Bureaucracy and burden: An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis of social welfare policy with consequences for carers of people with life-limiting illness
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2023
Bureaucracy and burden: An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis of social welfare policy with consequences for carers of people with life-limiting illness
For informal carers of people with life-limiting illness, social welfare policy related to income support and housing has been associated with varied psychosocial issues, yet remains relatively under-explored. An intersectional approach offers potential to illuminate diverse experiences and implications.
Aim:
To explore the way in which caring in the context of life-limiting illness is framed within welfare policy, to articulate inequities encountered by carers, and to identify policy and practice recommendations.
Design:
The Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis (IBPA) Framework was used to situate findings of a broader qualitative study.
Setting/participants:
Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with participants who were bereaved carers (n = 12), welfare workers (n = 14) and palliative care workers (n = 7), between November 2018 and April 2020, in an Australian region associated with socioeconomic disadvantage. Five elements of IBPA were applied to the products of analysis of this data.
Results:
Use of the IBPA Framework revealed that representations of carers and causes of their welfare needs in policy were underpinned by several assumptions; including that caring and grieving periods are temporary or brief, and that carers have adequate capacity to navigate complex systems. Policy and processes had differentiated consequences for carers, with those occupying certain social locations prone to accumulating disadvantage.
Conclusions:
This intersectional analysis establishes critical exploration of the framing and consequences of welfare policy for carers of people with life-limiting illness, presented in a novel conceptual model. Implications relate to intersectoral development of structural competency, responsiveness to structurally vulnerable carers in clinical practice, and needed policy changes.
BlankNBurströmB. Limiting long-term illness and the experience of financial strain in Sweden. Scand J Public Health2002; 30(1): 41–46.
2.
EssueBMBeatonAHullC, et al. Living with economic hardship at the end of life. BMJ Support Palliat2015; 5(2): 129–137.
3.
FunkLStajduharKToyeC, et al. Part 2: Home-based family caregiving at the end of life: a comprehensive review of published qualitative research (1998-2008). Palliat Med2010; 24(6): 594–607.
4.
GallagherD. Finances. In: OliviereDMonroeB (eds) Death, dying, and social differences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp.165–179, 1st ed.
5.
GardinerCTaylorBRobinsonJ, et al. Comparison of financial support for family caregivers of people at the end of life across six countries: a descriptive study. Palliat Med2019; 33(9): 1189–1211.
6.
GottMAllenRMoeke-MaxwellT, et al. ‘No matter what the cost’: a qualitative study of the financial costs faced by family and whānau caregivers within a palliative care context. Palliat Med2015; 29(6): 518–528.
7.
HanrattyBHollandPJacobyA, et al. Financial stress and strain associated with terminal cancer–a review of the evidence. Palliat Med2007; 21(7): 595–607.
8.
HudsonPLThomasKTrauerT, et al. Psychological and social profile of family caregivers on commencement of palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manag2011; 41(3): 522–534.
9.
LewisJMDiGiacomoMCurrowDC, et al. Dying in the margins: understanding palliative care and socioeconomic deprivation in the developed world. J Pain Symptom Manag2011; 42(1): 105–118.
10.
StajduharKFunkLToyeC, et al. Part 1: home-based family caregiving at the end of life: a comprehensive review of published quantitative research (1998-2008). Palliat Med2010; 24(6): 573–593.
11.
BryantTRaphaelD. Intersectionality, the welfare state and women’s health. Womens Health Urban Life2018; 13(2): 3–17.
12.
Esping-AndersenG. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
13.
RaphaelDBryantT. Power, intersectionality and the life-course: identifying the political and economic structures of welfare states that support or threaten health. Soc Theory Health2015; 13: 245–266.
HanrattyBJacobyAWhiteheadM. Socioeconomic differences in service use, payment and receipt of illness-related benefits in the last year of life: findings from the British Household Panel Survey. Palliat Med2008; 22(3): 248–255.
17.
JuddSSaichF. Family carers face loss of housing while grieving a loved one. Around the House: The Newsletter of Shelter NSW2016; 107: 22–24.
18.
StajduharKIMollisonAGiesbrechtM, et al. “Just too busy living in the moment and surviving”: barriers to accessing health care for structurally vulnerable populations at end-of-life. BMC Palliat Care2019; 18(1): 11–14.
19.
MakerYBowmanD. Income support for Australian carers since 1983: social justice, social investment and the cloak of gender neutrality. Aust J Soc Issues2012; 47(4): 435–456.
GkioulekaAHuijtsTBeckfieldJ, et al. Understanding the micro and macro politics of health: Inequalities, intersectionality & institutions - a research agenda. Soc Sci Med2018; 200: 92–98.
22.
HankivskyOCormierR. Intersectionality and public policy: some lessons from existing models. Polit Res Q2011; 64(1): 217–229.
23.
HankivskyOGraceDHuntingG, et al. Intersectionality-based policy analysis. In: HankivskyO (ed) An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework. Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University, 2012, pp.33–46.
24.
AbramsJATabaacAJungS, et al. Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research. Soc Sci Med2020; 258: 113138.
25.
HankivskyOGraceDHuntingG, et al. An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: critical reflections on a methodology for advancing equity. Int J Equity Health2014; 13: 119.
26.
GottMMorganTWilliamsL. Gender and palliative care: a call to arms. Palliat Care Soc Practice2020; 14: 1–15.
27.
ThackerNEDuranA. Operationalizing intersectionality as a framework in qualitative grief research. Death Stud2022; 46: 1128–1138.
28.
GrayDE. Theoretical perspectives and research methodologies. In: Doing research in the real world. 2nd ed.Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2009, pp.14–38.
29.
CreswellJW. Philosophical, paradigm and interpretive frameworks. In: Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2007, pp.15–31.
30.
ThorneSKirkhamSRMacDonald-EmesJ. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health1997; 20(2): 169–177.
31.
ThorneSKirkhamSRO’Flynn-MageeK. The analytic challenge in interpretive description. Int J Qual Methods2004; 3(1): 1–11.
32.
ThorneS. Interpretive Description: qualitative research for applied practice. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Routledge, 2016.
RitchieJLewisJ. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE Publications, 2003.
35.
BindleyKLewisJTravagliaJ, et al. Caring precariously: an interpretive description of palliative care and welfare worker perspectives on end of life carers navigating social welfare. Palliat Med2021; 35(1): 169–178.
36.
BindleyKLewisJTravagliaJ, et al. Social welfare needs of bereaved Australian carers: implications of insights from palliative care and welfare workers. Health Soc Care Comm2021; 29(3): 631–642.
37.
BindleyKLewisJTravagliaJ, et al. Caring and grieving in the context of social and structural inequity: experiences of Australian carers with social welfare needs. Qual Health Res2022; 32(1): 64–79.
38.
BambraCFoxDScott-SamuelA. Towards a politics of health. Health Promot Int2005; 20(2): 187–193.
New South Wales Government. Communities and Justice Website, https://www.facs.nsw.gov.au (2021, accessed 4 June 2022).
41.
QuesadaJHartLKBourgoisP. Structural vulnerability and health: Latino migrant laborers in the United States. Med Anthropol2011; 30(4): 339–362.
42.
Reimer-KirkhamSStajduharKPaulyB, et al. Death is a social justice issue: perspectives on equity-informed palliative care. Adv Nurs Sci2016; 39(4): 293–307.
43.
FunkLMDansereauLNovekS. Carers as system navigators: exploring sources, processes and outcomes of structural burden. Gerontologist2019; 59(3): 426–435.
NeveuE. Bourdieu’s capital(s): sociologizing and economic concept. In: MedvetzTSallazJJ (eds) The Oxford handbook of Pierre Bourdieu. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp.1–30.
46.
CollierABroomA. Unsettling place(s) at the end of life. Soc Sci Med2021; 288: 113536.
47.
GottM. Avoidable for whom? Hospital use at the end of life. Palliat Med2014; 28(7): 917–918.
48.
LobbEABindleyKSandersonC, et al. Navigating the path to care and death at home—it is not always smooth: a qualitative examination of the experiences of bereaved family caregivers in palliative care. J Psychosoc Oncol Res Prac2019; 1(1): e3–e7.
49.
BourdieuP. The forms of capital. Translated by Richard Nice. In: RichardsonJG (ed.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York, NY: Greenwood Press, 1986, pp.241–258.
50.
WoodwardK. The relevance of Bourdieu’s concepts for studying the intersections of poverty, race and culture. In: MedvetzTSallazJJ (eds) The Oxford handbook of Pierre Bourdieu. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp.629–644.
51.
DokaKJMartinTL. How we grieve: culture, class and gender. In:DokaKJ (ed.) Disenfranchised grief: new directions, challenges and strategies of practice. Champaign, IL: Research Press, 2002, pp.337–347.
52.
StroebeMSchutH. Overload: A missing link in the dual process model?OMEGA J Death Dying2016; 74(1): 96–109.
53.
MorganKP. Describing the emperor’s new clothes: three myths of educational (in)equality. In: DonaldsonELDillerAHoustonB, et al. (eds) The gender question in education: theory, pedagogy and politics. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, 2018, pp.105–122.
54.
Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2008.
55.
MarmotM. The health gap: improving health in an unequal world. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.
56.
BindleyKLewisJTravagliaJ, et al. Disadvantaged and disenfranchised in bereavement: a scoping review of social and structural inequity following expected death. Soc Sci Med2019; 242: 112599.
57.
TuffordLNewmanP. Bracketing in qualitative research. Qual Soc Work2012; 11(1): 80–96.
58.
PortacoloneE. The notion of precariousness among older adults living alone in the US. J Aging Stud2013; 27: 166–174.
59.
DouglasMDJosiah WillockRRespressE, et al. Applying a health equity lens to evaluate and inform policy. Ethn Dis2019; 29(Suppl 2): 329–342.
60.
KeleherH. Reframing Health Promotion. In: KeleherHMacDougallCMurphyB (eds) Understanding health promotion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp.29–46.
61.
MantouraPMorrisonV. Policy approaches to reducing health inequalities. Montréal, QC: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy, 2016.
62.
WhiteheadM. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv1992; 22(3): 429–445.
63.
CollieASheehanLMcAllisterA. The health of disability support pension and newstart allowance recipients. Melbourne: Monash University, 2019.
64.
GrindrodA. Choice depends on options: A public health framework incorporating the social determinants of dying to create options at end of life. Prog Palliat Care2020; 28: 94–100.
NeffJHolmesSMKnightKR, et al. Structural competency: curriculum for medical students, residents, and interprofessional teams on the structural factors that produce health disparities. MedEdPORTAL2020; 16: 10888.
67.
StoningtonSDHolmesSMHansenH, et al. Case Studies in social medicine - attending to structural forces in clinical practice. N Engl J Med2018; 379(20): 1958–1961.
68.
NeffJHolmesSMStrongS, et al. The Structural Competency Working Group: lessons from iterative, interdisciplinary development of a structural competency training module in structural competency in mental health and medicine. In: HansenHMetzlJM (eds) Structural competency in mental health and medicine. Cham: Springer, 2019, pp.53–74.
69.
ShawMDorlingDGordonD, et al. The Widening gap: Health Inequalities and policy in Britain. Bristol: The Policy Press, 1999.
Palliative Care Social Work Australia. Position paper: a social work perspective on the Palliative Care Australia (2020) Outcomes Paper - Palliative Care & COVID-19: grief, bereavement and mental health, 2020.
78.
MaylandCRPowellRAClarkeGC, et al. Bereavement care for ethnic minority communities: a systematic review of access to, models of, outcomes from, and satisfaction with, service provision. PLoS One2021; 16(6): e0252188.
79.
AllanJHarmsL. ‘Power and Prejudice’: Thinking differently about grief. Grief Matters2010; 13(3): 72–75.
80.
ThompsonNAllanJCarverhillPA, et al. The case for a sociology of dying, death, and bereavement. Death Stud2016; 40(3): 172–181.
81.
SutherlandNWard-GriffinCMcWilliamC, et al. Gendered processes in hospice palliative home care for seniors with cancer and their family caregivers. Qual Health Res2016; 26(7): 907–920.
82.
CordenAHirstMNiceK. Death of a partner. Bereave Care2010; 29(1): 23–28.
83.
DiGiacomoMLewisJPhillipsJ, et al. The business of death: a qualitative study of financial concerns of widowed older women. BMC Womens Health2015; 15(1): 36.
84.
HoltslanderLDugglebyW. The psychosocial context of bereavement for older women who were caregivers for a spouse with advanced cancer. J Women Aging2010; 22(2): 109–124.
85.
FengeLA. Developing understanding of same-sex partner bereavement for older lesbian and gay people: implications for social work practice. J Gerontol Soc Work2014; 57(2–4): 288–304.
86.
HoltslanderLBaxterSMillsK, et al. Honoring the voices of bereaved caregivers: a metasummary of qualitative research. BMC Palliat Care2017; 16(1): 48–18.
87.
BristoweKMarshallSHardingR. The bereavement experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or trans* people who have lost a partner: a systematic review, thematic synthesis and modelling of the literature. Palliat Med2016; 30(8): 730–744.
88.
GlackinMHigginsA. The grief experience of same-sex couples within an Irish context: Tacit acknowledgement. Int J Palliat Nurs2008; 14(6): 297–302.
