Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2025
Effectiveness of and implementation requirements for telehealth in palliative care patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Telehealth is being integrated with palliative care for patients with advanced cancer to improve access to specialized palliative care. However, its effectiveness and implementation requirements in palliative care remain unclear.
Aim:
This study evaluates the effectiveness of and implementation requirements for telehealth in palliative care patients with advanced cancer.
Design:
This was designed as a systematic review and meta-analysis with narrative synthesis (registered; CRD42024581786). The effects on patients’ quality of life, symptom burden, and depression were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. A narrative synthesis was conducted for all included studies.
Data sources:
MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in September 2025. Eligible studies comprised controlled trials, observational studies, and qualitative studies involving adults with advanced cancer who received telehealth in palliative care.
Results:
Of the 4232 records screened, 42 met the inclusion criteria, and six were eligible for meta-analysis. Telehealth interventions primarily involved videoconferencing, telephone, or text-based communication. Telehealth in palliative care demonstrated significant improvement in quality of life (standardized mean difference: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.09-1.53) and reduction in symptom burden (standardized mean difference: −1.44; 95% CI: −2.24 to −0.65) but had no significant effects on depression. Implementation requirements included trained multiprofessional teams, accessible digital infrastructure, sustainable reimbursement mechanisms, and standardized outcome measurements.
Conclusions:
Telehealth in palliative care may help improve quality of life and alleviate symptom burden among patients with advanced cancer. Future research should identify optimal delivery models and examine equity-related barriers to support wider implementation and policy development.
GuptaAJohnsonWVHendersonNL, et al. Patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives on the time burdens of cancer care. JAMA Netw Open2024; 7(11): e2447649.
2.
YuJARayKNParkSY, et al. System-level factors associated with use of outpatient specialty palliative care among patients with advanced cancer. J Oncol Pract2018; 15(1): e10–e19.
3.
ShihKKArechigaABChenX, et al. Telehealth preferences among patients with advanced cancer in the post COVID-19 vaccine era. J Pain Symptom Manag2024; 67(6): 525–534.e1.
4.
GreerJATemelJSEl-JawahriA, et al. Telehealth vs in-person early palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer: a multisite randomized clinical trial. JAMA2024; 332: 1153–1164.
5.
SteindalSANesAAGGodskesenTE, et al. Patients’ experiences of telehealth in palliative home care: scoping review. J Med Internet Res2020; 22(5): e16218.
6.
BaschEDealAMKrisMG, et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol2016; 34(6): 557–565.
7.
CaltonBShibleyWPCohenE, et al. Patient and caregiver experience with outpatient palliative care telemedicine visits. Palliat Med Rep2020; 1(1): 339–346.
8.
YangXLiXJiangS, et al. Effects of telemedicine on informal caregivers of patients in palliative care: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2024; 12: e54244.
9.
Middleton-GreenLGadoudANorrisB, et al. ‘A friend in the corner’: supporting people at home in the last year of life via telephone and video consultation-an evaluation. BMJ Support Palliat Care2019; 9(4): e26.
10.
LomenickAFKuhlmanSJBarnesJL, et al. Economics of using telemedicine to supplement hospice care in rural areas. J Palliat Med2021; 24(10): 1461–1466.
11.
HaydonHMSnoswellCLThomasEE, et al. Enhancing a community palliative care service with telehealth leads to efficiency gains and improves job satisfaction. J Telemed Telecare2021; 27(10): 625–630.
12.
MathewsJJChowRWennbergE, et al. Telehealth palliative care interventions for patients with advanced cancer: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer2023; 31(8): 451.
13.
SebastianSAShahYArseneC.Effectiveness of integrated palliative care telehealth intervention in patients with chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Probl Cardiol2024; 49(9): 102685.
14.
ZhengYHeadBASchapmireTJ.A systematic review of telehealth in palliative care: caregiver outcomes. Telemed J E Health2016; 22(4): 288–294.
15.
BradfordNArmfieldNRYoungJ, et al. The case for home based telehealth in pediatric palliative care: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care2013; 12: 4.
16.
SteindalSANesAAGGodskesenTE, et al. Advantages and challenges of using telehealth for home-based palliative care: systematic mixed studies review. J Med Internet Res2023; 25: e43684.
17.
GroomLLMcCarthyMMStimpfelAW, et al. Telemedicine and telehealth in nursing homes: an integrative review. J Am Med Dir Assoc2021; 22(9): 1784–1801.e7.
18.
GhazalKYSingh BeniwalSDhingraA.Assessing telehealth in palliative care: a systematic review of the effectiveness and challenges in rural and underserved areas. Cureus2024; 16(8): e68275.
19.
KirbyAGriffinDHeavinC, et al. Telehealth adoption in palliative care: a systematic review of patient barriers and facilitators. BMC Palliat Care2025; 24(1): 52.
20.
KrieckemansLCavoloACasaerM, et al. Telehealth in palliative care settings: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. Palliat Med. Epub ahead of print 2025. DOI: 10.1177/02692163251360115
21.
NwosuAC.Telehealth requires improved evidence to achieve its full potential in palliative care. Palliat Med2023; 37(7): 896–897.
22.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021; 372: n71.
23.
HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJ, et al. (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5 (updated August 2024). Cochrane, 2024. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (accessed 14 April 2025).
24.
FinucaneAMO’DonnellHLugtonJ, et al. Digital health interventions in palliative care: a systematic meta-review. NPJ Digit Med2021; 4(1): 64.
KavalieratosDCorbelliJZhangD, et al. Association between palliative care and patient and caregiver outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA2016; 316(20): 2104–2114.
27.
FerrellBRTwaddleMLMelnickA, et al. National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care Guidelines, 4th edition. J Palliat Med2018; 21(12): 1684–1689.
HaunMWEstelSRückerG, et al. Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2017; 6(6): CD011129.
30.
GomesBCalanzaniNCurialeV, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 2013: CD007760.
31.
SterneJACSavovićJPageMJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ2019; 366: l4898.
32.
HigginsJPTMorganRLRooneyAA, et al. A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E). Environ Int2024; 186: 108602.
33.
HigginsJPThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ2003; 327(7414): 557–560.
34.
Alcalde CastroMJZaigSNissimR, et al. Telehealth outpatient palliative care in the COVID-19 pandemic: patient experience qualitative study. BMJ Support Palliat Care2023; 14: e1512.
35.
BakitasMATostesonTDLiZ, et al. Early versus delayed initiation of concurrent palliative oncology care: patient outcomes in the ENABLE III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol2015; 33(13): 1438–1445.
36.
BernhardtFBückmannAKrügerJ, et al. Telemedicine plus standard care versus standard care only in specialized outpatient palliative care: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Telemed J E Health2024; 30(5): 1459–1469.
37.
BhargavaRKeatingBIsenbergSR, et al. RELIEF: A digital health tool for the remote self-reporting of symptoms in patients with cancer to address palliative care needs and minimize emergency department visits. Curr Oncol2021; 28(6): 4273–4280.
38.
CascellaMSchiavoDGrizzutiM, et al. Implementation of a hybrid care model for telemedicine-based cancer pain management at the Cancer Center of Naples, Italy: A cohort study. In Vivo2023; 37(1): 385–392.
39.
Castillo PadrósMRPastorNAltarriba ParacollsJ, et al. A smart system for remote monitoring of patients in palliative care (HumanITcare Platform): mixed methods study. JMIR Form Res2023; 7: e45654.
40.
Chávarri-GuerraYRamos-LópezWACovarrubias-GómezA, et al. Providing supportive and palliative care using telemedicine for patients with advanced cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico. Oncologist2021; 26(3): e512–e515.
41.
ChernyNIParrinelloCMKwiatkowskyL, et al. Feasibility of large-scale implementation of an electronic patient-reported outcome remote monitoring system for patients on active treatment at a community cancer center. JCO Oncol Pract2022; 18(12): e1918–e1926.
42.
ChowEWongRConnollyR, et al. Prospective assessment of symptom palliation for patients attending a rapid response radiotherapy program: feasibility of telephone follow-up. J Pain Symptom Manag2001; 22(2): 649–656.
43.
ChuaISOlmstedMPlotkeR, et al. Video and in-person palliative care delivery challenges before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Pain Symptom Manag2022; 64(6): 577–587.
44.
ChumblerNRMkantaWNRichardsonLC, et al. Remote patient–provider communication and quality of life: empirical test of a dialogic model of cancer care. J Telemed Telecare2007; 13(1): 20–25.
45.
CleelandCSWangXSShiQ, et al. Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol2011; 29(8): 994–1000.
46.
CornettaKNyarikiSManjiI, et al. Telehospice for cancer patients discharged from a tertiary care hospital in Western Kenya. J Pain Symptom Manag2023; 65(5): 378–387.
47.
FormicaVFossileEPellegrinoR, et al. The Medical Care Continuity (MCC) project. A pilot study of video-assisted home care within the eTEN European Community program. The Italian experience. Support Care Cancer2009; 17(5): 471–478.
48.
HowardAFMedhurstKManhasDS, et al. The usefulness of patient-reported outcomes and the influence on palliative oncology patients and health services: a qualitative study of the prospective outcomes and support initiative. Cancer Nurs2021; 44(5): 388–397.
49.
Hennemann-KrauseLLopesAJAraújoJA, et al. The assessment of telemedicine to support outpatient palliative care in advanced cancer. Palliat Support Care2015; 13(4): 1025–1030.
50.
HoekPDSchersHJBronkhorstEM, et al. The effect of weekly specialist palliative care teleconsultations in patients with advanced cancer –a randomized clinical trial. BMC Med2017; 15: 119.
51.
JohnsenATPetersenMASjøgrenP, et al. Exploratory analyses of the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT): a randomized trial of early specialized palliative care plus standard care versus standard care in advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer2020; 28(5): 2145–2155.
52.
LefresneSOlsonRCashmanR, et al. Prospective analysis of patient reported symptoms and quality of life in patients with incurable lung cancer treated in a rapid access clinic. Lung Cancer2017; 112: 35–40.
53.
MirOFerruaMFourcadeA, et al. Digital remote monitoring plus usual care versus usual care in patients treated with oral anticancer agents: the randomized phase 3 CAPRI trial. Nat Med2022; 28(6): 1224–1231.
54.
MkantaWNChumblerNRRichardsonLC, et al. Age-related differences in quality of life in cancer patients: a pilot study of a cancer care coordination/home-telehealth program. Cancer Nurs2007; 30(6): 434–440.
55.
NemecekRHuberPSchurS, et al. Telemedically augmented palliative care : empowerment for patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. Wien Klin Wochenschr2019; 131(23-24): 620–626.
56.
OelschlägelLChristensenVLMoenA, et al. Patients’ experiences with a welfare technology application for remote home care: a longitudinal study. J Clin Nurs2023; 32(17-18): 6545–6558.
57.
PimentelLEYennurajalingamSChisholmG, et al. The frequency and factors associated with the use of a dedicated supportive care center telephone triaging program in patients with advanced cancer at a comprehensive cancer center. J Pain Symptom Manag2015; 49(5): 939–944.
58.
PozzarRAEnzingerACPoortH, et al. Developing and field testing BOLSTER: A nurse-led care management intervention to support patients and caregivers following hospitalization for gynecologic cancer-associated peritoneal carcinomatosis. J Palliat Med2022; 25(9): 1367–1375.
59.
PozzarRAEnzingerACHowardC, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led telehealth intervention (BOLSTER) to support patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and their caregivers: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Gynecol Oncol2024; 188: 1–7.
60.
ReinkeLFSullivanDRSlatoreC, et al. A randomized trial of a nurse-led palliative care intervention for patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. J Palliat Med2022; 25(11): 1668–1676.
61.
ShepherdLGoldsteinDWhitfordH, et al. The utility of videoconferencing to provide innovative delivery of psychological treatment for rural cancer patients: results of a pilot study. J Pain Symptom Manag2006; 32(5): 453–461.
62.
SteelJLGellerDAKimKH, et al. Web-based collaborative care intervention to manage cancer-related symptoms in the palliative care setting. Cancer2016; 122(8): 1270–1282.
63.
SteelJLGeorgeCJTerhorstL, et al. Patient, family caregiver, and economic outcomes of an integrated screening and novel stepped collaborative care intervention in the oncology setting in the USA (CARES): a randomised, parallel, phase 3 trial. Lancet2024; 403(10434): 1351–1361.
64.
ValentiVRossiRScarpiE, et al. Nurse-led telephone follow-up for early palliative care patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Nurs2023; 32(11-12): 2846–2853.
65.
van GurpJvan SelmMVissersK, et al. How outpatient palliative care teleconsultation facilitates empathic patient-professional relationships: a qualitative study. PLoS One2015; 10(4): e0124387.
66.
ViitalaAÅstedt-KurkiPLehtoJT, et al. Online follow-up with a mobile device improves incurable cancer patients’ coping - a qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs2021; 55: 102047.
67.
WallJAPozzarRAEnzingerAC, et al. Improving the palliative-procedure decision-making process for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a secondary analysis. Gynecol Oncol2024; 188: 125–130.
68.
YountSERothrockNBassM, et al. A randomized trial of weekly symptom telemonitoring in advanced lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag2014; 47(6): 973–989.
69.
BergerotCDBergerotPGRazaviM, et al. Telehealth geriatric assessment and supportive care intervention (GAIN-S) Program: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2025; 23(6): 219–226.
70.
JangCSWangJDHouHP, et al. Tele-assisted home-based palliative care reduces health care costs for terminal cancer patients: real-world evidence from a regional hospital in Taiwan. J Palliat Med2024; 27(11): 1450–1458.
71.
KimMJTangMTaylorT, et al. Factors associated with cancer patients’ preferences for telemedicine or in-person palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manag2025; 70(2): e159–e166.
72.
NeoSHMokNNgXH, et al. Enhancing palliative care for advanced cancer patients: evaluating implementation and impact of a virtual nurse-led symptom monitoring and telehealth initiative. BMC Palliat Care2024; 23(1): 238.
73.
RosaWEEpsteinASLauriaT, et al. Post-acute transition to home with supportive care (PATHS): a novel nurse practitioner-led telehealth intervention to improve end-of-life oncology care. J Pain Symptom Manag2025; 69(5): 496–506.
74.
PatelMIKapphahnKDewlandM, et al. Effect of a community health worker intervention on acute care use, advance care planning, and patient-reported outcomes among adults with advanced stages of cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol2022; 8(8): 1139–1148.
75.
SpoelstraSLGivenBAGivenCW, et al. An intervention to improve adherence and management of symptoms for patients prescribed oral chemotherapy agents: an exploratory study. Cancer Nurs2013; 36(1): 18–28.
76.
AghdamMRFVodovnikAHameedRA. Role of telemedicine in multidisciplinary team meetings. J Pathol Inf2019; 10: 35.
77.
ChienLRobertsESoto Perez de-CelisE, et al. Telehealth in geriatric oncology: a novel approach to deliver multidisciplinary care for older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol2020; 11(2): 197–199.
78.
BasileIConsoloLColomboS, et al. Technology to support older adults in home palliative care: a scoping review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2024; 41(6): 673–690.
79.
TarbiECSchulerSLAmbroseN, et al. Telehealth for the study of palliative care communication: opportunities, methodological challenges, and recommendations. BMC Palliat Care2025; 24(1): 55.
80.
World Health Organization, International Telecommunication Union. WHO-ITU global standard for accessibility of telehealth 81services [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization and International Telecommunication Union, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240050464 (2022, accessed 18 April 2025).
81.
WebbMHurleySLGentryJ, et al. Best practices for using telehealth in hospice and palliative care. J Hosp Palliat Nurs2021; 23(3): 277–285.
82.
HutchinsonRNChiuEJBelinSC, et al. How is telehealth used to increase access to specialty palliative care? A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag2025; 69(4): e303–e314.
83.
DamschroderLJAronDCKeithRE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci2009; 4: 50.
84.
DixitNVan SebilleYCrawfordGB, et al. Disparities in telehealth use: how should the supportive care community respond?Support Care Cancer2022; 30(2): 1007–1010.
85.
BakitasMAGazawaySUnderwoodF, et al. Palliative video consultation and symptom distress among rural inpatients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open2025; 8(7): e2519426.
86.
KeseciogluJRusinovaKAlampiD, et al. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines on end of life and palliative care in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med2024; 50(11): 1740–1766.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
