A Research Journal on Arts Integration in Schools and Communities, 3 (1), Article 11, http://repositories.cdlib.org/cita/lta/vol3/iss1/art11c.
DoringN. (2000). Feminist Views of Cybersex: Victimization, Liberation, and Empowerment. Cyber Psychology & behavior, 3 (5), 863–884.
15.
EnloeC. (1993). The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. University of California Press; Berkeley.
16.
EnloeC. (2000). Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives. University of California Press; Berkeley and Los Angeles.
17.
EnloeC. (2007). Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.; New York.
18.
FinnJ.BanachM. (2000). Victimization Online: The Downside of Seeking Human Services for Women on the Internet, Cyber Psychology & behavior, 3 (2), 243–254.
19.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon Books; New York.
20.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books; New York.
21.
GanayemO.SheizafR.AzaizaF. (2009). Digital Divide: Internet Usage within Israeli Arab Society. Megamot, 164–196(In Hebrew).
22.
GilesW.M.HyndmanJ. (eds.) (2004). Sites of Violence: Gender and Conflict Zones. University of California Press; Berkeley and Los Angeles.
23.
GlaserB.StraussA.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine; Chicago.
24.
Hajazi-OmriH.RibakR. (2009). I Hugged my Mobile Each Night and Waited: The Mobile Phone in the Lives of Teenage Palestinian Girls in Israel, Megamot, 197–221(In Hebrew).
25.
HargittaiE.ShaferS. (2006). Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender. Social Science Quarterly, 1–26.
26.
HasanM. (1999). The Politics of Honor. In Sex, Gender, Politics: Women in Israel (IzraeliD., eds.) pp. 267–306. Hakibbutz Hameuchad; Tel Aviv. (In Hebrew).
HughesD.M. (2001). Globalization, Information Technology, and Sexual Exploitation of Women and Children. Rain and Thunder —A Radical Feminist Journal of Discussion and Activism, 1–3.
29.
JacksonL.A.ErvinK.S.GardnerP.D.SchmittN. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching. Sex Roles, 44 (5–6), 363–379.
30.
JerinR.DolinskyB. (2001). You've Got Mail! You Don't Want It: Cyber-Victimization and On-line Dating. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 9 (1), 15–21.
31.
JoinerR.GavinJ.DuffieldJ.BrosnanM.CrookC.DurndellA.MarasP.MillerJ.ScottA.LovattP. (2005). Gender, Internet Identification, and Internet Anxiety: Correlates of Internet Use. Cyber Psychology & behavior, 8 (4), 371–378.
32.
JoinerR.LittletonK.ChouC.Morahan-MartinJ. (2006). Gender and Information Communication Technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 317–319.
33.
Khoury-MachoolM. (2007). Palestinian Youth and Political Activism: The Emerging Internet Culture and New Modes of Resistance. Policy Futures in Education, 5 (1), 17–36.
34.
LimM. (2003). From War-net to Net-war: The Internet and Resistance Identities in Indonesia. International Information and Library Review, 35, 233–248.
35.
Lynn GossettJ.ByrneS. (2002). “Click Here”: A Content Analysis of Internet Rape Sites. Gender and Society, 16 (5), 689–709.
36.
MacKinnonC.A. (1994). Rape, Genocide, and Women's Human Rights. In Mass Rape: The War Against Women in Boznia-Herzegovina (StiglmayerA., ed.) pp. 183–196. University of Nebraska Press; Lincoln, Nebraska.
37.
McGertyL.J. (2000). “Nobody Lives Only in Cyberspace”: Gendered Subjectivities and Domestic Use of the Internet. Cyber Psychology & behavior, 3 (5), 895–899.
38.
Morahan-MartinJ. (2000). Women and the Internet: Promise and Perils. Cyber Psychology & behavior, 3 (5), 683–691.
NaiL.KirkupG. (2007). Gender and Cultural Differences in Internet Use: A Study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 48, 301–317.
42.
OnoH. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 1–20.
43.
SassenS. (1999). Digital Networks and Power. In Spaces of Culture: City-nation-world (FeatherstoneM.LashS., eds) pp. 49–63. Sage Publications; London.
44.
SassenS. (2002). Towards a Sociology of Information Technology. Current Sociology, 50 (3), 365–388.
45.
SayighR. (1979). Palestinians: From Peasants to Revolutionaries. Zed Press; London.
46.
ShadeL.R. (1998). A Gendered Perspective on Access to the Information Infrastructure. The Information Society, 14 (1), 33–44.
47.
Shalhoub-KevorkianN. (2005). Voice Therapy for Women Aligned with Political Prisoners: A Case Study of Trauma among Palestinian Women in the Second Intifada. Social Service Review, 79, 322–343.
48.
Shalhoub-KevorkianN. (2008). The Gendered Nature of Education under Siege: A Palestinian Feminist Perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27 (2), 179–200.
49.
Shalhoub-KevorkianN. (2009). Militarization and Violence against Women in Conflict Zones in the Middle East: A Palestinian Case-Study. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK.
50.
ShapiroS. (1998). Places and Spaces: The Historical Ineraction of Technology, Home, and Privacy: Social Construction of Privacy. The Information Society, 14 (4), 275–284.
51.
ShermanR.EndC.KraanE.ColeA.CampbellJ.BirchmeierZ.KlausnerJ. (2000). The Internet Gender Gap Among College Students: Forgotten but Not Gone?Cyber Psychology & behavior, 3 (5), 885–894.
52.
SinghS. (2001). Gender and the Use of the Internet at Home. New Media Society, 3, 395–415.
53.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK.
TarakiL. (ed.) (2006). Living Palestine: Family Survival, Resistance, and Mobility under Occupation. Syracuse University Press; New York.
56.
WassermanI.R.Richmond-AbbottM. (2005). Gender and the Internet: Causes of Variation in Access, Level, and Scope of Use. Social Science Quarterly, 86 (1), 252–270.
57.
WeiserE.B. (2000). Gender Differences in Internet Use Patterns and Internet Application Preferences: A Two-Sample Comparison. Cyber Psychology & behavior, 3 (2), 167–178.
58.
WheelerD.L. (2001). The Internet and Public Culture in Kuwait. International Communication Gazette, 63, 187–201.
59.
WheelerD.L. (2006). Gender Sensitivity and the Drive for IT: Lessons from the Net-Corps Jordan Project. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 131–142.
60.
WheelerD.L. (2007). Empowerment Zones? Women, Internet Cafés, and Life Transformations in Egypt. Information Technologies and International Development, 4 (2), 89–104.
