Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We undertook a postal survey of hospices and home-care services in the UK, to describe the use of portable syringe drivers in such units, their perceived clinical indications and disadvantages and the rules governing their use. Considerable agreement was found among hospice, combined and home-care units concerning the importance of portable syringe drivers in the treatment of patients with vomiting, intestinal obstruction and dysphagia. Home-care teams in particular perceived the benefits of an alternative route for analgesia. Combined units actually used more portable syringe drivers despite reporting more disadvantages to patients, staff and carers. Doctors most often made the decision to commence treatment with a portable syringe driver, often at the suggestion of a nurse. Doctors were also responsible in most instances, for the prescription of the rate of delivery, but nurses usually carried out the tasks of drawing up the infusion and inserting the needle. The presence of other rules did not seem to diminish the number of syringe drivers in use.

Keywords

attitude of health personnel evaluation studies infusion pumps palliative treatment parenteral infusions subcutaneous injections

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Russell Psb. Analgesia in terminal malignant disease. Br Med J 1979; 1: 1561.

Wright BM , Callan K. Slow drug infusions using a portable syringe driver. Br Med J 1979; 2: 582.

Campbell CF , Mason JB , Weiler JM Continuous subcutaneous infusion of morphine for the pain of terminal malignancy . Ann Intern Med 1983; 98: 51-52.

Dickson RJ , Russell Psb. Continuous subcutaneous analgesics for terminal care at home. Lancet 1982; 2: 165.

Regnard C. , Newbury A. Pain and the portable syringe pump. Nursing Times 1983; 79 (26): 25-28.

Oliver DJ The use of the syringe driver in terminal care. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1985 ; 20: 515-16.

Baines M. , Oliver DJ , Carter RL Medical management of intestinal obstruction in patients with advanced malignant disease. Lancet 1985 ; 2: 990-93.

Auty B. , Protheroe DT Syringe pumps: a review. British Journal of Parenteral Therapy 1986; May/June: 72-77.

Nicholson H. The success of the syringe driver. Nursing Times 1986; 82 (28): 49-51.

10.

Hawkett S. , Nicholson R.

Syringe drivers. J Dist

Nursing 1987; 5 (8): 4-6.

11.

Latham J. Syringe drivers in pain control. Professional Nurse 1987; April: 207-9.

12.

Dover SB Syringe driver in terminal care. Br Med J 1987; 294: 553-55.

13.

Notcutt WG Syringe driver in terminal care. Br Med J 1987; 294: 773-74.

14.

Snadden D. Syringe driver in terminal care. Br Med J 1987 ; 294: 906.

15.

Dickson RJ , Russell Psb. Syringe driver in terminal care. Br Med J 1987; 294: 1419.

16.

Oliver DJ Syringe drivers in palliative care: a review. Palliative Medicine 1988; 2: 21-26.

17.

Milner PC , Harper R. , Williams BT Ownership, availability and use of portable syringe drivers among hospice and home-care services. Sheffield: Medical Care Research Unit, Sheffield Medical School, 1988 .

18.

St Luke's Domiciliary Team. Use of the syringe driver. Sheffield: St Luke's Nursing Home, 1986.

19.

Twycross RG , Lack SA Symptom control in far advanced cancer: pain relief. London : Pitman, 1983.

20.

St Christopher's Hospice Information Service. Directory of hospice services. London : Hospice Information Service, 1987 .

21.

Hutchinson HT , Leedham GD , Knight AM Continuous subcutaneous analgesics and antiemetics in domiciliary terminal care. Lancet 1981; 2: 1279.

What do palliative-care workers think about portable syringe drivers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References