The task of delineating an appropriate role for the victim in the criminal justice system has been the subject of considerable debate in academia and policy circles for some time. While victim participation is considered something of a sine qua non of the restorative paradigm, many commentators remain sceptical of victim input in conventional sentencing on the grounds that it may lead to the imposition of overly harsh or onerous obligations. Drawing on evidence from a major evaluation of youth conferencing in Northern Ireland, this article challenges the assumption that victims are essentially punitive parties, and calls for a rethink of some of the fundamental values and assumptions that have traditionally resulted in their exclusion and even alienation in the criminal justice system.
AbramovskyA. (1992). Victim Impact Statements: Adversely Impacting upon Judicial Fairness. St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, 21–33.
2.
AshworthA. (1993). Some Doubts About Restorative Justice. Criminal Law Forum, 4, 277–299.
3.
AshworthA. (2000). Victims' Rights, Defendants' Rights and Criminal Procedure. In Integrating a Victim Perspective within Criminal Justice (CrawfordA.GoodeyJ., eds) pp. 185–206. Ashgate; Aldershot.
4.
BraithwaiteJ. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press; Oxford.
5.
BraithwaiteJ. (2003). Principles of Restorative Justice. In Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? (Von HirschA.RobertsJ.BottomsA.E.RoachK.SchiffM., eds) pp. 1–20. Hart; Oxford.
6.
BraithwaiteJ.DalyK. (1994). Masculinities, Violence, and Communitarian Control. In Just Boys Doing Business? (NewburnT.StankoE.A., eds) pp. 189–213. Routledge; New York.
7.
BrienenM.HoegenE. (2000). Victims of Crime in 22 European Criminal Justice Systems: The Implementation of Recommendation (85) II. Wolf Legal Production; Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
8.
BurumaY. (2004). Doubts on the Upsurge of the Victim's Role in Criminal Law. In Crime, Victims, and Justice: Essays on Principles and Practice (KapteinH.MaischM., eds) pp. 1–15. Ashgate; Aldershot.
9.
CampbellC.DevlinR.O'MahonyD.DoakJ.JacksonJ.CorriganT.McEvoyK. (2006). Evaluation of the Northern Ireland Youth Conference Service. NIO Research and Statistics Series: Report No. 12. Northern Ireland Office; Belfast.
10.
CavadinoM.DignanJ. (1997). Reparation, Retribution and Rights. International Review of Victimology, 4, 233.
11.
ChristieN. (1977). Conflicts as Property. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 1–19.
12.
CrawfordA.NewburnT. (2003). Youth Offending and Restorative Justice: Implementing Reform in Youth Justice. Willan; Cullompton.
13.
DignanJ. (2003). Towards a Systematic Model of Restorative Justice. In Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? (Von HirschA.RobertsJ.BottomsA.E.RoachK.SchiffM., eds) pp. 135–156. Hart; Oxford.
14.
DignanJ. (2005). Understanding Victims and Restorative Justice. Open University Press / McGraw-Hill; Maidenhead.
15.
DoakJ. (2005). Victims' Rights in Criminal Trials: Prospects for Participation. Journal of Law and Society, 32, 2924–316.
16.
DuffA. (2003). Restoration and Retribution. In Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? (Von HirschA.RobertsJ.BottomsA.E.RoachK.SchiffM., eds) pp. 43–60. Hart; Oxford.
17.
ErezE. (1999). Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Victim? Victim Impact Statements as Victim Empowerment and Enhancement of Justice. Criminal Law Review, 545–556.
18.
ErezE.RoegerL.MorganF. (1997). Victim Harm, Impact Statements and Victim Satisfaction with Justice: An Australian Experience. International Review of Victimology, 5, 37–60.
19.
ErezE.TontodonatoP. (1992). Victim Participation in Sentencing and Satisfaction with Justice. Justice Quarterly, 9, 393–417.
20.
FattahE. (2004). Gearing Justice Action to Victim Satisfaction — Contrasting Two Justice Philosophies: Retribution and Redress. In Crime, Victims, and Justice: Essays on Principles and Practice (KapteinH.MaischM., eds) pp. 16–30. Ashgate; Aldershot.
21.
FaulknerD. (2001). Crime, State and Citizen. Waterside Press; Winchester.
22.
FindlayM.HenhamR. (2005). Transforming International Criminal Justice: Retributive and Restorative Justice in the Trial Process. Willan; Cullompton.
23.
GoodeyJ. (2005). Victims and Victimology: Research, Policy and Practice. Longman; Harlow.
24.
GroenhuijsenM. (2004). Victims' Rights and Restorative Justice: Piecemeal Reform of the Criminal Justice System or a Change of Paradigm? In Crime, Victims, and Justice: Essays on Principles and Practice (KapteinH.MaischM., eds) pp. 63–79. Ashgate; Aldershot.
25.
HainesK.O'MahonyD. (2006). Restorative Approaches, Young People and Youth Justice. In Youth Crime and Justice (GoldsonB.MuncieJ., eds) pp. 110–124. Sage Publications; London.
26.
HallD.J. (1991). Victims' Voices in Criminal Court: The Need for Restraint. American Criminal Law Review, 28, 233–266.
27.
HoughM.ParkA. (2002). How Malleable are Attitudes to Crime and Punishment? Findings from a British Deliberative Poll. In Changing Attitudes to Punishment (RobertsJ.HoughM., eds) pp. 163–183. Willan; Cullompton.
28.
HoyleC. (2002). Securing Restorative Justice for the Non-participating Victim. In New Visions of Crime Victims (HoyleC.YoungR., eds) pp. 97–131. Hart; Oxford.
29.
HoyleC.YoungR.HillR. (2002). Proceed with Caution: An Evaluation of the Thames Valley Police Initiative in Restorative Cautioning. Rowntree; York.
30.
HudsonB. (1998). Restorative Justice: The Challenge of Sexual and Racial Violence. Journal of Law and Society, 25, 237–256.
31.
LederachJ.P. (1998). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. United States Institute of Peace; Washington D.C.
32.
MattinsonJ.Mirrlees-BlackC. (2000). Attitudes to Crime and Criminal Justice: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey. Home Office RDS; London.
MayhewP.Van KesterenJ. (2002). Cross-national Attitudes to Punishment. In Changing Attitudes to Punishment (Roberts and HoughM., eds) pp. 63–92. Willan; Cullompton.
35.
MorrisA.GelsthorpeL. (2000). Re-visioning Men's Violence against Female Partners. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 412–428.
36.
MiersD.MaguireM.GoldieS.SharpeK.HaleC.NetternA.UglowS.DoolinK.HallamA.EnterkinJ.NewburnT. (2001). An Exploratory Evaluation of Restorative Justice Schemes. Home Office: Crime Reduction Research Series Paper 9. Home Office; London.
37.
MooreD.B. (1994). A New Approach to Juvenile Justice: An Evaluation of Family Conferencing in Wagga Wagga. A report to the Australian Criminology Research Council. Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University — Riverina; Wagga Wagga, Australia.
38.
MorrisA.MaxwellG.RobertsonJ. (1993). Giving Victims a Voice: A New Zealand Experiment. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 302–321.
39.
NewburnT.CrawfordA.EarleR.GoldieS.HaleC.HallamA.MastersG.NettenA.SaundersR.SharpeK.UglowS. (2002). The Introduction of Referral Orders into the Youth Justice System: Final Report. HORS 242. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics; London.
40.
Northern Ireland Office (2004). Victims' and Witnesses' Views on Their Treatment in the Criminal Justice System. NIO Research and Statistics Series: Report No. 10. Northern Ireland Office; Belfast.
41.
O'MahonyD.DoakJ. (2004). Restorative Justice: Is More Better?Howard Journal, 43, 484–505.
42.
PopovskiV. (2000). The International Criminal Court: A Synthesis of Retributive and Restorative Justice. International Relations, 15, 1–10.
43.
RockP. (1993). The Social World of an English Crown Court. Clarendon; Oxford.
ShaplandJ. (2003). Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Just Responses to Crime? In Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? (Von HirschA.RobertsJ.BottomsA.E.RoachK.SchiffM., eds) pp. 195–218. Hart; Oxford.
46.
ShaplandJ.WillmoreJ.DuffP. (1985). Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Gower; Aldershot.
47.
ShaplandJ.AtkinsonA.ColledgeE. (2004). Implementing Restorative Justice Schemes (Crime Reduction Programme): A Report on the First Year. Home Office On-line Report 32/04, available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr3204.pdf [18 May 2006].
48.
StrangH. (2002). Repair or Revenge? Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford University Press; Oxford.
49.
TuftsJ.RobertsJ. (2002). Sentencing Juvenile Offenders: Comparing Public Prejudices and Judicial Practice. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 46–64.
50.
Victim Support (1996). Women, Rape and the Criminal Justice System. Victim Support; London.
51.
WalgraveL. (2002). Restorative Justice and the Law: Socio-Ethical and Juridical Foundations for a Systemic Approach. In Restorative Justice and the Law (WalgraveL., ed.). Willan; Cullompton.
52.
WemmersJ. (2002). Restorative Justice for Victims of Crime: A Victim-Orientated Approach to Restorative Justice. International Review of Victimology, 9, 43–59.
53.
WilcoxA.YoungR.HoyleC. (2004). Two-year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions. Home Office Report 57.04. Home Office; London.
54.
WilliamsB. (2005). Victims of Crime and Community Justice. Jessica Kingsley; London.
55.
ZehrH. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Herald Press; Scottdale, PA.
56.
ZehrH.MikaH. (1998). Fundamental Concepts of Restorative Justice. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice, 1, 47–56.
