“By the time she got sick it was just kind of too late”: A qualitative study on advanced care planning among bereaved lesbian,gay,and bisexual older women
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2022
“By the time she got sick it was just kind of too late”: A qualitative study on advanced care planning among bereaved lesbian,gay,and bisexual older women
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) older women have unmet communication needs around palliative and end-of-life care. Past research has found communication differences for LGB women patients. Consequently, older LGB women may experience healthcare communication barriers around advance care planning.
Aim:
To explore experiences of bereaved LGB older women to understand perspectives regarding advance care planning communication between clinicians, patients, and dyads.
Design:
Guided by queer gerontology as a theoretical framework, this qualitative descriptive study employed individual interviews with purposively recruited participants. Interviews were conducted in person using a semi structured protocol and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Setting/participants:
Sixteen LGB women, age 60 years or older from across the United States who had lost a spouse/partner within the past 5 years.
Results:
Four main themes emerged from the transcripts, LGB older women: (1) experience unclear advance care planning communication and end-of-life care support from clinicians, (2) often avoid advance care planning discussions with spouse or partners, (3) lack of knowledge about palliative or end-of-life care, and (4) have more positive experiences when there is consistent communication with spouse or partner and clinicians during a spouse/partner’s illness and end-of-life.
Discussion:
While certain experiences and opinions may reflect those of non-LGB older adults, novel advance care planning barriers exist for LGB older women. Greater understanding among clinicians is needed regarding advance care planning conversations with LGB dyads. We recommend four improvements in training, recognition, acceptance, and dyad-based communication interventions.
AlmackK.‘I didn’t come out to go back in the closet’: ageing and end of life care for older LGBT people. In: KingAAlmackKWSSungYT (eds) Older lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people: minding the knowledge gaps. London: Routledge, 2018, pp.151–171.
2.
Statistics Canada. Canadian community health survey: annual component. Canada: Statistics Canada, 2021.
3.
The Williams Institute. LGBT demographic data interactive. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA School of Law, 2019.
4.
FloresA.Social acceptance of LGBT people in 174 countries, 1981 to 2017. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute, 2019.
5.
WilsonKStinchcombeARegaladoSM.LGBTQ+ aging research in canada: a 30-year scoping review of the literature. Geriatrics2021; 6(2): 1–21.
6.
WestwoodSLoweJ.The hidden sexualities of older lesbians and bisexual women. In: BarrettCHinchliffS (eds) Addressing the sexual rights of older people: theory, policy and practice. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017, pp.56–69.
7.
de VriesBGutmanG. End-of-life preparations among LGBT older adults. Generations2016; 40(2): 46–48.
8.
Fredriksen GoldsenKde VriesB. Global aging with pride: international perspectives on LGBT aging. Int J Aging Hum Dev2019; 88(4): 315–324.
9.
SandhuHAdamsASingletonL, et al. The impact of gender dyads on doctor-patient communication: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns2009; 76(3): 348–355.
10.
PorterLSKeefeFJBaucomDH, et al. A randomized pilot trial of a videoconference couples communication intervention for advanced GI cancer. Psychooncology2017; 26(7): 1027–1035.
11.
BristoweKHodsonMWeeB, et al. Recommendations to reduce inequalities for lgbt people facing advanced illness: ACCESSCare national qualitative interview study. Palliat Med2018; 32(1): 23–35.
12.
CloyesKGHullWDavisA.Palliative and end-of-life care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) cancer patients and their caregivers. Semin Oncol Nurs2018; 34(1): 60–71.
13.
SudoreRLLumHDYouJJ, et al. Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manag2017; 53(5): 821–832.e1.
14.
KcomtLGoreyKM.End-of-life preparations among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: integrative review of prevalent behaviors. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care2017; 13(4): 284–301.
15.
MarsackJStephensonR.Barriers to end-of-life care for LGBT persons in the absence of legal marriage or adequate legal documentation. LGBT Health2018; 5(5): 273–283.
16.
JuneA.A mixed method exploration of views of hospice and palliative care among sexually diverse women. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information & Learning, 2012.
17.
HashKMNettingFE.Long-term planning and decision-making among midlife and older gay men and lesbians. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care2007; 3(2): 59–77.
18.
BrownMT.LGBT aging and hetorical silence. Sex Res Soc Policy2009; 6(4): 65–78.
19.
KiaH.Hypervisibility: toward a conceptualization of LGBTQ aging. Sex Res Soc Policy2016; 13(1): 46–57.
20.
Ramirez-VallesJ.Queer aging: the gayby boomers and a new frontier for gerontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
BentleyBO’ConnorM.Conducting research interviews with bereaved family carers: when do we ask?J Palliat Med2015; 18(3): 241–245.
23.
Fredriksen-GoldsenKIKimHJ.The science of conducting research with LGBT older adults: an introduction to aging with pride: national health, aging, and sexuality/gender study (NHAS). Gerontologist2017; 57(suppl 1): S1–S14.
24.
GarveyJC.Considerations for queer as a sexual identity classification in education survey research. J Coll Stud Dev2017; 58(7): 1113–1118.
25.
MalterudKSiersmaVDGuassoraAD.Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res2016; 26(13): 1753–1760.
26.
LambertVLambertC.Qualitative descriptive research: an acceptable design. Pacific Rim Int J Nurs Res2012; 16(4): 255–256.
27.
SandelowskiM.What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health2010; 33(1): 77–84.
28.
SandelowskiMLeemanJ.Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res2012; 22: 1404–1413.
29.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ.Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care2007; 19(6): 349–357.
30.
ValentiKGJenSParajuliJ, et al. Experiences of palliative and end-of-life care among older LGBTQ women: a review of current literature. J Palliat Med2020; 23(11): 1532–1539.
31.
FabbreVD.Queer aging: implications for social work practice with LGBTQ older adults. Int Netw Crit Gerontol2017.
32.
BirksMChapmanYFrancisK.Memoing in qualitative research: probing data and processes. J Res Nurs2008; 13(1): 68–75.
33.
ThomasDR.Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research?Qual Res Psychol2017; 14: 23–41.
34.
BraunVClarkeV.Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Couns Psychother Res2021; 21(1): 37–47.
35.
VaismoradiMSnelgroveS.Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum Qual Soc Res2019; 20(3): 1–14.
36.
BraunVClarkeV.Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3(2): 77–101.
PattonM.Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 2002.
39.
RyanA.Post-positivist approaches to research. In: AntonesaMRyanABRyanA, et al. (eds) Researching and writing your thesis: a guide for postgraduate students. Maynooth, Ireland: MACE, National University of Ireland, 2006, pp.12–28.
40.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods2006; 80–92.
41.
BroderickDJBirbilisJMStegerMF.Lesbians grieving the death of a partner: recommendations for practice. J Lesbian Stud2008; 12(2/3): 225–235.
42.
DeeveyS.Bereavement experiences in lesbian kinship networks in Ohio. Diss Abstr Int Sect B Phys Sci Eng1997; 58(2): 630–630.
43.
JenkinsCLEdmundsonAAverettP, et al. Older lesbians and bereavement: experiencing the loss of a partner. J Gerontol Soc Work2014; 57(2-4): 273–287.
44.
CollinsAMcLachlanS-APhilipJ.Communication about palliative care: a phenomenological study exploring patient views and responses to its discussion. Palliat Med2018; 32(1): 133–142.
45.
ClaytonJMButowPNWatersA, et al. Evaluation of a novel individualised communication-skills training intervention to improve doctors’ confidence and skills in end-of-life communication. Palliat Med2013; 27(3): 236–243.
46.
Institute of Medicine. Clinician-patient communication and advance care planning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015.
47.
ImJMakSUpshurR, et al. “Whatever happens, happens” challenges of end-of-life communication from the perspective of older adults and family caregivers: a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care2019; 18(1): 113.
48.
AbbaKLloyd-WilliamsMHortonS.Discussing end of life wishes—the impact of community interventions?BMC Palliat Care2019; 18: 26.
49.
GoreyKMBartfayEKanjeekalSM, et al. Palliative chemotherapy among people living in poverty with metastasised colon cancer: facilitation by primary care and health insurance. BMJ Support Palliat Care2019; 9(3): bmjscare–2015.
50.
de VriesBGutmanGHumbleÁ, et al. End-of-life preparations among lgbt older canadian adults: the missing conversations. Int J Aging Hum Dev2019; 88(4): 358–379.
51.
KelleyASCovinskyKEGorgesRJ, et al. Identifying older adults with serious illness: a critical step toward improving the value of health care. Health Serv Res2017; 52(1): 113–131.
52.
SteinGLBerkmanCO'MahonyS, et al. Experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients and families in hospice and palliative care: perspectives of the palliative care team. J Palliat Med2020; 23(6): 817–824.
53.
MackJWWeeksJCWrightAA, et al. End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol2010; 28(7): 1203–1208.
54.
AlmackKSeymourJBellamyG.Exploring the impact of sexual orientation on experiences and concerns about end of life care and on bereavement for lesbian, gay and bisexual older people. Sociology2010; 44(5): 908–924.
55.
CantorMBrennanMShippyA.Caregiving among older lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender New Yorkers. New York, NY, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute2004.
56.
Brennan-IngMSeidelLLarsonB, et al. Social care networks and older LGBT adults: challenges for the future. J Homosex2014; 61(1): 21–52.
HardingREpiphaniouEChidgey-ClarkJ.Needs, experiences, and preferences of sexual minorities for end-of-life care and palliative care: a systematic review. J Palliat Med2012; 15(5): 602–611.
59.
WilmontSS.End-of-life care in critical condition. Am J Public Health2015; 105(1): 58–61.
60.
ZhuYEnguídanosS.When patients say they know about palliative care, how much do they really understand?J Pain Symptom Manag2019; 58(3): 460–464.
61.
EnguidanosSCardenasVWenceslaoM, et al. Health care provider barriers to patient referral to palliative care. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2021; 38: 1112–1119.
62.
HuskampHAKeatingNLMalinJL, et al. Discussions with physicians about hospice among patients with metastatic lung cancer. Arch Intern Med2009; 169(10): 954–962.
63.
MargoliesLBrownCG.Increasing cultural competence with LGBTQ patients. Nurs Clin North Am2019; 49(6): 34–40.
64.
MartinEMBarkleyTW.Improving cultural competence in end-of-life pain management. Nurs Clin North Am2016; 46(1): 32–41.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
