The comprehensive assessment of needs in palliative care identifies where patients most want attention to guide clinical decisions that tailor care provision from their first encounters.
Aim:
To define how and what needs are identified by the comprehensive assessment of needs in the original peer-reviewed articles in the field of palliative care.
Design:
An integrative systematic review as outlined by Whittemore and Knafl. Quality appraisal performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Data sources:
PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science databases searched through May 2019 and updated in July 2020.
Results:
Forty-nine articles met inclusion criteria for original articles in English or Spanish reporting comprehensive assessment of needs of adult patients receiving palliative care. The majority (41/49) of studies were moderate to high quality. Two themes were identified: (1) How a comprehensive assessment of needs should be carried out in palliative care, which reflected a preference to develop structured tools for assessment; (2) What needs of patients should be assessed in the comprehensive assessment of needs in palliative care, which conveyed a trend to assess beyond core domains – physical, psychological, social, spiritual – with information and practical most prevalent, but with substantial variation in specifying and classifying needs into domains.
Conclusions:
The assessment of needs in palliative care is comprehensive but lacks consensus on the needs and domains that should be assessed by the palliative care team. Future studies should better define what needs can be standardized into the assessment to improve process of care and patient satisfaction.
HodiamontFJüngerSLeidlR, et al. Understanding complexity - the palliative care situation as a complex adaptive system. BMC Health Serv Res2019; 19(1): 157.
4.
EtkindSNBristoweKBaileyK, et al. How does uncertainty shape patient experience in advanced illness? a secondary analysis of qualitative data. Palliat Med2017; 31(2): 171–180.
5.
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Center to Advance Palliative Care, Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association, et al. National consensus project for quality palliative care: clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care, executive summary. J Palliat Med2004; 7(5): 611–627.
6.
RadbruchLDe LimaLKnaulF, et al. Redefining palliative care—a new consensus-based definition. J Pain Symptom Manage2020; 60(4): 754–764.
7.
AhmedNHughesPHonsBA, et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial of a holistic needs assessment questionnaire in a supportive and palliative care service. J Pain Symptom Manage2015; 50(5): 587–598.
8.
AndersonEWFrazerMSSchellingerSE.Expanding the palliative care domains to meet the needs of a community-based supportive care model. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2018; 35(2): 258–265.
9.
WangTMolassiotisAPuiB, et al. Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care2018; 17(1): 96.
10.
HermannFHeinrichBPeterD, et al. Coping, distress, and survival among patients with lung cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry1999; 56(8): 756–762.
11.
BalboniTBalboniMPaulkME, et al. Support of cancer patients’ spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life. Cancer2011; 117(23): 5383–5391.
12.
WinkelmanWDLauderdaleKBalboniM, et al. The relationship of spiritual concerns to the quality of life of advanced cancer patients: preliminary findings. J Palliat Med2011; 14(9): 1022–1028.
13.
Delgado-GuayMOParsonsHAHuiD, et al. Spirituality, religiosity, and spiritual pain among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2012; 30(5): 455–461.
14.
TemelJSGreerJAMuzikanskyA, et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med2010; 363(8): 733–742.
15.
ZimmermannCSwamiNKrzyzanowskaM, et al. Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet2014; 383(9930): 1721–1730.
16.
FerrellBSunVHurriaA, et al. Interdisciplinary palliative care for patients with lung cancer betty. J Pain Symptom Manag2015; 50(6): 758–767.
17.
TemelJSGreerJAEl-jawahriA, et al. Effects of early integrated palliative care in patients with lung and GI cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol2017; 35(8): 834–841.
18.
El-JawahriAGreerJAPirlWF, et al. Effects of early integrated palliative care on caregivers of patients with lung and gastrointestinal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Oncologist2017; 22(12): 1528–1534.
19.
Porta-salesJGuerrero-torrellesMMoreno-alonsoD, et al. Is early palliative care feasible in patients with multiple myeloma?J Pain Symptom Manage2017; 54(5): 692–700.
20.
KavalieratosDCorbelliJZhangD, et al. Association between palliative care and patient and caregiver outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA2016; 316(20): 2104–2114.
21.
ZimmermannCRiechelmannRKrzyzanowskaM, et al. Effectiveness of specialized palliative care: a systematic review. JAMA2008; 299(14): 1698–1709.
22.
BakitasMATostesonTDLiZ, et al. Early versus delayed initiation of concurrent palliative oncology care: patient outcomes in the ENABLE III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol2015; 33(13): 1438–1445.
23.
HudsonPCollinsABostanciA, et al. Toward a systematic approach to assessment and care planning in palliative care: a practical review of clinical tools. Palliat Support Care2016; 14(2): 161–173.
24.
RemawiBNGadoudAMurphyIMJ, et al. Palliative care needs-assessment and measurement tools used in patients with heart failure: a systematic mixed-studies review with narrative synthesis. Heart Fail Rev2021; 26: 137–155.
25.
RichfieldEWJohnsonMJ.Palliative care in Parkinson’s disease: review of needs assessment tools. Ann Palliat Med2020; 9(Suppl 1): S6–S15.
26.
MaasEATMurraySAEngelsY, et al. What tools are available to identify patients with palliative care needs in primary care: a systematic literature review and survey of European practice. BMJ Support Palliat Care2013; 3(4): 444–451.
MoherDShamseerLClarkeM, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev2015; 4: 1.
29.
OsseBHPVernooij-DassenMJFJSchadéE, et al. Problems to discuss with cancer patients in palliative care: a comprehensive approach. Patient Educ Couns2002; 47(3): 195–204.
30.
OuzzaniMHammadyHFedorowiczZ, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev2016; 5: 210.
31.
HongQPluyePFàbreguesS, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018: user guide. Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada, 2018.
32.
PaceRPluyePBartlettG, et al. International Journal of Nursing Studies Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud2012; 49(1): 47–53.
33.
AslaksonRADySMWilsonRF, et al. Patient- and caregiver-reported assessment tools for palliative care: summary of the 2017 agency for healthcare research and quality technical brief. J Pain Symptom Manage2017; 54(6): 961–972.e16.
34.
TianLCaoXFengX.Evaluation of psychometric properties of needs assessment tools in cancer patients: a systematic literature review. PLoS One2019; 14(1): e0210242.
35.
JohnsenATPetersenMAPedersenL.Development and initial validation of the three-levels-of-needs questionnaire for self-assessment of palliative needs in patients with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage2011; 41(6): 1025–1039.
36.
OhJOhSKimJA.The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis supportive care needs assessment instrument: development and psychometric evaluation. Palliat Support Care2018; 16: 692–697.
37.
ShimELeeK-SParkJ, et al. Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation. Support Care Cancer2011; 19: 1957–1968.
38.
Mateo-ortegaDMaté-méndezJElaS, et al. Development of a tool to identify and assess psychosocial and spiritual needs in end-of-life patients: the ENP-E scale. Palliat Support Care2018; 17(4): 441–447.
39.
McilfatrickSHassonF.Evaluating an holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice. J Clinic Nurs2013; 23(7–8): 1064–1075.
40.
StielSPsychDPollokA, et al. Validation of the symptom and problem checklist of the German Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (HOPE). J Pain Symptom Manage2012; 43(3): 593–605.
41.
DillenKEbkeMKochA, et al. Validation of a palliative care outcome measurement tool supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+): identification of palliative concerns of neurological patients. Palliat Med2019; 33(9): 1221–1231.
42.
Garzón RodríguezCMartínez LosadaEJulia TorrasJ, et al. Herramientas para la evaluación multidimensional de uso para médicos de Cuidados Paliativos: Proyecto ICO-Tool Kit. Med Paliativa2010; 17(6): 348–359.
43.
MazzocatoCStiefelFDe JongeP, et al. Comprehensive assessment of patients in palliative care: a descriptive study utilizing the INTERMED. J Pain Symptom Manage2000; 19(2): 83–90.
44.
ReillyMOHonsOTLarkinP, et al. The impact of a novel tool for comprehensive assessment of palliative care (MPCAT) on assessment outcome at 6- and 12-month follow-up. J Pain Symptom Manage2016; 52(1): 107–116.
45.
RainbirdKPerkinsJSanson-FisherR, et al. The needs of patients with advanced, incurable cancer. Br J Cancer2009; 101(5): 759–764.
46.
SchofieldPUgaldeAGoughK, et al. A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Psychooncology2013; 22: 2445–2453.
47.
SchofieldPGoughKUgaldeA, et al. Validation of the needs assessment for advanced lung cancer patients (NA-ALCP). Psychooncology2012; 21(4): 451–455.
48.
WallerAGirgisALecathelinaisC, et al. Validity, reliability and clinical feasibility of a needs assessment tool for people with progressive cancer. Psychooncology2010; 19: 726–733.
49.
WallerAGirgisAJohnsonC, et al. Improving outcomes for people with progressive cancer: interrupted time series trial of a needs assessment intervention. J Pain Symptom Manage2012; 43(3): 569–581.
50.
WallerAGirgisAJohnsonC, et al. Implications of a needs assessment intervention for people with progressive cancer: impact on clinical assessment, response and service utilisation. Psychooncology2012; 21: 550–557.
51.
JanssenDJABoyneJCurrowDC, et al. Timely recognition of palliative care needs of patients with advanced chronic heart failure: a pilot study of a Dutch translation of the Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease – Heart Failure (NAT:PD-HF). Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2019; 18(5): 375–388.
52.
EmanuelLLAlpertHREmanuelEE.Concise screening questions for clinical assessments of terminal care: the needs near the end-of-life care screening tool. J Palliat Med2001; 4(4): 465–474.
53.
Ferraz GonçalvesJACastroCSilvaP, et al. Initial assessment of patients without cognitive failure admitted to palliative care: a validation study initial assessment of patients without cognitive failure admitted to palliative care: a validation study. Ann Palliat Med2016; 5(4): 248–252.
54.
Ferraz GonçalvesJA. Initial assessment of patients without cognitive failure admitted in palliative care. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2014; 31(1): 33–37.
55.
LambertSBellamyTGirgisA.Routine assessment of unmet needs in individuals with advanced cancer and their caregivers: a qualitative study of the palliative care needs assessment tool (PC-NAT). J Psychosoc Oncol2018; 36(1): 82–96.
56.
BuzgovaRSikorovaLJarosovaD.Assessing patients’ palliative care needs in the final stages of illness during hospitalization. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2016; 33(2): 184–193.
57.
BuzgovaRKozakovaRSikorovaL, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of patient needs assessment in palliative care (PNAP) instrument. Palliat Support Care2016; 14(2): 129–137.
58.
OsseBHPVernooijMJFJSchadeE.Towards a new clinical tool for needs assessment in the palliative care of cancer patients: the PNPC instrument. J Pain Symptom Manage2004; 28(4): 329–341.
59.
OsseBHVernooij-DassenMJSchadéE, et al. The problems experienced by patients with cancer and their needs for palliative care. Support Care Cancer2005; 13: 722–732.
60.
KhanLHughSAnsariS, et al. Needs assessment of patients and their caregivers at the rapid response radiotherapy program. J Pain Manag2012; 5(2): 153–162.
61.
OsseBHPJfjMCentreV.A practical instrument to explore patients’ needs in palliative care: the problems and needs in palliative care questionnaire – short version. Palliat Med2007; 21(5): 391–399.
62.
HermansKCohenJSpruytteN, et al. Palliative care needs and symptoms of nursing home residents with and without dementia: a cross-sectional study. Geriatr Gerontol Int2017; 17: 1501–1507.
63.
HermansKDe Almeida MelloJSpruytteN, et al. Does using the interRAI palliative care instrument reduce the needs and symptoms of nursing home residents receiving palliative care?Palliat Support Care2018; 16: 32–40.
64.
KüttnerSWüllerJPastranaT.How much psychological distress is experienced at home by patients with palliative care needs in Germany ? a cross-sectional study using the distress thermometer. Palliat Support Care2017; 15: 205–213.
65.
SteelKMorrisJRabinowitzT, et al. The RAI-PC: an assessment instrument for palliative care in all settings. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2003; 20(3): 211–219.
66.
AounSMMonterossoLKristjansonL.Measuring symptom distress in palliative care: psychometric properties of the symptom. J Palliat Med2011; 14(3): 315–321.
67.
RenovanzMHickmannACoburgerJ, et al. Assessing psychological and supportive care needs in glioma patients – feasibility study on the use of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS- – G) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey Screening Tool (SCNS- – ST9) in clinical practice. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)2018; 27(1): 1–13.
68.
WilsonKGGrahamIDViolaRA, et al. Structured interview assessment of symptoms and concerns in palliative care. Can J Psychiatry2004; 49(6): 350–358.
69.
KotronoulasGPapadopoulouCSimpsonMF, et al. Using patient-reported outcome measures to deliver enhanced supportive care to people with lung cancer: feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led consultation model. Support Care Cancer2018; 26(11): 3729–3737.
70.
BolandEBolandJEzaydiY, et al. Holistic needs assessment in advanced, intensively treated multiple myeloma patients. Support Care Cancer2014; 22: 2615–2620.
71.
LeppertWMajkowiczM.The adaptation of the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care (SPARC) to the polish clinical setting for needs assessment of advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage2012; 44(6): 916–922.
72.
MaselEKDivisionCMedicineI.The PERS 2 ON score for systemic assessment of symptomatology in palliative care: a pilot study. Eur J Cancer Care2016; 25(4): 544–550.
73.
MorassoGCapelliMViterboriP, et al. Psychological and symptom distress in terminal cancer patients with met and unmet needs. J Pain Symptom Manag1999; 17(6): 402–409.
74.
ProotIMAbu-saadHHGoldsteenM, et al. The needs of terminally ill patients at home: directing one’ s life, health and things related to beloved others. Palliat Med2004; 18: 53–61.
75.
AounSKristjansonLOldhamL, et al. A qualitative investigation of the palliative care needs of terminally ill people who live alone. Collegian2008; 15: 3–9.
76.
WijkHGrimbyA.Needs of elderly patients in palliative care. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2008; 25(2): 106–111.
77.
DaleMJJohnstonB.An exploration of the concerns of patients with inoperable lung cancer. Int J Nurs Stud2011; 17(6): 285–291.
78.
TallmanKGreenwaldRReidenouerA, et al. Living with advanced illness: longitudinal study of patient, family, and caregiver needs. Perm J2012; 16(3): 28–35.
79.
VeroneseSGalloGValleA, et al. The palliative care needs of people severely affected by neurodegenerative disorders: a qualitative study. Prog Palliat Care2015; 23(6): 331–342.
80.
HudsonBHuntVWaylenA, et al. The incompatibility of healthcare services and end-of-life needs in advanced liver disease: a qualitative interview study of patients and bereaved carers. Palliat Med2018; 32(5): 908–918.
81.
ArnoldBL.Mapping hospice patients’ perception and verbal communication of end-of-life needs: an exploratory mixed methods inquiry. BMC Palliat Care2011; 10(1): 1.
82.
SleemanKEde BritoMEtkindS, et al. The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions. Lancet Glob Health2019; 7(7): e883–e892.
83.
AntunesBHardingRHigginsonIJ.Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med2014; 28(2): 158–175.
84.
RainbirdKJPerkinsJJ.The needs assessment for advanced cancer patients (NA-ACP): a measure of the perceived needs of patients with advanced, inclurable cancer. A study of validity, realiability and acceptability. Psychoncol2005; 14(4): 297–306.
85.
PergolizziDCrespoIBalaguerA, et al. Proactive and systematic multidimensional needs assessment in patients with advanced cancer approaching palliative care: a study protocol. BMJ Open2020; 10: e034413.
86.
WilliamsCJShusterJLClayOJ, et al. Interest in research participation among hospice patients, caregivers, and ambulatory senior citizens: practical barriers or ethical contraints?J Palliat Med2006; 9(4): 968–974.
87.
AuALamWWTKwongA, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the Short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey Questionnaire. Psychooncology2011; 20: 1292–1300.
88.
WalshDDonnellySRybickiL.The symptoms of advanced cancer: relationship to age, gender, and performance status in 1, 000 patients. Support Care Cancer2000; 8: 175–179.
89.
StrömgrenASGoldschmidtDGroenvoldM, et al. Self-assessment in cancer patients referred to a study of feasibility and symptom epidemiology. Am Cancer Soc2002; 94(2): 512–520.
90.
BostonPBruceASchreiberR.Existential suffering in the palliative care setting: an integrated literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage2011; 41(3): 604–618.
91.
KeallRMClaytonJMButowPN.Therapeutic life review in palliative care: a systematic review of quantitative evaluations. J Pain Symptom Manage2015; 49(4): 747–761.
92.
GeorgesJJTheAMOnwuteaka-PhilipsenBD, et al. Dealing with requests for euthanasia: a qualitative study investigating the experience of general practitioners. J Med Ethics2008; 34(3): 150–155.
93.
Monforte-royoCVillavicencio-chaC.The wish to hasten death: a review of clinical studies. Psychooncology2011; 20: 795–804.
94.
Porta-salesJCrespoIMonforte-royoC, et al. The clinical evaluation of the wish to hasten death is not upsetting for advanced cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Palliat Med2019; 33(6): 570–577.
95.
PeroneSANikolicRLazicR, et al. Addressing the needs of terminally-ill patients in Bosnia-Herzegovina: patients’ perceptions and expectations. BMC Palliat Care2018; 17: 123.
96.
BuzgovaRKozakovaRJuricjovaL.The unmet needs of patients with progressive neurological diseases in the Czech republic: a qualitative study. J Palliat Care2019; 34(1): 38–46.
97.
RubensteinLZGoodwinMHadleyE, et al. Working group recommendations: methods for geriatric evaluation and management research. J Am Geriatr Soc1991; 39: 37S–41S.
98.
StuckAESiuALWielandGD, et al. Clinical practice. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet1993; 342: 1032–1036.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
